Pompous Elitist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2013
- Messages
- 24,421
- Reaction score
- 8,289
- Points
- 113
I agree our D played really well during that stretch and was a contributing factor in the TEAM winning those 4 games in a row. But in the Nebraska game our D didn't throw a cold blooded touchdown on 4th down, or run in 2 scores. I'm not saying Nelson is the QB we've been waiting for or he is elite or anything. My only point was that the team is not better off losing its most experienced QB. Especially since our QBs get banged up so often. We NEED 2 guys and having a 3rd is probably fairly important too.
That 4th down play was probably the greatest and most exciting pass and catches we saw this year. It was incredible. But would you trust Nelson to hit that pass again? Nelson has a shotgun arm. Not in the good way. If he could consistently hit throws like that we wouldn't be having this conversation at all would we? I think Leidner is probably a better runner than Nelson, so yeah, I think he runs for at least 2 tds.
You're right that it sucks from a depth perspective. But how many teams have 2 experienced QBs? It just doesn't happen unless one is overtaken on the depth chart or there is an injury. I'm hopeful we can keep Jones and rely on running the QB less. Many QBs play competently their freshman or redshirt freshman year. Many cannot. We're leaping to a lot of conclusions.
We don't have any idea how good we're going to be next year. The loss or gain of even one or two players can have a tremendous influence on team chemistry and efficiency. Part of the fun of college ball is that uncertainty. I like being the underdog and surprising. I will enjoy the ride. I think we'll be better next year but there are a thousand things that influence that outcome.