Bo Ryan
One of the most disappointing things that has happened over the past two years is the migration of the low expectations crowd from the football board over to the basketball board. It's so pathetic to read these posts excusing poor performance based on history. I guess schools like UConn, Wisconsin, and Baylor should have just closed up shop because Minnesota was a superior program to all 3 historically. I guess Minnesota should be expected to compete for national titles in football with regularity because history shows that very few programs have won 6 of them.
Tubby is 6-21 in his last 27 Big Ten games and 2-10 in his last 12 Big Ten home games. Tubby's best
conference record after 5 years will be WORSE than Bo Ryan's worst conference record in his tenure at Wisconsin.
Tubby was not brought in to Minnesota to go .500 in the conference, much less perform similar to Dan Monson, he was brought in to compete fore conference championships. Thank god, the administration hasn't taken the view of basketball that many have of football or we would have hired a coach for 800K- 1 mil who "understands Minnesota".
I cannot stand the idea that Minnesota should somehow accept not being a Big Ten contender in revenue sports and the "fans" who are willing to accept/justify poor performance are certainly part of the problem.
We're all "cut from different cloth", so certain ideas hit people very differently. What hit me hard was the above posters statement that "Tubby's best conference record after 5 years will be WORSE than Bo Ryan's worst conference record in his tenure at Wisconsin". It seems to me, this fact is far more interesting and relevant than all the earlier discussion about Coach K, etc.
Perhaps we can chew on this one a little bit. It seems unbelievable to me that Wisconsin can hire this guy Bo Ryan from UofW-Milwaukee by-way-of UofW-Platteville and achieve remarkable success while Minneosta hires one of the biggest names in college basketball who is now 6-21 in his last 27 games in the Big Ten.
So, to those of you who are truly students of college basketball (of which I'm not), please answer these questions (I realize these questions call for speculation only, but isn't that what 99% of this board is about. Also, I realize that many of you are highly sarcastic and highly skeptical individuals. So let me clear up one thing to begin with: these are honest and genuine questions the answers to which I'm truly interested in reading. In other words, I'm not "yanking any chains" here):
1. how come Minnesota never seems to end up with a highly successful hire like Bo Ryan, and Wisconsin does? Is it just luck or has Minnesota always sucked at finding or attracting talent?
2. would Bo Ryan have been as successful at the UofM as he has been at Wisconsin (let's try to ignore his personality for sake of this discussion)
3. would Tubby have had more success at Wisconsin than he's had here?
4. is Tubby an inferior basketball coach compared to Bo Ryan, Tom Crean, Tom Izzo, Bill Carmody, et al, at this point in his life (for example, when I watch Northwestern and Michigan State operate in their half-court offenses, in my mind they truly make Minnesota look like a poorly coached team. This has nothing to do with talent and everything to do with intelligent, keen basketball acumen and execution).
5. in the 4 or 5 years of Tubby's recruiting, has he out-recruited Bo Ryan or under-recruited him? what about the other Big Ten coaches? Wouldn't you think he should be getting many of the best players who opt for the Big Ten? Isn't at least 60% or 70% of a recruit's decision based on the head coach?
6. it seems to me that the Gophers lose lots of fairly close games in sort of the same way. does this mean that our coach doesn't recognize what's wrong and therefore has no chance to change it? for example, towards the end of the games (and I think I watch carefully and try to be objective), our guards dribble around a great deal, often times lose the ball, dribble into corners, dribble into triple coverage down along the baseline and over and over and over pick up their dribble. these are things for which high school coaches bench players (not to mention, rarely do I see one of our players roll the proper way after a screen. this is child-stuff. and it does make a difference). or is it that our players are just don't understand the fundamentals of sound basketball and refuse to learn it?
Okay, I hope you guys will answer as few or as many of these questions as you like. Just pick and choose. I'm very interested in hearing what everyone thinks.