From the Parkinglot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,356
- Reaction score
- 3,720
- Points
- 113
Maybe, but that’s the problem with letting lame duck staffs stick around like they did. They went 7-9 and 8-9 the last 2 seasons and contacts were put in place in order for the current front office and coaches to keep their jobs and win now not for the betterment of the franchise.They need to gut the roster badly, but the Wilfs won't allow it. That's bad ownership. You need to let the people you hire do what's best for the team.
We are going to be screwed.Maybe, but that’s the problem with letting lame duck staffs stick around like they did. They went 7-9 and 8-9 the last 2 seasons and contacts were put in place in order for the current front office and coaches to keep their jobs and win now not for the betterment of the franchise.
Such a shame, might be the single best game of Cousins' Viking career. I don't think he had a clean pocket even once.
I think the change in scheme is a big reason for him not doing much. My guess is he’ll ask for a trade.Hey Danielle Hunter, weren't you bitching about your money situation while not playing.
Well, give a bunch of it back.
Wasn't for sports we wouldn't have useless stats at all.
when he is down in his normal stance, he does nothing.I think the change in scheme is a big reason for him not doing much. My guess is he’ll ask for a trade.
Well, only if they keep the 3-4.when he is down in his normal stance, he does nothing.
Trade him, yes.
That stat tells you how great Cousins was today.Wasn't for sports we wouldn't have useless stats at all.
I was saying this over and over again the last 2 years of the Spielman era. When you set up a “win to keep your job” situation, it’s not going to benefit you in the long term. Then, reports are that the Wilfs wouldn’t let the new guy(s) blow it up. What was the term- “reload while remaining competitive” or something? The NFL is devoid of top end teams this year. It’s the Eagles, Chiefs, and maybe Bills? There is never a better year for a mediocre team to make a run in the playoffs, so I’m not saying it’s impossible. But this D is going to get torched by a decent team in the playoffs. Can the offense keep up?And the old GM signed all the fossils to new contracts cause he had to win last year to keep his job. The decision is gonna set back the franchise. And yes the draft of defensive players has been terrible.
and if youre going to do that play, it should be on third or fourth down after you've already been stuffed 2 or 3 timesI just can’t get over that pass on the goal line to end the half. The plane was to have your running back throw the ball to a tight end who has caught 17 passes all season. That was the option chosen as opposed throwing the ball using you’re $40million quarterback to the best WR in the league or one of the other good WR’s you have on the team.
That stat tells you how great Cousins was today.
Sorry but the Vikings have to be the worse 10-3 team in nfl history
That football didn’t throw itselfAlso says that Cousins had a very good game against a team that coming in, had the worst Defense in the NFL.
We’ve lived with their failure since they came into the league. Sorry but until they finally win a Super Bowl I will always expect the inevitable. They will find a way to disappointThe Vikings are overachieving like hell this year, that's no secret. The beneficiaries of a shitload of luck. No, they won't make it very far in the playoffs, not with that defense.
But isn't this better than the alternative? How much would underachieving suck, and losing every break and bounce of the ball? It would be the longest season ever.
Year one of KOC and the new GM, a division title and making the playoffs, even if they get bounced in the first round? I can live with that.
Lions would have a better Division Record at 5-1 then the Vikings 3-3 in the Detroit wins out, Minnesota loses out scenario. That is the 2nd tie breaker after head-to-head.The absolute worst we can do this point is 10-7.
We still get into the playoffs, and almost surely still win the division unless the Lions go undefeated here on out? Not sure what the 10-7 tiebreaker would be there, since we split with them.
Regardless, more than likely we win the division and play at least the wild-card round at home.
Those who are trying to assert that it's guaranteed we lose that first playoff game, at home:
if we win, you don't get to post in the Vikings 2023 In-Season thread. At all. You're out
If Harrison Smith played, then they don't get get that silly TD to a wide open receiver. Then they don't feel the need to go for 2 and it's 14-14 going into the half.
The game comes down to two plays, then, both of which (as is normally the case) are "if they work, you're a genius, if they don't, then you're a moron":
- the wacky Dalvin Cook fake-run to a jump shot pass to Mundt
- the wacky starting RT Sewell is split out wide and then goes in motion and then they throw him the ball.
Theirs worked, ours didn't. And ours didn't work in the worst way possible.
Even if we just don't fumble it, we probably still find a way to score. Then we're talking that we're up 21-14 going into half.
Never know
If you are expecting failure then it seems by definition impossible for the Vikings to disappoint you.We’ve lived with their failure since they came into the league. Sorry but until they finally win a Super Bowl I will always expect the inevitable. They will find a way to disappoint
Lions would have a better Division Record at 5-1 then the Vikings 3-3 in the Detroit wins out, Minnesota loses out scenario. That is the 2nd tie breaker after head-to-head.
It’s Minnesota sports. Disappointment has been the theme since 91’If you are expecting failure then it seems by definition impossible for the Vikings to disappoint you.
Agreed.The Vikings could very easily win the last 4 games. The division is not in doubt. The only question is what their seeding will be. They'll handle the Colts this weekend to close out the NFC North, then we'll see what happens after that.