I wish our university would set the trend of finally standing up to groups like the EOAA. Unfortunately, I don't think it makes sense for them to draw a line in the sand for a case involving athletes because the public perception would be that they are just protecting the football team. I talked about these offices last night on this thread. This stuff is happening all across the country to athletes and non-athletes alike. They have attempted to re-define equality, harassment, and consent (and a slew of other words).
Their definition of equality is essentially equality of outcome (which is obviously absurd) rather than equality of opportunity.
Their definition of consent is essentially non-regret (but that really only applies to women during sex). For instance, if I went to casino and agreed to make a bet but later regretted it. . .I still consented.
Their definition of harassment can include telling third parties the truth (like literally, I have seen these offices describe harassment as a person telling a third party "I didn't assault her, she is lying").
Now, I am absolutely pro-equality, I think anyone who engages in non-consensual sex should be shot and if these guys actually harassed her, I hope they are kicked off the team. I just will use the actual definitions of these terms not the bastardization of the terms by groups like the EOAA.
But yeah, I understand your frustration, but keep in mind that this is an issue at every college campus in the country. It's bigger than just the U.
