MplsGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 36,668
- Reaction score
- 10,148
- Points
- 113
Or just, you know, wait til the cap gets biggerVikings need to pay for their sins at some point.
Or just, you know, wait til the cap gets biggerVikings need to pay for their sins at some point.
The best way to bite the bullet on Cousin's dead money instead of pushing it farther out is to have a QB on a rookie deal. Drafting is always a crapshoot and I'm a Cousins fan but at some point we're going to need to pay the piper. We don't have enough talent to support Kirk in a 2-year window IMO. It will be an interesting couple of months for sure.Or just, you know, wait til the cap gets bigger
Vikings need to pay for their sins at some point. I agree with you. Just get it out the way.
Correct….age means almost nothing unless you are worried about having him for 15 years instead of 12.I don't care about the age that much, but drafting a QB to sit him for 2/5 of the window where he's cheap doesn't make sense with the modern salary cap. Just because it sort of worked for the Packers with Jordan Love doesn't make it a good plan.
But why bite a bullet just to bite a bullet, when you don't have to??The best way to bite the bullet on Cousin's dead money instead of pushing it farther out is to have a QB on a rookie deal.
Just like the Lions didn't have enough talent to support Goff in 2021.We don't have enough talent to support Kirk in a 2-year window IMO.
Where do you come up with this stuff?Great QB's almost never become free agents.
Both Cunningham and Cousins have a glaring hole in their resumes that the other 11 QBs have attained.Where do you come up with this stuff?
Brady, Montana, Manning, Favre, Brees, Warner, Wilson, Unitas, Dawson, Moon, Gannon, Cunningham, Cousins...
Should I keep going?
Fine. Great QB's in their prime, almost never become free agents. Montana, Brady, Favre and Moon were all late 30's when they become free agents. So Brees and Peyton Manning are the exceptions and Brees wasn't considered great when he left San Diego.Where do you come up with this stuff?
Brady, Montana, Manning, Favre, Brees, Warner, Wilson, Unitas, Dawson, Moon, Gannon, Cunningham, Cousins...
Should I keep going?
That was a lot of words just to say this, which is correct and what you should've said in the first place, instead of your previous incorrect statement.Winning a Super Bowl by signing a big $$ free agent QB rarely happens.
Stafford was traded for. Goff was traded for. Jimmy G was traded for by the 49ers. None were signed as free agents. Try again.Note the sneaky switch to winning the Super Bowl instead of just getting there.
Also “big $$$”
Stafford free agent. Goff this year free agent. Jimmy G free agent.
Howeda’s flimsy, squishy point has been cut in half with a katana.
All true.Stafford was traded for. Goff was traded for. Jimmy G was traded for by the 49ers. None were signed as free agents. Try again.
BTW, what year was the 2nd Super Bowl Jimmy G made it to?Jimmy G inbetween, made it to the SB twice, as is the goal.
“Two ways” disproven
I never said it was the only way, but it is the most common way.Good lord. How dishonest can you get?
You’re trying to argue that you have to have a rookie contract QB, as the only way.
None of those were rookie contract QB’s. Doesn’t matter how they were acquired. They were paying way more than a rookie deal.
Teddy Bridgewater was named HC at Miami N.W., his alma mater, one of the best HS programs in Miami.
Very cool and great to see him be in a position to coach and teach young men.
Thought of this when Purdy was struggling wearing the glove on his throwing hand during the rain game. My first thought was “Teddy wouldn’t have had a problem with that.”He'll always be "Teddy Two-Gloves" to some of us...
I originally screwed up that he was on the Pats when he won the SB twice. So when ope posted:BTW, what year was the 2nd Super Bowl Jimmy G made it to?
I mistook that for being a 2x NFC champion.Jimmy G is an NFC Champion, not a SB Champion (as a starter).
Doing a fake differentiation between FA and trade is just dishonesty.I never said it was the only way, but it is the most common way.
Winning a Super Bowl by signing a free agent QB is very difficult.
^^^^^^^ All those smileys.
Souhans plan is they should sign Cousins, JJ, and Hunter.
A few months back I said this is what they wil do, and you and a bunch of others lectured me on learning how the salary cap works. They can't possibly sign all three.
You had better hope this doesn't happen, Mlps..........or you should go back and start deleting some of your posts to me on this. You and some others were giving me lessons on the salary cap.
No it isn't. Trading for a young QB who's "blocked" on his current team like Jimmy G or Brett Favre is very different than spending top $$ on an established free agent.Doing a fake differentiation between FA and trade is just dishonesty.
Both are exactly the same in the way that counters your point: non-rookie contracts.
Jim and certain posters here think "yadda yadda" Rob Brzynski" is all you have to do to manage the salary cap.I couldn't tell if Souhan's column was meant to be serious or sarcastic. he is apparently advocating that the Vikings sign 3 players to big-money contracts while claiming that (paraphrasing) "they can work out the salary cap." problem solved - just work out the salary cap. I guess it's just that easy - just tell the salary-cap people to make the numbers work. it's like magic.
sorry, but I just don't believe that things are that simple. every salary cap choice has ramifications for the rest of the roster. if you sign those three players, who has to be cut or agree to take a smaller salary to make it work? what does that mean for team depth?
and then the real bottom line --
one of Souhan's 5 points was: "Get better at roster building."
another magic solution. just get better. it's that easy. why hasn't every team in town figured this out? Wolves - just get better. Wild - just get better. Twins - just get better.
all of our problems are solved. glory, hallelujah.
Regarding the salary cap:
How much of that cap should the Vikings commit to JJ — who is a pass catcher, last time I checked — and what impact does the pending QB decision have on the JJ situation, and the cap?
If I recall correctly, JJ has said he wants to be the highest-paid non-QB in the league.
Do we pay him that kind of money, and then go cheap on the QB who will be throwing to our highly-paid receiver? That seems a little risky to me.
It's a tough question, with no easy answers.
I couldn't tell if Souhan's column was meant to be serious or sarcastic. he is apparently advocating that the Vikings sign 3 players to big-money contracts while claiming that (paraphrasing) "they can work out the salary cap." problem solved - just work out the salary cap. I guess it's just that easy - just tell the salary-cap people to make the numbers work. it's like magic.
sorry, but I just don't believe that things are that simple. every salary cap choice has ramifications for the rest of the roster. if you sign those three players, who has to be cut or agree to take a smaller salary to make it work? what does that mean for team depth?
Yep, and if you sign JJ to a 7 year deal, lets say..........In 3 years it will seem like a steal.Again, I'd highly recommend giving this a listen if any of you have 20-25 minutes. Braun is a pretty sharp cat, borderline pretty nerdy, but he's generally spot on. Here he lays out how the Vikings can sign Hunter, Jefferson, Harrison Smith retires, etc. The Vikings are actually in VERY good shape with the cap in 2024 and EXCEPTIONALLY good shape with the cap in 2025.