From the Parkinglot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,376
- Reaction score
- 3,732
- Points
- 113
It was a rhetorical question. He stinks.
Wonder if the raiders roster 3? Nick Mullens would be a decent backup.Depending on which teams decide to keep 3 QB's on the roster, there will definitely be options available when more cuts start happening. Just depends on what kind of a guy, what kind of traits, KOC wants backing up Cousins.
Muellens is 3rd string in Oakland and far better than any back-up we have. Trade for him.
Good move. Mullens is a decent back up and conditional 7th round isn’t that much to give up.
Exactly. A 7th rounder probably doesn't make the roster. Mullens will. That's already a win.Good move. Mullens is a decent back up and conditional 7th round isn’t that much to give up.
Yep, that's good value for just a 7th rounder.Good move. Mullens is a decent back up and conditional 7th round isn’t that much to give up.
If you sit around thinking Mond is the QB of the future, that will set this franchise back years. Mond will never be a starting NFL QB.I think what we're seeing is that Zimmer and his staff never did anything to help develop Mond, because they didn't give a rip about the future.
so now, you have a guy who is - for all practical purposes - like a rookie. He did nothing for a year, and now he's trying to learn a new system.
I don't think you just jettison Mond. Ideally, the Vikes grab someone with a heartbeat to be the #2 QB and let Mond be the #3 guy and spend the season actually learning something about how to play QB in the NFL.
If you cut Mond loose, then the Vikes almost have to draft the "QB of the Future" next year, which might mean trading up in the 1st round.
Hell yes. Solid move. There could have been other solid options available in a week or two that didn't cost anything but the fact they made a move for Mullens, I trust KOC that he sees what is important to him in Mullens.Good move. Mullens is a decent back up and conditional 7th round isn’t that much to give up.
Kirk best not throw a pick on the first drive....View attachment 19883
I still find this to be a really surprising statistic.
He was decent for SF over several starts, and the Vikings offense is basically the Shanahan/SF offense, so it shouldn't be hard to pick up quickly.So the new QB was
1. available
2. picked up for a conditional 7th round draft choice
and the fans are happy.
Hey, I am not disputing that, right now, Mullens appears to be an improvement over the other QB's on the roster.
we'll see what happens if he actually has to play a meaningful game during the regular season.
He played a pre-season game and got heckled like crazy. Which was hilarious.You were wrong. He has already played, and he will be the starter later this year.
Meaningless statement.
I fully expect you to commit a crime. Welp, I guess we'll have to wait until you pass away, hopefully many years from now after a living a wonderful life, before I'm proven incorrect.
Thank goodness we live in a country where (most) people respect the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty" !!!
He played a pre-season game and got heckled like crazy. Which was hilarious.
I fully expect him to get into trouble again because of the precedent he has already set. Considering the sheer amount of accusations - if even half are true, I highly doubt he can just switch off whatever issue he has.
that’s a stretch. Maybe they watched him in practice and realized he sucked.I think what we're seeing is that Zimmer and his staff never did anything to help develop Mond, because they didn't give a rip about the future.
so now, you have a guy who is - for all practical purposes - like a rookie. He did nothing for a year, and now he's trying to learn a new system.
I don't think you just jettison Mond. Ideally, the Vikes grab someone with a heartbeat to be the #2 QB and let Mond be the #3 guy and spend the season actually learning something about how to play QB in the NFL.
If you cut Mond loose, then the Vikes almost have to draft the "QB of the Future" next year, which might mean trading up in the 1st round.
Can I ask what NFL can overcome their staring quarterback getting hurt and still winning? It’s not a unique problem or is it a money problem. There are 32 NFL teams and there are not 32 great or even good quarterbacks for these teams to fight over.It was always going to be, if Kirk gets hurt, the season is over.
That's what you get for sinking that much money into him. Lie down in bed with the decision you made. Do not sink more money into the QB position.
Nax says anyone who has ever committed a crime is guaranteed to do it again. Interesting, though silly and absurd, hypothesis.I highly doubt he can just switch off
Internet fans are hyper-reactive. If he plays mediocre in the next preseason game, they'll call for him to be cut.So the new QB was
1. available
2. picked up for a conditional 7th round draft choice
and the fans are happy.
Hey, I am not disputing that, right now, Mullens appears to be an improvement over the other QB's on the roster.
we'll see what happens if he actually has to play a meaningful game during the regular season.
That's bold.New ESPN power ranking has vikes ranked 23rd. Huh.
Vikes win at least 11 games. Book it.
That's bold.
Anything more than 9-8 would be shocking. The roster is top heavy and has little depth.
Their Vegas over/under is ~9. Winning more than that would hardly be shocking. They have 8 games against the Lions, Bears, Giants, Jets, Commanders and Dolphins. The only games they'd be more than 4 point underdogs in at this point is @Buffalo and @GB.That's bold.
Anything more than 9-8 would be shocking. The roster is top heavy and has little depth.