stocker08
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
- Messages
- 40,224
- Reaction score
- 25,033
- Points
- 113
I never said "nobody considers him a 4 star" I just said nobody considers him a top 100 player and also I never denied the fact that i said he isn't a 4 star however it is just silly to call him a 4 star when only one of the four sites actually gives him 4 stars and all four sites don't give him a top 100 rank.
Why are you tying top 100 to 4 stars? What if one class has much more top talent than another class? Sites can and should base ratings upon a players ability. ESPN rated him high enough to be considered a 4 star player. Why is that so hard to accept? Nobody is trying to say that he is a 4 star recruit, without question. 247 has him right on the bubble as well. You are simply incorrect to say that he isn't a 4 star recruit if one site has him as such. That's selective reasoning. I personally use rivals for most of recruit information, and they show him as a 3 star recruit. That doesn't mean that someone who leans towards ESPN is wrong if they were to call him a 4 star recruit.