Iceland12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 24,758
- Reaction score
- 2,421
- Points
- 113
Nice work on the analysis. I'm not a Tubby basher either. Loved him during his first 4-5 years here and was one of the people who suggested putting Tubby talk on hold until after the season. He's a great man, but these types of statistics is exactly why I don't understand the outrage with national media (and Parski). I don't want to ask you to go through all that time again, but I'd be curious to see what these numbers would look like over the 6 years prior to Tubby's tenure for comparison.
Had the same thought about the National stance. Tubby's record at Minnesota was bad to mediocre, on top of that he just seemed flummoxed on how to make things better. Even if they understood that the National Media looked at what he did at Tulsa, Georgia and at Kentucky, with and without Pitino's players and they think it's Minnesota's problem not Tubby's.
Take a look at Monson's record here and then Clem's "non vacated" years. That will take you back to 1986. If you read those it's easy to understand when they say "you just can't win up there"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clem_Haskins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Monson#Minnesota