El Amin Fan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,975
- Reaction score
- 965
- Points
- 113
Nah f that. Get the damn call right.No it likely wasn't. But that wasn't why we lost. We lost because we gave a team that couldn't drive 80 yards and gave them two super short touchdowns.
Wrong Sir. It is the damn reason. BCS f city.No it likely wasn't. But that wasn't why we lost. We lost because we gave a team that couldn't drive 80 yards and gave them two super short touchdowns.
No it likely wasn't. But that wasn't why we lost. We lost because we gave a team that couldn't drive 80 yards and gave them two super short touchdowns.
That was close too. It definitely deflected off a MN leg...Michigan fans seem to think Brockington touched it before 10 yards but I think it was right at 10 yards.
Not reviewable because if they did it for one penalty, you gotta do it for them all then you’re reviewing holding all yearI don't get the mindset of we didn't lose because of one play it was because of the other one play. All of the mistakes aside the Gophers were in position to tie or win the game. You can't make that call. Also a play like that not being reviewable, why? What is the point of replay then?
I think it hit off Brockington, but was right at 10 yards after he was spun around.That was close too. It definitely deflected off a MN leg...
First sentence is correctIt’s a call you have to be ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE to make at any point in the game. 100% a blown call and it erased any chance. Wasn’t the only reason we lost, but was the final straw that took away the last good chance
Someone on twitter pointed it out that the ball hit number 0 in the knees just before the 45 yard line.
It hit him at or after the 45.Someone on twitter pointed it out that the ball hit number 0 in the knees just before the 45 yard line.
Well there’s a bunch of Michigan fans saying it was a horrible call so that says all you need to know
I haven’t seen a good view one way or anotherSomeone on twitter pointed it out that the ball hit number 0 in the knees just before the 45 yard line.
Just like the Michigan Int where his heel was most likely on the line but Fox decided to send two cameras to the game.I haven’t seen a good view one way or another
That was pretty weird that they didn't have better camera angles.Just like the Michigan Int where his heel was most likely on the line but Fox decided to send two cameras to the game.
Wrong. There are other penalties relating to being across a line that are already reviewable (see below). No reason offside on an onside kick couldn’t be added to the list of reviewable fouls.Not reviewable because if they did it for one penalty, you gotta do it for them all then you’re reviewing holding all year