I have read that the Pinstripe Bowl has an agreement with the Big 10 to get different teams to their Bowl ( I think the goal was 8 different teams in 8 years?). If that is the case then Minnesota was always "in danger" (if that is your perspective of the Bowl) of going to the Pinstripe this year if they didn't distance themselves from their peers in the conference.
I do have some conflicting feelings about this that may or may not be warranted depending on the accuracy of the above information about the Pinstripe Bowl contract. Does our administration advocate enough for Gopher football with the conference? I feel like the changes to the B1G schedule this year that came late were not favorable to us. Last year, as many people noted, we went to a bowl that was two slots lower than our record indicated. Now this year we also get a bowl that is two slots lower than our record indicated. It seems like we're "owed" some favors, but maybe we're still paying back that Jan 1 gift we got under Kill? I consider myself part of the "just win" crowd so I also feel like if we just beat Purdue and Iowa...who knows what bowl we'd be talking about today. Also Iowa did finish with one fewer win, but they also played both Michigan and Ohio State in the crossovers, so I can see a case for them beyond their unbelievably lucky win over Minnesota.
I wish we were close enough in the voting to make the top 25 with a win, but that seems like an impossiblity. I thought we could get in last year with win over WVU, but we didn't make it. I like to see those seasons where the Gophers end the year in top 25. PJ, at least publicly, is saying the right things. I think the players will have a good time as NYC over the Holidays is kind of a bucket list thing for many (not all). 9-4 looks so much better than 8-5, so I hope PJ can extend his bowl win streak...though I'd rather lose this one and win in January 2024