BarnBurner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 22,017
- Reaction score
- 5,748
- Points
- 113
Hi!
Especially when after 8 years your not even at 37 %
I've seen this talking point from you and it is inarguable. However, how do you square this with the fact that Ben was on RP's staff for the majority of those 8 years? None of RP's record falls on Ben?Especially when after 8 years your not even at 37 %
To answer the last part, yep, none of RPs W/L record fall on Ben. The head coach is the one tied to W/L record across all sports, not the assistants.I've seen this talking point from you and it is inarguable. However, how do you square this with the fact that Ben was on RP's staff for the majority of those 8 years? None of RP's record falls on Ben?
It’s odd how quiet Barreiro and Reusse and tc media in general are as the u bball program melts down. Maybe Coyle is smarter than we think.
Correct, if you wanted to play that game you could argue that Ben lead to a bunch of his wins because he was the lead recruiter on Murphy, Coffey, and Oturo. The right response seems to be that he gets credit for neither.To answer the last part, yep, none of RPs W/L record fall on Ben. The head coach is the one tied to W/L record across all sports, not the assistants.
Of course. What I was implying is that Ben isn't exactly a clean break from the Pitino era. Ben both a) bears at least a portion of the responsibility for the performance of the program, and b) owes a major part of his coaching development to that era and staff. He's part of the Pitino tree.To answer the last part, yep, none of RPs W/L record fall on Ben. The head coach is the one tied to W/L record across all sports, not the assistants.
He separated himself from Pitino.Of course. What I was implying is that Ben isn't exactly a clean break from the Pitino era. Ben both a) bears at least a portion of the responsibility for the performance of the program, and b) owes a major part of his coaching development to that era and staff. He's part of the Pitino tree.
The new strib piece Ben admits it hasn’t gone as planned. Oh.
It’s odd how quiet Barreiro and Reusse and tc media in general are as the u bball program melts down. Maybe Coyle is smarter than we think.
Hopefully that's a motivation for the future. Work on Plan B (and maybe C too) while working on Plan A.
Agreed but you do wonder if Coyle knew something about the media and boundaries.Maybe it's just too easy now and feels like kicking a horse that's already down.
Please share the full quote.The new strib piece Ben admits it hasn’t gone as planned. Oh.
The new strib piece Ben admits it hasn’t gone as planned. Oh.
Please share the full quote.
Here are the three quotes in the article:Please share the full quote.
None?Here are the three quotes in the article:
First quote: "We had to reevaluate just because of numbers," Johnson said Tuesday. "You've got to have depth so you can practice and go 5-on-5."
On Isaiah: "Since I got the job, he did everything right," Johnson said. "He had worked hard to elevate his game and taken great steps in leadership. He was feeling the most confident he ever felt … He's still a huge part of what we're doing. He's going to be around. But I told our guys we have got to be mentally tough and focus on the guys who are ready to roll."
On Recruiting: "When you walk in the gym now it's different," Johnson said. "I kind of see things through a different lens now, but it's all fun. I've enjoyed it. We've been able to get on the road. We were away for a year, so it's good to see these guys live and face to face."
None say what Spaulding claims...shocking.
Sure there is a connection to Pitino but not in any way that should follow Ben as he embarks on his head coaching career. Just a footnote from his past as an assistant.Of course. What I was implying is that Ben isn't exactly a clean break from the Pitino era. Ben both a) bears at least a portion of the responsibility for the performance of the program, and b) owes a major part of his coaching development to that era and staff. He's part of the Pitino tree.
The Pitino part of his resume isn't much worse than the rest of it though....Sure there is a connection to Pitino but not in any way that should follow Ben as he embarks on his head coaching career. Just a footnote from his past as an assistant.
If it's the piece by fuller "Ben Johnson trying to balance search for players this season..." He talks about having to reevaluate just because of numbers is the quote. "you've got to have depth so you can practice 5 on 5"
Well, Pitino had to deal with injuries and some gave him a pass and some didn't. in the end he got fired for his record.
So sorry Ben, I get it, but at the end of the day is about Wins.
Edit: Fuller also mentions how they are still waiting for their first 22 commit. I find it interesting he felt the need to mention that. Like many on here have mentioned, it is still early in the recruiting period, but to Marcus it was note worthy enough to add it to the piece. Again, just odd he included that.
This can be said about Tubby as well. Can you imagine how Tubby's resume would have looked if Al Nolan never got injured. If Mbakwe didn't get hurt, etc.
For me, with any of our coaches, I will forgive some injuries but if you have a large enough sample (say 8 years), eventually your resume is what your resume is.
If I hired an employee and he/she was late on the first day but they said "the roads were terrible" and it was snowing outside, I would definitely cut that person some slack. If after 8 years, they were failing to perform and one of the reasons was tardiness, I wouldn't look into those excuses. After 8 years, you are what you are.
Count on Ben having excuses.I don't think Ben makes what your average employee makes. Also probably different responsibilities.
My point was that coaches can't control injuries, they can control how they coach their players and how they try to develop them.
RPs biggest fault was he didn't develop his bench. haha, in fact when he was interviewed by some media member in NM and was asked what he would have done differently at MN, his answer was "develop a bench"
So I'm not suggest Ben should be disciplined right now for not having a full healthy squad, rather he can't use injuries as an excuse (unless he gets down to like 6 healthy players or something silly like that). His worth as a coach will be tested when the fans see how he develops his healthy players who might not be as good on paper as the injured ones.
I do not think Ben will make excuses.All teams have injuries, the best coaches feel for the player but do not bring up injuries as excuses. Colleges and communities each have problems, coaches work to over come them, not making excuses. The worst ones say they are not making excuses and then in the very next sentence make them anyway. Ben and Thorson are not whiners and are modeling the right programs.Count on Ben having excuses.
I don't really see what the difference in salaries has to do with anything, the point I failed at making was spotting a pattern compared to a one-off event.I don't think Ben makes what your average employee makes. Also probably different responsibilities.
My point was that coaches can't control injuries, they can control how they coach their players and how they try to develop them.
RPs biggest fault was he didn't develop his bench. haha, in fact when he was interviewed by some media member in NM and was asked what he would have done differently at MN, his answer was "develop a bench"
So I'm not suggest Ben should be disciplined right now for not having a full healthy squad, rather he can't use injuries as an excuse (unless he gets down to like 6 healthy players or something silly like that). His worth as a coach will be tested when the fans see how he develops his healthy players who might not be as good on paper as the injured ones.
FYI, the last 5 Gophers' kenpom year-end defensive ratings were (out of roughly 350 teams:we confused shooting lots of threes with a "modern offense" and never played defense.
FYI, the last 5 Gophers' kenpom year-end defensive ratings were (out of roughly 350 teams:
2020-21: 56
2019-20: 41
2018-19: 48
2017-18: 152
2016-17: 22
With the one aberration, those are not bad numbers. The problem comes when you find out that 56th in the country gets you 12th in the B1G. It's just a phenomenally good defensive league.
But all in all, the narrative that they didn't defend is overstated.
For the record, looking at offense, those same ranks were 76, 30, 52, 104, and 77 - slightly worse than the defense.
I love KenPom, but you’re right the better comparison is how rank in their conference.FYI, the last 5 Gophers' kenpom year-end defensive ratings were (out of roughly 350 teams:
2020-21: 56
2019-20: 41
2018-19: 48
2017-18: 152
2016-17: 22
With the one aberration, those are not bad numbers. The problem comes when you find out that 56th in the country gets you 12th in the B1G. It's just a phenomenally good defensive league.
But all in all, the narrative that they didn't defend is overstated.
For the record, looking at offense, those same ranks were 76, 30, 52, 104, and 77 - slightly worse than the defense.
Miserable on offense and defense in conference leads to terrible conference records and being let go.I love KenPom, but you’re right the better comparison is how rank in their conference.
Those 5 years (going backwards from last year), MN was 12th, 11th, 11th, 13th, and 2nd for defense.I love KenPom, but you’re right the better comparison is how rank in their conference.