Gophers1992
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2019
- Messages
- 4,235
- Reaction score
- 6,128
- Points
- 113
I'm going to throw Bert Blyleven as a guess as well.Cy Young has to be one of them along with Christy Mathewson & Walter Johnson.
I'm going to throw Bert Blyleven as a guess as well.Cy Young has to be one of them along with Christy Mathewson & Walter Johnson.
I won't spoil the answers but since none of yours were listed I'm going to assume they only count guys who pitched after the award was created.Cy Young has to be one of them along with Christy Mathewson & Walter Johnson.
Ahh, that makes sense. I will withhold my additional guess of Addie Joss.I won't spoil the answers but since none of yours were listed I'm going to assume they only count guys who pitched after the award was created.
I won't spoil the answers but since none of yours were listed I'm going to assume they only count guys who pitched after the award was created.
Ahh, that makes sense. I will withhold my additional guess of Addie Joss.
As a modified guess, I will go with Jack Morris in the Cy Young Award Era.
Today’s Trivia
The top pitchers that never won a Cy Young Award! #mlb #baseball #pitching #award
Buy tickets NOW for our All-Star event on Tuesday, July 16th in Dallas, Texas! https://shop.jomboymedia.com/products/jomboy-media-all-star-party-dallasSubscr...youtube.com
Name the Top 5 pitchers by WAR to have never won a Cy Young -
Looking at Bert's WAR alone (12th at 96.1), I wonder why it was even a question that he would make it to Cooperstown.I'm going to throw Bert Blyleven as a guess as well.
Yeah the fact that it took a guy who nearly compiled 100 WAR that long to make it in is a real crime.Looking at Bert's WAR alone (12th at 96.1), I wonder why it was even a question that he would make it to Cooperstown.
Along with the Career Ks and being a key Starter for 2 World Series Champions, 287 Ws, should have been a no brainer, IMO.
When you figure in "contribution to the game" with a surgery named after him that has extended the careers of thousands of pitchers, I think Tommy John should get in. He's 53rd at 62.1 with 288 Ws.
The Russian judge gives your efforts a 6.0This is not completely cheating, because I did not check to see if they won a Cy Young or not but in addition to Bert & Nolan, the 3 names that stick out the most to me by looking at the Career WAR List are:
Phil Niekro
Mike Mussina
Curt Schilling
The Russian judge sees you have redeemed yourself, comrade, and completely agrees with this post/methodologyLooking at Bert's WAR alone (12th at 96.1), I wonder why it was even a question that he would make it to Cooperstown.
Along with the Career Ks and being a key Starter for 2 World Series Champions, 287 Ws, should have been a no brainer, IMO.
When you figure in "contribution to the game" with a surgery named after him that has extended the careers of thousands of pitchers, I think Tommy John should get in. He's 53rd at 62.1 with 288 Ws.
Mussina is another guy I thought of but then went "nah, he wasn't that good". But he really was, very underrated.This is not completely cheating, because I did not check to see if they won a Cy Young or not but in addition to Bert & Nolan, the 3 names that stick out the most to me by looking at the Career WAR List are:
Phil Niekro
Mike Mussina
Curt Schilling
Was my favorite AL non-Twins pitcher of his era, until de donned them pinstripesMussina is another guy I thought of but then went "nah, he wasn't that good". But he really was, very underrated.
Yes, there are some that think you have to be considered great to be eligible for the HOF. Blyleven was never one of the top pitchers in MLB.with Bert, I think there was a feeling among some voters that he accumulated his numbers by longevity - and there was the giving up HR's issue. and during a time when "wins" were considered more important, Bert was 287-250 overall - a 53.4% winning percentage.
that's the dichotomy of the Hall. you have people in the Hall who were really great for a relatively short career - like Koufax. and then you have people who may not have been great, but they were really good for a long time - Jim Kaat among others. all depends on who's voting and what standards they choose to apply.
if you're going by raw numbers, Kirby Puckett is not a cinch HOF'er - but he shone in big moments like the World Series. Tony Oliva's career numbers are not spectacular, but during his heyday ('64 to '71) he was one of the best hitters in the game. If you've never checked it out, look at Oliva's numbers for those 8 seasons. He received MVP votes every season for 8 years for a reason. If not for that g-damn sprinkler head in Oakland, Tony would have been a 1st-ballot HOF'er.
I understand the overall point you're making but I don't totally agree with the bolded. His 1973-1975 seasons he was elite.Yes, there are some that think you have to be considered great to be eligible for the HOF. Blyleven was never one of the top pitchers in MLB.
There was an article a long time ago that talked about him (it was before he was elected). Essentially argued that if you were to start up a team and if you could have either Koufax or Blyleven on your team for the duration of their career, it's not at all crazy to pick Blyleven. There's value in being good over a long time.
I'd still probably take Koufax but it's close.
I should have said he was never considered a top pitcher in the game. In 1973, he finished 7th in the Cy Young. He didn't even get votes in 1974 or 75. Only two time All-Star.I understand the overall point you're making but I don't totally agree with the bolded. His 1973-1975 seasons he was elite.
Also he somehow put up a 6.0 WAR season at age 38, which was sandwiched between the two worst seasons of his career.
1973 was when the DH was introduced and he still had ERAs at 3.00 or below all 3 seasons. After his Rookie Year in 1970 when he had a solid ERA or 3.18 over 164 innings.I understand the overall point you're making but I don't totally agree with the bolded. His 1973-1975 seasons he was elite.
Also he somehow put up a 6.0 WAR season at age 38, which was sandwiched between the two worst seasons of his career.
On the radio this morning, Bremer seemed to imply that they are expecting some bad news on Paddack (done for the year). Suggested they might go after Paxton as a bridge to the deadline.From Dan Hayes’ column today, regarding trade deadline help (sounds encouraging to this optimist) -
The team is targeting starting pitching help before the July 30 trade deadline. As close as that deadline seems, Twins president of baseball operations Derek Falvey cautioned there is waiting ahead.
“A lot of this comes down as close to the end,” Falvey said. “There’s a lot of high-level discussions, and I know it feels approximate to the deadline, but in baseball hours and terms, it’s an eternity between now and then.”
Falvey confirmed adding to the rotation is the team’s top priority. He also suggested that because the National League wild-card picture is in flux (nine teams are within five games of the second and third spots), clubs remain uncertain about whether they’ll be buyers or sellers.
He suspects most clubs will take the final week before the deadline to see where they stand.
“What I’ve felt is the teams that are maybe more clearly ‘sell’ just believe that maybe they view the best deals will come in the last 24 to 48 hours,” Falvey said. “We’re going to have to wait to see how that all shakes out.”
I’d take him to be this year’s DallasOn the radio this morning, Bremer seemed to imply that they are expecting some bad news on Paddack (done for the year). Suggested they might go after Paxton as a bridge to the deadline.
The deadline is only a week away so they'd probably only need 2 starts max. I'd rather one of the young guys get those 2 starts. Paxton hasn't been good.On the radio this morning, Bremer seemed to imply that they are expecting some bad news on Paddack (done for the year). Suggested they might go after Paxton as a bridge to the deadline.
8-2, 4.43 ERA - better ERA than Halibut, Lopez, Varland Feista.The deadline is only a week away so they'd probably only need 2 starts max. I'd rather one of the young guys get those 2 starts. Paxton hasn't been good.
Looking at Bert's WAR alone (12th at 96.1), I wonder why it was even a question that he would make it to Cooperstown.
Along with the Career Ks and being a key Starter for 2 World Series Champions, 287 Ws, should have been a no brainer, IMO.
When you figure in "contribution to the game" with a surgery named after him that has extended the careers of thousands of pitchers, I think Tommy John should get in. He's 53rd at 62.1 with 288 Ws.
To your second point, Joe Morgan similarly bemoaned the analytics angle, even as it elevated his all-time status significantly.Yeah the fact that it took a guy who nearly compiled 100 WAR that long to make it in is a real crime.
I love Bert and for the most part enjoyed him on TV, but there's a certain irony to the fact that he is so anti-analytics, yet analytics paint his career in a far better light than "traditional" metrics.
His 48 walks and 1.455 WHIP are concerning. If they don't make a move at the deadline, then he'd be ok as a 5th starter replacement I guess. The comments suggested they would think about bringing him in just until the deadline. Seems weird to me to bring him in for just 2 starts.8-2, 4.43 ERA - better ERA than Halibut, Lopez, Varland Feista.
His stats are skewed by his control issues and his last four starts (his ERA was under 3.4 before then).
As a bonus he has playoff experience and is a hedge in case we have arm issues with one of our four regulars in addition to trade deadline starter; out rotation has extraordinary good health- third fewest starts missed this season at the AS break.
You can never have too much starting pitching and if we need a fill in down the stretch for the playoffs, I’m throwing him over Varland/Feista at this point.
Right there along with Fred "Bonehead" Merkle. Aside from his blunder, Fred was actually a decent player.Where’s your campaign for Mario Mendoza?