50PoundHead
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 8,532
- Reaction score
- 1,684
- Points
- 113
I just heard about this option today and on it's face it sounds like a more reasonable choice. Yes, it opens up the "mob rule" option, but at least the decision would come from peer institutions versus an unaccountable organization with a history of overstepping boundries.
This would be interesting, but it reminds me of when I was on student council (way back when) and the principal left the disciplining of several students who had done something harmless (but really stupid) to us. Of course, we voted to exonerate the culprits and the principal went bat-crap crazy.
Seriously, if I were an NCAA member and would urge this be kicked back upstairs. I doubt very much member institutions are going to want to open up themselves to scrutiny on their vote.