GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 43,062
- Reaction score
- 24,802
- Points
- 113
Death, taxes and Vikings turnovers
We deserve it. Another missed facemask.Vikings getting a gift of points this drive. Have no idea is Tennessee was offsides on the sneak and that hit is clean.
Guys will make mistakes, it happens.Giving up long passes to Will Levis is....concerning.
The best defense they've played. I am happy with the performance.The Vikings have gotten every call today. Another poor offensive performance with no ability to run the ball.
8-2?Our highest-paid player is a wide receiver.
Is that smart?
Atlanta Falcons are not a very good football team. getting run right out of Denver. Denver leading 38-6.
One half down, one half to go.
Goff ain’t the second coming of Montana, if he gets pressured.
Hope all them D-Town Denizens haven’t purchased their Super Bowl tixs yet.
I mean, they could have just grossly overpaid Darnold if that makes you feel better.Our highest-paid player is a wide receiver.
Is that smart?
I compared Goff to 4 time SB Winner Montana and not Darnold, so not sure why you compared his/Lions performance to Darnold/Vikings.Last week while the Vikes dominated the Jags throughout, because they couldn't get into the end zone even once, it was a struggle to actually win.
Against that same Jacksonville squad, Detroit scored 7 TDs and put up 52 on total points on the board.
2nd straight home game the Lions put up a 52 spot. Also did it against the Titans, 3 weeks ago.
Today the Vikings also dominated that same Tennessee, but again kept the score close.
Fortunately for fans of the Purple, style points don't really matter in the NFL Standings. They count as wins just the same and remain just 1 game back in the NFC North
My reply post wasn't intended as a critique of your comparison of Goff/Montana but more about the comment about about your "hope" Detroit fans haven't bought Super Bowl tickets yet.I compared Goff to 4 time SB Winner Montana and not Darnold, so not sure why you compared his/Lions performance to Darnold/Vikings.
If you need to prove me wrong, here goes kiddo -
I could be wrong, I often am. .
Just like every other human being, I’ve ever met.
Fortunately, my self-esteem isn’t regulated by an anonymous chat board or my possessions, but rather my by faith - the one true freedom which is available to all.
I mean, they could have just grossly overpaid Darnold if that makes you feel better.
Thanks for clarifying .My reply post wasn't intended as a critique of your comparison of Goff/Montana but more about the comment about about your "hope" Detroit fans haven't bought Super Bowl tickets yet.
My bad.Nor was my post an attempt to "prove you wrong" about anything.
Yes, they are, unfortunately. Loved Billy Sims & Barry versions, Campbell’s not my cup of tea. It would be amazing, if they won a SB and jumped the 49ers, who were seemingly positioned to win multiple SBs and now might have had their closed already.Just pointing out the Detroit Lions are really good. Could be great, even without their best defender. Their fans have every right to feel confident. It's 2 calendar years now, that they have been rather impressive.
The Best Thing Ever is if the Vikings make it to a SB before the Lions.Bookended around those 52 pt performances against a couple of AFC South dregs, Detroit has 2 impressive road wins against teams were in the Playoffs last year and are in contention this year.
DESPITE that, with the Vikings struggling to win, they are just 1 game back (plus trail the tiebreaker) currently.
Guess, Nick Sirianni isn’t such a bum, huh? Man he was hammered by the media, when they appeared yo have taken a step backwards.The Eagles can also have something to say about the #1 Seed/Bye and ultimately the NFC Title.
The Athletic did an analysis on JJ and how he impacts the offense: when he’s on the field and isn’t targeted vs. when he’s off the field - they found the offense is significantly better when he’s on (not targeted), due to the resources defenses have to allocate for him and how this opens up opportunities for other plays/players.Should the highest-paid WR in the NFL be expected to make his QB look good, no matter who the QB is?
Asked a different way: can a great WR make an entire offense look good?
Or, is a wide receiver — by the nature of the position he plays — somewhat limited in his ability to impact overall team offense? If so, it seems like a questionable decision to give a WR the really, really big bucks.
That's close.Not a catch!
JJ was a big reason why the middle of the field opened up so much on Addison's long TD.The Athletic did an analysis on JJ and how he impacts the offense: when he’s on the field and isn’t targeted vs. when he’s off the field - they found the offense is significantly better when he’s on (not targeted), due to the resources defenses have to allocate for him.
This is also shown that he has the highest receiving yards per game average ever and has accumulated the most yardage of any WR in his first five seasons. He’s also beloved by his teammates.
The term gets thrown around a lot, but he is one of one; based on his drive and determination, he’ll strive to supplant Rice as the .
That's close.
NFL coaches continue to make crazy decisions. So the Bears got to the 30 yard line with the clock stopped and :35 seconds left. They ran the ball, picked up 2 yards and just let the clock tick down to :03 before taking a TO. Then had a FG blocked at 45 yards. I don't get it, they just moved down the field, you can't settle for long FGs in situations like that. I get you have a rookie QB but get him on the outside or something where has options to throw it away or run if the receivers aren't open.