I think some are under valuing Rodney Smith in this thread. I thought he was very impressive as a freshman before getting hurt which I believe plagued him throughout the season. Like others, I think we'll be just fine at RB.
700 yards rushing as a freshman at the University of Minnesota does not smell like any kind of certainty for early entry into the NFL draft, let alone participation in an NFL draft.
His 6 yards per carry was the third highest for a freshman in school history behind only Maroney and Barber.
In fact, Brooks' stats as a freshman are almost identical to Barber's stats as a freshman. Barber missed his second season, was redshirted, and then later jumped to the NFL after his fourth season when he had no way to further his NFL stock.
According to my good doctor friend when you have to insert stabilization for healing especially in a high active area like the foot/ankle , 3-5 is overly optimistic because of pressure points on the area once the stabilization is removed. Total recovery could be 2-3 months before he is 100 %.
If that is the case, I see a RS. We don't need another Andre Hollins situation.
What is your point?
What is your point?
S&C program re-evaluation for a broken bone in the foot?Could this injury have been prevented? Probably. Not sure what actually took place. But regardless, I think it is time that TC evaluates his strength and conditioning program. As I remember it, the strength and conditioning coach came with Kill. Maybe he will be the next coach to be replaced. I was reminded of Iowa state where the strength coach was changed and instead of 1 player benching 400 lbs. In 6 months they have several. Just a different approach.
That he was a uniquely talented freshman comparable to other uniquely talented freshmen who ended up playing in the NFL.
What would have to happen that we would even want Brooks back for a fifth year?
S&C program re-evaluation for a broken bone in the foot?
I believe we made major changes for o-line conditioning this off-season, but running back foot injury prevention might be an issue more about equipment or freak accidents.
What? How can you argue that he's uniquely talented and you wouldn't want him back for a 5th year in the same post?
Because hoping Brooks is still around as a fifth-year senior is also hoping, if you're realistic, that he's not good enough to make the jump to the NFL after three or four years.