You are arguing against an argument that no one is making.
The argument that people saying it was at least partially political are making is that race played a roll. It was the local connections and race. I simply do not believe it had anything to do with his track record as an assistant. I don't think we would have ever even considered another A10 assistant coach.
Race playing a factor shouldn't be this dirty little secret. We are constantly told that diversity hiring is important because diversity is good, so why would be an insult to say that something good (diversity) played a role in a hiring? It just doesn't make sense. Also - if race played a role in his hiring and you don't agree with that kind of thing, it's not Ben's fault. The guy has been around basketball and was offered a dream job at his alma mater, any issue anyone has with a diversity hiring is not an issue with Ben.
So for me, and I believe a lot of other people on here, it REALLY comes down to the connection with local recruits. Coyle stressed it during his press conference. The pundits brought it up constantly. You also (I believe correctly) brought it up as one of the main reasons he was hired.
When Eli King, Gabe, Dawson Garcia, most of the current team, Heide, etc. all turn down the U, people are going to notice. It's the tangible thing we were told he had that the 30-40 more qualified (on paper) coaches didn't have. Ben will be under a microscope when it comes to local recruiting and it's because of his lack of resume.