mcal24
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,968
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 48
I think the reaction has been fairly tame for a team that is 2-7 in conference play and has now lost ALL SIX close games in conference play. I think there is a happy medium between "move along there's nothing to see here" and "Pitino sucks, get him out of here". As someone who was incredibly impressed with some of the things Pitino was able to do in year 1, I am somewhere between concerned and very concerned by what we've seen in year 2. The B1G is as bad as I can remember it being, there isn't a team outside of Wisconsin who I'd feel confident about advancing to the round of 32 in the NCAA's this year. The conference was considerably better last year, but the Gophers are considerably worse. Some people point to Austin Hollins, but Austin had a really bad stretch of B1G games last year and we all know we didn't have a healthy Andre Hollins post Wisconsin...and that team still went 8-10 in conference play and probably should have 10-8. I can say Andre Hollins' defense is noticeably improved this year and that Charles Buggs has made some strides, but beyond that? We've clearly seen regression from Mathieu and I'd argue we've seen it from Walker and Eliason too. I don't think a credible claim can be made that anyone outside of Buggs/Hollins has improved an aspect of their game in a noticeable way from last season.
The other side of the coin is that Pitino has put this team in position to win games, and guys have flat out choked. Repeatedly. It's not hard to look back at these 9 games and say that the team could/should be 6-3 or 5-4 right now. The fact is they are 2-7 and coaches that are 2-7 deal with an unhappy fan base.
I agree with almost everything you say. But I don't know that the Big Ten is that much worse than last year. There might be less elite teams, but I still think this conference is as good as it gets when you look at the middle of the pack teams.