Gopher Warrior
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Messages
- 3,915
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Mason had offers from Kansas State, Virginia, Marquette, Clemson, La Salle, Providence, SMU, Harvard, and Lehigh among others...
Big time get for us!
Mason had offers from Kansas State, Virginia, Marquette, Clemson, La Salle, Providence, SMU, Harvard, and Lehigh among others...
Big time get for us!
Mason had offers from Kansas State, Virginia, Marquette, Clemson, La Salle, Providence, SMU, Harvard, and Lehigh among others...
Big time get for us!
[SUP][/SUP]
Quality player but I would say a "big time get" is stretching it. Travis or Vaughn would be big time, IMO...
Sid's first breaking news was the signing of James Naismith
"
Playing for one of the elite AAU teams of the summer Mason played along side guys like Theo Pinson (5-star, North Carolina commit), LJ Peak (4-star Georgetown), Gary Clark (3-star, Cincy), Shelton Mitchell (4-star, Wake). But Mason didn't just play "with" those guys, he was a focal point. In the Peach Jam title game Mason scored the team's second most points (21) and lead the team with 7 assists to just 2 turnovers. In an earlier game CP3 faced Howard Pulley and won 90-73 and Mason's line was 19 points, 5 assists and 3 turnovers against the Tyus Jones led Panthers.
"
http://www.thedailygopher.com/2013/...cruiting-nate-mason-signs-with-golden-gophers
Is anyone concerned about the low release point on Mason's shot? Granted, I've only watched a few highlights, so I don't know much about his game. It's just one thing that struck me.
Don't worry. Christian Ponder said that his low release point is "easily correctable".
Mason actually reminds me a little bit of Dre Hollins. A scoring combo guard, not really a true PG. He's a little smaller though. One of the Gopher 247 guys said a few national scouts have told him they think Mason is very underrated. Solid get. I think Carlos Morris will be next.
2014 video shows a much higher release point than his underclassmen videos. I see it as a non factor....Is anyone concerned about the low release point on Mason's shot? Granted, I've only watched a few highlights, so I don't know much about his game. It's just one thing that struck me.
Agree. Smaller but a better ball handler.
Wow! Huge get, and great looking player. I've been as excited about his highlight tape as anyone's on our list save Whitehead and Vaughn. I'm pretty dang jacked right now. Things are looking way up.
I would in no means call this a "Huge get." Reid Travis would be a "Huge get" and so would Vaughn (obviously). Pitino appears to be building a foundation of "underrated," "four-year"-three star recruits. I hope the big splash is coming soon. Mason appears to be a legit Division I baller, but nothing that is going to turn a program around. He is a run-of-the-mill recruit outside the top 100-150. I'm sure someone is going to call me out and begin with the personal attacks and tell me "stars don't matter," but they do. I'm not even going to open the dialogue on that topic since it's been pounded into the ground on this site in the past.
But, again, I'd like to make it clear: I believe Mason could be a solid player, but this program needs something to get excited about: A top 100, 4 or 5 star athlete that can become the cornerstone of this team for the next couple years. Mason, though solid, is not that playeR ON PAPER.
Pitino appears to be building a foundation of "underrated," "four-year"-three star recruits. I hope the big splash is coming soon. Mason appears to be a legit Division I baller, but nothing that is going to turn a program around. He is a run-of-the-mill recruit outside the top 100-150.
I would in no means call this a "Huge get." Reid Travis would be a "Huge get" and so would Vaughn (obviously). Pitino appears to be building a foundation of "underrated," "four-year"-three star recruits. I hope the big splash is coming soon. Mason appears to be a legit Division I baller, but nothing that is going to turn a program around. He is a run-of-the-mill recruit outside the top 100-150. I'm sure someone is going to call me out and begin with the personal attacks and tell me "stars don't matter," but they do. I'm not even going to open the dialogue on that topic since it's been pounded into the ground on this site in the past.
But, again, I'd like to make it clear: I believe Mason could be a solid player, but this program needs something to get excited about: A top 100, 4 or 5 star athlete that can become the cornerstone of this team for the next couple years. Mason, though solid, is not that playeR ON PAPER.
I would in no means call this a "Huge get." Reid Travis would be a "Huge get" and so would Vaughn (obviously). Pitino appears to be building a foundation of "underrated," "four-year"-three star recruits. I hope the big splash is coming soon. Mason appears to be a legit Division I baller, but nothing that is going to turn a program around. He is a run-of-the-mill recruit outside the top 100-150. I'm sure someone is going to call me out and begin with the personal attacks and tell me "stars don't matter," but they do. I'm not even going to open the dialogue on that topic since it's been pounded into the ground on this site in the past.
But, again, I'd like to make it clear: I believe Mason could be a solid player, but this program needs something to get excited about: A top 100, 4 or 5 star athlete that can become the cornerstone of this team for the next couple years. Mason, though solid, is not that playeR ON PAPER.
I agree I need to exercise restraint on the word "huge," but Mason is an underrated 3*, and based on the tapes I've seen, in my mind he's just as good as some of these 4* players we've been in the mix for. He's no "run of the mill" player.
Victor Oladipo, Joseph Bertrand, Reggie Hearn, Jordan Hulls, John Shurna, Ben Brust and others disagree.
Now I'm not saying Mason will turn out to be the second coming or anything like that, but a ranking does not determine one's impact in college.