go_gophers
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 345
- Points
- 63
What do you mean...?People that think he will be a Gopher must also believe in the tooth fairy.
What do you mean...?People that think he will be a Gopher must also believe in the tooth fairy.
Living in a fantasy land.What do you mean...?
Are you saying the tooth fairy isn't real?!?Living in a fantasy land.
Yeah who in the hell put that money under my pillow?Are you saying the tooth fairy isn't real?!?
Are you saying the tooth fairy isn't real?!?
Interest piqued.
Had quite the man bun going, if I remember correctly.I don’t think I saw Garcia play for Marquette at all. How did he look? Gritty?
That is either REALLY gritty or not gritty at all.Had quite the man bun going, if I remember correctly.
Could simply be nasty.That is either REALLY gritty or not gritty at all.
Just the idea that he looked in the mirror every morning and said “the babes are going to dig this” tells me he has grit in places I don’t even want to think about.
Would not be surprised to see him join Walton at UNC, why not right?
"North Carolina, Arizona, Texas, Illinois, Oklahoma State, Minnesota and George Mason are among the schools to show interest in Marquette transfer Dawson Garcia, source told ESPN," Borzello wrote on Twitter. "A return to the Golden Eagles is also a possibility."
Would not be surprised to see him join Walton at UNC, why not right?
LolOn this one I'm not sure. Solely based on his choice of hair style, I don't really know what he is looking for.
Like, does he want the hot girl or a project chick?
IMO he's saying he has a fairly high degree of confidence but no assurances that Garcia is not interested in the Gophers. Kinda awkward way to word it but I don't think he's saying anything about it making him "feel good" to see Garcia not come here.Why does Wolfson “feel good” about Garcia not playing for the Gophers?
i honestly see no reason why they would do this when they have numerous people with massively higher brand profiles with NFL, NHL, MLB, NBA players readily at hand. No person is going to say, I'm now going to shop at Target because Dawson Garcia did a commercial for them. Like we've hyped our Fortune 500 clout here numerous times, but I really just can't see it happening the way we hope it would to help us. I feel like the more likely is smaller institutions trying to leverage a player who will cost less to ramp their brand up locally (ie there would've probably been a good bit of hype from many smaller businesses for Tyler Johnson when he was here) given Target is already a national brand and don't need any help. I can also see this allowing boosters for the major schools in the South using this as a way to get these kids cars, etc. as a local booster who owns an auto dealership can run an "ad" using these players then pay them whatever they want and now it will be above the table rather than jettisoned to them under the table as is happening now (if you're wondering what I mean, go see what players at SEC schools are driving regularly)
I have said this before, and I could be VERY wrong, but things like this give me hope for a player like Dawson. 3M/Best Buy/Target whoever comes in and says, hey Dawson, you are a big name in the cities, you come to the Gophers and be that local hero we could hook you up with a $250k deal to do some commercials. Company wins getting a local kid, Dawson gets to cash in, and program wins. Now again, there is absolutely no way to know how these things happen, but I am trying my best to keep positive about it and how it could help the gophers. Now, could Nike come in and say hey Dawson, go to Duke, we will give you $300k to do a commercial, sure, but we at least have some local brand power to help.
i honestly see no reason why they would do this when they have numerous people with massively higher brand profiles with NFL, NHL, MLB, NBA players readily at hand. No person is going to say, I'm now going to shop at Target because Dawson Garcia did a commercial for them. Like we've hyped our Fortune 500 clout here numerous times, but I really just can't see it happening the way we hope it would to help us. I feel like the more likely is smaller institutions trying to leverage a player who will cost less to ramp their brand up locally (ie there would've probably been a good bit of hype from many smaller businesses for Tyler Johnson when he was here) given Target is already a national brand and don't need any help. I can also see this allowing boosters for the major schools in the South using this as a way to get these kids cars, etc. as a local booster who owns an auto dealership can run an "ad" using these players then pay them whatever they want and now it will be above the table rather than jettisoned to them under the table as is happening now (if you're wondering what I mean, go see what players at SEC schools are driving regularly)
over the table payments instead of under the table?Will individual players get to advertise sponsors on their jerseys? Otherwise, what value does the endorsing company get from a college student?
I get what you're saying for sure and agree that most of the money is probably going to come from a deal to sign all college players for video games. I don't see even it being that widespread for college players and many lottery picks will probably be advised to hold out on many deals unless they can land what the top 5 picks are getting as far as shoe deals, etc. early. this whole thing is going to get really messy and I'd imagine most of the money to many players is going to come from smaller companies looking to get a name out there, rather than the big boys who know they can hold out/be more selectiveI think the key is, all-american/those who are projected to be lottery picks.
Economically if you can lock in a 4 year deal with a college kid to be a "ambassador" and they do well in the pros, you saved yourself some money as oppose to waiting to sign them as all stars, etc.
It's a gamble for sure, but the big companies know what they are doing. They wont just throw money around to every kid. Unless you have top 10 pick potential, I dont see "big" money going to 99% of D1 basketball players.
Money will come from companies like EA, etc.
on a related note, do we have any idea how many of our local fortune 500 companies even sign athletes? Can't say I've ever seen a Target or 3M ad with an athlete. I don't watch a ton of TV howeverI think the key is, all-american/those who are projected to be lottery picks.
Economically if you can lock in a 4 year deal with a college kid to be a "ambassador" and they do well in the pros, you saved yourself some money as oppose to waiting to sign them as all stars, etc.
It's a gamble for sure, but the big companies know what they are doing. They wont just throw money around to every kid. Unless you have top 10 pick potential, I dont see "big" money going to 99% of D1 basketball players.
Money will come from companies like EA, etc.