2024-25 Gopher Hockey Season

Yes, another terrible take as going one on one against a goalie definitely never happens in a game. Certainly could NEVER help you win a game that just might get you past another team to improve your pairwise ranking to give you a better seed. Those skills that you just might improve upon in those situations if you did work on them in practice are so not necessary because those skills are NEVER used at any other time during a game. Yes, what a complete waste of time to work on your high end skills as they're just never needed... improving your skillsets could NEVER improve your pairwise ranking...
One on one with a goalie in a live game is different than having all the time in the world for some gimmicky approach (swinging really wide, slowing down, etc) in a shootout. Id like to see us better at shootouts so we could earn the points, but scoring on a penalty shot or shootout is a fundamentally different skillset than scoring on a breakaway during live action.
 

One on one with a goalie in a live game is different than having all the time in the world for some gimmicky approach (swinging really wide, slowing down, etc) in a shootout. Id like to see us better at shootouts so we could earn the points, but scoring on a penalty shot or shootout is a fundamentally different skillset than scoring on a breakaway during live action.
They don't score on either. Skill is skill.

This ridiculous streak probably wouldn't be here if Motzko didn't think he's some kind of genius instead of letting Cooley and Knies shoot in the shootout when they were here.
 

So... what would you suggest? An hour and a half of each practice devoted to one-ones with the goalie? But that wasn't his point anyway. He just said 3x3 hockey and Shootouts are a dumb way to settle handle things. I agree 100%.
I guess we just ignore the failures (which it seems like Motzko is doing and it seems as though you and the '92 grad seem to suggest), or you try and address it. You tell me what your solution is since you're asking me for mine. I never said I love the formats either. I'd rather go way back to a 20 minute overtime period and if tied, it's a tie, but these situations are a part of the game right now so you adapt. We have highly skilled players not performing in these situations. I certainly wouldn't go over board as your asinine suggestion would do, but let's see what you think smart guy.
 

92 grad lmao definitely born in 92 based on the hockey opinions
 



They don't score on either. Skill is skill.

This ridiculous streak probably wouldn't be here if Motzko didn't think he's some kind of genius instead of letting Cooley and Knies shoot in the shootout when they were here.
They had one shootout the entirety of Cooley and Knies careers here. They clearly do shootouts frequently. It’s a classic thing at the end of practice. Bob has talked about it numerous times. He pretty classically picks someone who’s hot in the game (zeimer earlier this year when he had 2 goals, Wood who looked great last night, Snuggy who is one of better shooters but seems meh in the SO) and historically has gone with the guys he says score in practice (think Brodzinski was like 0/4 in his time here).

Luckily they’ve been better on breakaways than the 0% they post in shootouts. Know where I’d rather score them.
 

I guess we just ignore the failures (which it seems like Motzko is doing and it seems as though you and the '92 grad seem to suggest), or you try and address it. You tell me what your solution is since you're asking me for mine. I never said I love the formats either. I'd rather go way back to a 20 minute overtime period and if tied, it's a tie, but these situations are a part of the game right now so you adapt. We have highly skilled players not performing in these situations. I certainly wouldn't go over board as your asinine suggestion would do, but let's see what you think smart guy.
Why such an ass? You criticized, and I asked you for your solution. Which you didn't give. And, you seemed to be addressing a comment that was never made by 92. In other threads I have given my suggestions for the OT format (which I have criticized). I'm not the one criticizing the shootout and lack of scoring on breakaways. I really don't have a solution. Nor would I rate it in the top ten things I'd work on in practice. You apparently would. So I'm simply asking what you would do.
 

They had one shootout the entirety of Cooley and Knies careers here.
I know, that's why I said the shootout. Two of the best players to ever come through the program and you don't have them shoot. Just dumb
 

Look this is a message board and we are all entitled to our own opinions and reality is we are just fans watching on our couch who have no impact on the games.

Am I disappointed in our poor OT/Shootout performances? A little bit, in the sense that they might cost us another B1G championship. But ultimately we have seen plenty of conference titles in recent years, so something that isn't really relevant to postseason play, really doesn't bother me that much.

Fine for others to disagree, but I just don't have it in me to get worked up about it.
 



I know, that's why I said the shootout. Two of the best players to ever come through the program and you don't have them shoot. Just dumb
Countless great players are not great in the shootout. Alex Ovechkin is below 30% for his career, Marian Gaborik was notoriously bad in the shootout.

heck a quick scan of all time NHL shootout % leaders has some pretty underwhelming names at the top. Croosby and Ovi don't even crack the top 100.
 

Why such an ass? You criticized, and I asked you for your solution. Which you didn't give. And, you seemed to be addressing a comment that was never made by 92. In other threads I have given my suggestions for the OT format (which I have criticized). I'm not the one criticizing the shootout and lack of scoring on breakaways. I really don't have a solution. Nor would I rate it in the top ten things I'd work on in practice. You apparently would. So I'm simply asking what you would do.
Well smart guy because you chose to be an ass and jump in with your asinine suggestion. Basically chiding me for wondering why it's not addressed in any way. Evidently you really don't think it's a problem and would continue to ignore. That's you, that wouldn't be what I'd do. I would create something in practice, no, not something that lasts the entire practice, but an attempt to try and address these problems and maybe make it a fun challenge to enhance these skills and attempt to make it more natural than what is happening now which seems to be creating anxiety and stress due to their non-performance in these situations. I'm not a coach, are you(?), so I don't have the answer but I'd at least discuss with the assistants and come up with something.. these guys are very skilled and it's been going on for so long I think something does need to be addressed. To me this is a coaching issue and again something that Motzko is not addressing, but I don't have an answer and who knows, maybe they have attempted to address, but I don't think so as I'm not enamored with our head coach and his abilities with these guys.

Apologies for not reading the threads you've responded to in order to see what your prior responses have been (regarding OT I guess). My bad as I'm sure there were some keen nuggets I could learn from.
 

Well smart guy because you chose to be an ass and jump in with your asinine suggestion. Basically chiding me for wondering why it's not addressed in any way. Evidently you really don't think it's a problem and would continue to ignore. That's you, that wouldn't be what I'd do. I would create something in practice, no, not something that lasts the entire practice, but an attempt to try and address these problems and maybe make it a fun challenge to enhance these skills and attempt to make it more natural than what is happening now which seems to be creating anxiety and stress due to their non-performance in these situations. I'm not a coach, are you(?), so I don't have the answer but I'd at least discuss with the assistants and come up with something.. these guys are very skilled and it's been going on for so long I think something does need to be addressed. To me this is a coaching issue and again something that Motzko is not addressing, but I don't have an answer and who knows, maybe they have attempted to address, but I don't think so as I'm not enamored with our head coach and his abilities with these guys.

Apologies for not reading the threads you've responded to in order to see what your prior responses have been (regarding OT I guess). My bad as I'm sure there were some keen nuggets I could learn from.
Thanks. Glad to hear what you'd do. Me? I have not coached beyond the upper youth levels. We used to end maybe every third practice with a shootout. Made it fun competitions. Did it work? Hard to tell. The best players at the youth level tended to be the best breakaway scorers as well. Would that work at D1 level? Don't know. And no... as I said, I don't think it's one of the top ten things I'd work on if I was Motzko. It is a concern though and I am not disputing that.

Didn't expect you to read through other threads. I was simply making a point. If you criticize something, it's fair to ask for a suggested solution. I was critical of the OT format elsewhere and offered a solution.
 

Countless great players are not great in the shootout. Alex Ovechkin is below 30% for his career, Marian Gaborik was notoriously bad in the shootout.

heck a quick scan of all time NHL shootout % leaders has some pretty underwhelming names at the top. Croosby and Ovi don't even crack the top 100.
Against NHL goalies and compared to the best players in the world. Anyone that watched those two play knows their skills in tight and ability to finish would have allowed them to have success in shootouts against NCAA goalies given the chance. Those two were light years better at hockey than all the other forwards on that team (Snuggerud being raw still as that point).
 



Countless great players are not great in the shootout. Alex Ovechkin is below 30% for his career, Marian Gaborik was notoriously bad in the shootout.

heck a quick scan of all time NHL shootout % leaders has some pretty underwhelming names at the top. Croosby and Ovi don't even crack the top 100.
top 10 goal scorers this year in shootouts
Ryan Leonard: 0/1
Aidan Fink: 0/2
Isaac Howard: 1/2
Jimmy Snuggerud: 0/2
Liam McLinskey: 0/1
Ayrton Martino: no attempts
Quinn Finley: 0/1
Joey Muldowney: 0/1
Ryan Kirwan: 1/1
Sam Harris: 0/1

Make it point scorers you add:
Cole Ohara: 0/2
Jack Devine: 1/1
Gabe Perrault: 1/1
Aidan Thompson: 1/1 (fun part from DU is they had one shoot out; it went 16 rounds with DU scoring 3 times and Omaha 4)
Trevor Hoskin: 0/2

Overall: 5/20. Even with really good players, it's tough to score. That being said, our inability to just have through pure randomness at this point is wild. It is part of what I hate about the shootout is everyone changes what they normally do, slow down, slide out wide, etc. Personally had this problem in HS where you get in your head on your breaks and finally a coach just stopped me and said you have this great move and it works and it was what I did the rest of the season on almost every break away and ended up with far more success. You're on bad ice and, to be honest, you aren't McDavid (and even he only scores 45% of the time). I'd rather they just go in with pace, make a move and treat it just like they would a midgame breakaway. Feel like they'd probably have more success

Disclaimer: I may be missing some as these are only "official" shootouts.
 

top 10 goal scorers this year in shootouts
Ryan Leonard: 0/1
Aidan Fink: 0/2
Isaac Howard: 1/2
Jimmy Snuggerud: 0/2
Liam McLinskey: 0/1
Ayrton Martino: no attempts
Quinn Finley: 0/1
Joey Muldowney: 0/1
Ryan Kirwan: 1/1
Sam Harris: 0/1

Make it point scorers you add:
Cole Ohara: 0/2
Jack Devine: 1/1
Gabe Perrault: 1/1
Aidan Thompson: 1/1 (fun part from DU is they had one shoot out; it went 16 rounds with DU scoring 3 times and Omaha 4)
Trevor Hoskin: 0/2

Overall: 5/20. Even with really good players, it's tough to score. That being said, our inability to just have through pure randomness at this point is wild. It is part of what I hate about the shootout is everyone changes what they normally do, slow down, slide out wide, etc. Personally had this problem in HS where you get in your head on your breaks and finally a coach just stopped me and said you have this great move and it works and it was what I did the rest of the season on almost every break away and ended up with far more success. You're on bad ice and, to be honest, you aren't McDavid (and even he only scores 45% of the time). I'd rather they just go in with pace, make a move and treat it just like they would a midgame breakaway. Feel like they'd probably have more success

Disclaimer: I may be missing some as these are only "official" shootouts.
It's not random. Have you seen the attempts? They're brutal.

Of the guys you listed the future NHL stars do better. Just like Hage did to us.

Leonard: 0/1 but the best goal scorer in the country and you think he doesn't bury breakaways like our guys can't?
Howard: 1/2 is solid
Other than 81 and Fink the rest of those guys in the first list are nobodies.

Then your other list the future NHLers all 1/1... Talk about a bad sample set to illustrate what you want to. The Gophers don't have future NHL stars up front. Just a few that will be solid (Snuggerud and Ziemer).

Bet Eiserman would have buried one by now if given at least two chances.
 

It's not random. Have you seen the attempts? They're brutal.

Of the guys you listed the future NHL stars do better. Just like Hage did to us.

Leonard: 0/1 but the best goal scorer in the country and you think he doesn't bury breakaways like our guys can't?
Howard: 1/2 is solid
Other than 81 and Fink the rest of those guys in the first list are nobodies.

Then your other list the future NHLers all 1/1... Talk about a bad sample set to illustrate what you want to. The Gophers don't have future NHL stars up front. Just a few that will be solid (Snuggerud and Ziemer).

Bet Eiserman would have buried one by now if given at least two chances.
I’m just listing man. Calm down. Our shootout failures are brutal and what I’m meaning by random, as in a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile.

Eiserman has shot once. He’s 0/1.
It’s tough to score on shootouts as well as on breakaways. That’s all I’ve said
 

I’m just listing man. Calm down. Our shootout failures are brutal and what I’m meaning by random, as in a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile.

Eiserman has shot once. He’s 0/1.
It’s tough to score on shootouts as well as on breakaways. That’s all I’ve said
What’s funny is a couple years ago when we had a really good record in 3 v 3 OT bonin had posts about how those wins didn’t mean anything because there’s no 3 on 3 in the postseason (which I actually kind of agree with at least partially).

All the guy does is move goalposts to support his conclusions. It’s tiring. Even in the face of data that contradicts his point.
 

In the grand scheme of things, the shootouts don't matter and don't warrant a second thought. But it has gotten to the point where it now affects the standings for the Gophers (which also don't really matter that much) and there's no other way to put it: 28 misses in a row is pathetic.

The more frustrating thing is I see the same issues on breakaways and those matter WAY more. You might only get one in a tight NCAA game and you have to bury it. These guys never score on breakaways.

In general it's just an annoyance with this team. Maybe they will back their way into a 1 seed, but the deficiencies, which have been there since game 1, have not gotten any better and make them ripe for an upset early in the tournament.

I have different standards than most people but IMO I will regain faith in this team that they can actually string four NCAA wins in a row if:
-They win the next four
-Win the first round (can be game 3)
-Win the semi
-Can lose the final, especially if it's at MSU

7-2 or 7-1 entering the tournament, to cancel out this 4-4-2 run over that past ten which has had them looking so phoned in so often.

There's also an underlying frustration considering this IMO is Motzko's last shot at a title in this "cycle", after the massive choke in 23. Next year will be a down year unless he somehow pulls off a Misa miracle as the recruiting pipeline is narrow and lacks first rounders (and ZERO goalies).
 

In the grand scheme of things, the shootouts don't matter and don't warrant a second thought. But it has gotten to the point where it now affects the standings for the Gophers (which also don't really matter that much) and there's no other way to put it: 28 misses in a row is pathetic.

The more frustrating thing is I see the same issues on breakaways and those matter WAY more. You might only get one in a tight NCAA game and you have to bury it. These guys never score on breakaways.

In general it's just an annoyance with this team. Maybe they will back their way into a 1 seed, but the deficiencies, which have been there since game 1, have not gotten any better and make them ripe for an upset early in the tournament.

I have different standards than most people but IMO I will regain faith in this team that they can actually string four NCAA wins in a row if:
-They win the next four
-Win the first round (can be game 3)
-Win the semi
-Can lose the final, especially if it's at MSU

7-2 or 7-1 entering the tournament, to cancel out this 4-4-2 run over that past ten which has had them looking so phoned in so often.

There's also an underlying frustration considering this IMO is Motzko's last shot at a title in this "cycle", after the massive choke in 23. Next year will be a down year unless he somehow pulls off a Misa miracle as the recruiting pipeline is narrow and lacks first rounders (and ZERO goalies).
I'd settle for we play a full couple weekends of competitive, smart hockey. Both PSU and OSU are good enough you won't dominate the entirety of the games, but we are better than both of these teams. if they are locked in and effort is there these should be both sweeps, but both teams are good enough that at the end of the day to me it's not as much about running the table there. Right the ship and play good hockey the next two weekends and start peaking for playoffs. It's mid-February, they need to lock in. 3-1 (in regulation) clinches the 2 seed and it's very important that they have as few weekends off down the stretch as they can.

As far as the window, yes this team is better than what we'll have next year (though there are so many unknowns in terms of who will be back, especially with how some guys have played over the last few weeks, and what can happen with the portal), but there will also be a lot coming back. They'll be a likely top 10 team again but I share your feelings that that missed opportunity is going to bother a lot of people for a long, long time or at least until (if) Bob wins one.
 


If they play 60 minutes at their potential this team sweeps the next four games, zero question. Can't give up the first goal like so often this year.
agreed. and you're spot on on the 1st goal thing. 12-2-2 when scoring first. 9-5-2 when not. Game is a hell of a lot easier when you're not chasing the game constantly.
 

Gophers down to #5 from USCHO today.

National champion USCHO ranking entering the tournament last four years (not five cuz of Covid)
DU #3
Qpac #3
DU #3
UMass #6
 

The last 1 overall to win it was DU in 2017. Then before that was 2012.
1 seeds to win: 24, 23, 22, 19, 17, 16, 14, 12
Non 1 seeds: 21, 15, 13
Of note, typically the final PWR and the USCHO look very similar. Quite a few more discrepancies in the poll vs the PWR now (DU at 6 in poll, 10 in PWR; BU at 6 in PWR and 9 in polls)
 
Last edited:

Yeah I think they do it by conferences if I’m recalling correctly. Snuggy will end up ahead of Fink imo as even though they don’t say it, they value team success and our best player is going to be on the first team.
lotta hockey left though so much could change
Snuggerud needs to step it up the next few weeks if he wants to get on the mural. Fink is on fire.
1739816146405.png
 


Snuggerud needs to step it up the next few weeks if he wants to get on the mural. Fink is on fire.
View attachment 35763
agree he does. As of now, Howard will essentially be a lock. The other 3 (as well as any ongoing later risers like Thompson, Hughes, Bump etc if they go crazy down the stretch) are competing for the last 2 spots and Snuggy currently is on the outside. Fink had a 0 point weekend against us last time. Would be real shocked if that's the case again but whoever has the better weekend between the 2 of them then probably makes the tournament. I'll be pretty surprised if MSU lets Fink run rampant on them this weekend
 

Someone just mentioned it but it is interesting... Obviously weak non-con schedule helps.

RW-RL
1 WMU: 18-3 (0.857) in 28GP
2 UMN: 20-4 (0.833) in 32GP
3 MSU: 19-4 (0.826) in 30GP
4 Maine: 17-5 (0.773) in 29GP
5 BC: 20-6 (.769) in 29GP
6 OSU: 18-6 (0.750) in 30GP
7 Qpac: 17-6 (0.739) in 30GP
8 DU: 19-7 (0.731) in 30GP
9 ASU: 15-6 (0.714) in 30GP
10 Kato: 17-7 (0.708) in 30GP
11 BU: 16-9 (0.640) in 29GP
.
UND: 12-11 in 29GP
Michigan 11-12 in 32GP
 
Last edited:

Someone just mentioned it but it is interesting... Obviously weak non-con schedule helps.

RW-RL
1 WMU: 18-3 (0.857) in 28GP
2 UMN: 20-4 (0.833) in 32GP
3 MSU: 19-4 (0.826) in 30GP
4 Maine: 17-5 (0.773) in 29GP
5 BC: 20-6 (.769) in 29GP
6 OSU: 18-6 (0.750) in 30GP
7 Qpac: 17-6 (0.739) in 30GP
8 DU: 19-7 (0.731) in 30GP
9 ASU: 15-6 (0.714) in 30GP
10 Kato: 17-7 (0.708) in 30GP
11 BU: 16-9 (0.640) in 29GP
.
UND: 12-11 in 29GP
Michigan 11-12 in 32GP
Kind of why I'm so interested to see what WMU is actually made of.
0-1 vs BC
0-1 vs MSU
1-1 vs Mich
1-1 vs Denver
20-1-1 vs everyone else (other loss was to CC, who they are 2-1-1 against). Non con wins are FSU (53), BG (37), Mich Tech (38), and AA (60)
 

Kind of why I'm so interested to see what WMU is actually made of.
0-1 vs BC
0-1 vs MSU
1-1 vs Mich
1-1 vs Denver
20-1-1 vs everyone else (other loss was to CC, who they are 2-1-1 against). Non con wins are FSU (53), BG (37), Mich Tech (38), and AA (60)
Gophers are
0-2-2 against MSU
1-1 against OSU
2-1-1 against UM

So not much better especially against top teams.

Spoiler: Slukynsky and Bump can absolutely lead them to a title.
 

Gophers are
0-2-2 against MSU
1-1 against OSU
2-1-1 against UM

So not much better especially against top teams.

Spoiler: Slukynsky and Bump can absolutely lead them to a title.
More just meaning I feel pretty comfortable knowing what the Gophers have as I watch them every single weekend and have watched a lot of B10 hockey and then some of the top flight teams (BC, BU, Denver, etc.). WMU the record looks pretty gaudy, but I don't see them every night because they're not on and the NCHC being really hard to read this year in terms of how down it is so it makes them harder to read.

As far as your spoiler, we'll see if Slukynsky is even their starter come postseason. Rowe is 15-1 as well and they've both been excellent. They do all the things that you hope for (score first/early, take very few penalties, block a ton of shots, and play sound structure) that the very staunch defensive teams do. If they win, seems like it would be in a QU/Mankato style from what I've seen of them.
Purely just interested as they seem like they would be a sneaky good choice to win it all with how they play that really no one is talking about.
 




Top Bottom