Off the top of my head no and yet the Gophers still didn’t lose because of it.Either you can or you cannot back up your argument. Can you even name one bad call in the Gophers' favor in the last 30 minutes? Just one?
Off the top of my head no and yet the Gophers still didn’t lose because of it.Either you can or you cannot back up your argument. Can you even name one bad call in the Gophers' favor in the last 30 minutes? Just one?
Must poor officiating be a "conspiracy" to be unfair? Your arguments are nonsensical and silly.Calls even out in the end. There refs are not out to get the Gophers no matter how many times you’re told that on this board.
I want to give you a final chance to redeem your silliness. Are you trying to simply argue that the referees were not the ONLY factor, or are you actually trying to argue that they were no factor whatsoever in the outcome of the game? Because the latter is literally what your posts are saying.Off the top of my head no and yet the Gophers still didn’t lose because of it.
Perhaps he knew that Carr needed a timeout..... I thought Pitino and staff coached an amazing game at Purdue without Willis. We got, in my view, better looks than Purdue. They were hot with the 3 ball and we didn't catch a break at the end. They call a foul instead of Carr turning it over and we win the game in all likelihood. Nevertheless- I love this team. They are going to fight every game and there is enough talent here to have a good year.This. Man, of all of the bad times to take a timeout, that was an absolutely terrible one. Gophers were threatening to put the game away at that moment on momentum alone.
haha. Well, given Carr to that point had converted amazing scoring plays a bunch of times in a row, it could be said that the TO zapped everything out of Carr. He clearly wasn't the same player after the TO as he was before it.Perhaps he knew that Carr needed a timeout.....
haha. Well, given Carr to that point had converted amazing scoring plays a bunch of times in a row, it could be said that the TO zapped everything out of Carr. He clearly wasn't the same player after the TO as he was before it.
The biggest factor in the outcome of the game was Carr’s multiple turnovers and the teams inability to execute during the end of regulation and OT.Must poor officiating be a "conspiracy" to be unfair? Your arguments are nonsensical and silly.
I want to give you a final chance to redeem your silliness. Are you trying to simply argue that the referees were not the ONLY factor, or are you actually trying to argue that they were no factor whatsoever in the outcome of the game? Because the latter is literally what your posts are saying.
Yes, you are now ignored. You're welcome.The biggest factor in the outcome of the game was Carr’s multiple turnovers and the teams inability to execute during the end of regulation and OT.
Now do us both a favor and don’t just threaten to do it actually do it and put me on ignore.
Same. I've had enough Scools tonight for the rest of 2020.Yes, you are now ignored. You're welcome.
Do refs make bad calls? Absolutely!
Did the refs in the Purdue game get in a huddle and say "Let's screw the Gophers and make calls that favor Purdue?" No bleepin' way.
There is no conspiracy. You have every right to believe that some of the calls hurt the Gophers. But those calls were not intentional. Let's be clear about that.
In the end, calls influence the outcome of games. But in 99.5% of all games, the outcome of the game is determined by the players. go back in the 1st half when there were some missed layups or put-backs. I remember Oturu missing a bunny. If one of those shots goes in, that also changes the outcome of the game.
Don't like the officiating - Then don't put the game in a situation where one call can tip the outcome. Make plays. win the game. The Gophers didn't make enough plays to win the game.
I have not defended the officiating in the game. What I did was state multiple times the officiating did not cost the Gophers the game.There is a bizarre number of posts in this thread from scools12 defending the officiating in this game. The officials did not cost the Gophers the game as they had the ball up 3 late and completely failed to execute.
I have not defended the officiating in the game. What I did was state multiple times the officiating did not cost the Gophers the game.
For some on here that opinion is too much for them to take.
Maybe it's too much for people to take or maybe emotions are high after a frustrating loss and people are reading in to the extremes of each others takes instead of taking them at face value. Me reading you vehemently defend your officiating take had me assuming something that wasn't your actual position. That was my error.I have not defended the officiating in the game. What I did was state multiple times the officiating did not cost the Gophers the game.
For some on here that opinion is too much for them to take.
No, if your reply was to that ____, it wasn't your error.Maybe it's too much for people to take or maybe emotions are high after a frustrating loss and people are reading in to the extremes of each others takes instead of taking them at face value. Me reading you vehemently defend your officiating take had me assuming something that wasn't your actual position. That was my error.
If someone refuses to acknowledge how poor the officiating was tonight and how it contributed to us losing the game then that's as good as defending it. How can anybody, much less a gopher fan, blame our team entirely for this loss? Our players fought hard all night long to overcome bad call after bad call and fell just short... absolutely absurd to state that the refs didn't have a hand in us losing.Maybe it's too much for people to take or maybe emotions are high after a frustrating loss and people are reading in to the extremes of each others takes instead of taking them at face value. Me reading you vehemently defend your officiating take had me assuming something that wasn't your actual position. That was my error.
What happened in the tourney last year?
Yup.Should have ran the offense through oturu at the top of the key rather than a tired Carr trying to dribble time off the clock
So, the travelling call on Daniel(no foul), and lack of a foul called on Haarms on the Carr drive didn't play a part in the outcome?Here cncmin is how it works. There are bad calls in every game against every team. Do those bad calls when they happen at the end of a game sometimes play a part in the outcome of the game - yes. However, that was not the case in this game.
I think Block M nailed it, we are an imperfect team that played well but needed a few breaks. Carr was awesome for the first 35 min, in the last few minutes of regulation and the 2 OTs he was a trainwreck. But hes young and inconsistent, those things will happen. Refs didnt cost us the game but they also did us 0 favors and boosted Purdues chances. Free throw shooting also reared its ugly head.
These are all reasons we are somewhere from a 7 seed ncaa tournament team to a 4 seed NIT team. Lack of talented depth and youth makes for a lot of highs and lows.