TonyLiebert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Messages
- 577
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Points
- 93
It's so the west coast schools have enough games they don't have to travel half way across the country for. Plus of the remaining Pac12 teams I'm sure they all have a pair in mind they would like to also join the B1G.Why 4 from the PAC12? I wouldn't mind scooping up a Texas school to get us a presence down there, have the Gophers play in Texas once every few years.
Washington no doubt would be a good fit for B1G's overall strategy. Still kinda hoping that Stanford/Cal is in the mix somehow - the San Fran media market is huge (but not necessarily a college football town) and the academic prestige of these two institutions doesn't hurt either.Washington football has been down as of late but historically it is very solid. And Washington has a very large following and adds yet another large media market (the conference loves big media markets). Unlike much of the PAC12, their stadium is large and they fill it. I have predicted this move to be an obvious one since the day USC and UCLA joined.
19 teams?My prediction:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Stanford (Helps get Notre Dame)
4. Washington (Media market, academics, athletics)
5. Cal or Oregon (Cal gets it if Stanford requires them, otherwise it’s Oregon).
More teams out west open up the late TV time slots for the west coast. If USC and UCLA were both playing on the road one week having a couple more teams can make filling that late time slot easier.Why 4 from the PAC12? I wouldn't mind scooping up a Texas school to get us a presence down there, have the Gophers play in Texas once every few years.
Cal and Stanford have no ties other than geography. Cal and UCLA are tied organizationally and fiscally.My prediction:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Stanford (Helps get Notre Dame)
4. Washington (Media market, academics, athletics)
5. Cal or Oregon (Cal gets it if Stanford requires them, otherwise it’s Oregon).
The 20th team would be Notre Dame or someone else. 5 West Coast teams makes sense for a pod, or 1/4th of 20 teams.19 teams?
Cal and Stanford have a huge sports and social rivalry. They are also both part of at least two academic alliances where they work together on research. So while they are not connected institutions, it’s possible they want to continue their relationship in the same athletic and academic conference.Cal and Stanford have no ties other than geography. Cal and UCLA are tied organizationally and fiscally.
Down the road it is going to be the:ND has, by far, the easiest path to the BCS/CFP. And it looks like its about to get much, much easier for them. I just don’t see them giving that up.
I doubt Washington brings in enough money. They are not a big name in revenue sports. I think we need to go after a TX school and a FL school. Make the BIG a true national league. Would also help with recruiting.
I am not sure how you can say that ND has the easiest path to the BCS/CFP when the format has yet to be agreed upon.ND has, by far, the easiest path to the BCS/CFP. And it looks like its about to get much, much easier for them. I just don’t see them giving that up.
That’s probably the reality today. It becomes especially true once OK, TX, USC and UCLA join SEC and Big Ten.Down the road it is going to be the:
SEC/Big Ten
Big Gap
ACC, Big 12, Pac 10
Basically, it will be viewed upon being top 3-5 in the SEC or Big Ten will be better then winning the other 3 conferences.
I didn't look it up but I am surprised.Top Programs by Revenue (Outside of B1G and SEC):
1. Texas (also #1 overall, by far)
2. Notre Dame
3. Oklahoma
4. Washington
5. Oregon
6. USC
7. UCLA
8. Arizona State
9. Clemson
10. Florida State
No. It can’t just “wind up” that way. Any changes at all requires an actual approval by Swarbrick, since he has a vote and all votes must be unanimous.I am not sure how you can say that ND has the easiest path to the BCS/CFP when the format has yet to be agreed upon.
For all we know it could wind up being Big 10 winner vs SEC winner for which ND would need to be a member of one of said conferences. It's quite possible those 2 Conferences break off on their own leaving all others in their wake.
Between commanding a big media market, excellent academics, historically good football program with a large first rate stadium, and big revenue… Washington is extremely attractive/intriguing as a potential B1G member.I didn't look it up but I am surprised.
It's so the west coast schools have enough games they don't have to travel half way across the country for. Plus of the remaining Pac12 teams I'm sure they all have a pair in mind they would like to also join the B1G.
Really? I guess we can agree to disagree. I have Bay area family that would tell you its a rivalry that is one day a year.Cal and Stanford have a huge sports and social rivalry. They are also both part of at least two academic alliances where they work together on research. So while they are not connected institutions, it’s possible they want to continue their relationship in the same athletic and academic conference.
I was referring to when the current agreement ends after 2025.No. It can’t just “wind up” that way. Any changes at all requires an actual approval by Swarbrick, since he has a vote and all votes must be unanimous.
The CFP would have to be terminated completely, and reformed, for something like that to happen. But reports are they are all getting along again, so that’s unlikely.