Apparently Jim doesn't understand the concept of "cutting your losses."
This is my stance as well...he's proving to be even more petty than I originally thought.
Apparently Jim doesn't understand the concept of "cutting your losses."
I'm not defending Souhan here (although I really find it hilarious that he riles this place up to the extent that he does), but that's the state of the modern sports media. We have entire websites (including this one) dedicated to athletic enterprises and with the advent of twitter and the like, constant attention is paid to the minuscule machinations of sports teams and sports personalities. In that respect, Souhan is simply a cog in a machine that provides a perspective to fans who constantly what more, more, more. I readily participate as a fairly active poster here and at other sports-related sites, so I'm the "pot calling the kettle black" to a great extent, but Souhan is employed on a newspaper sports page and a sports-related radio station to generate business and if the reaction to his tweet is any reaction, he's succeeding at what he is being paid to do.
When things like this happen, just think of the entire world as the World Wrestling Federation and it all makes a lot more sense.
The entire world isn't WWF. This isn't made up stuff. Real people. Souhan is getting much more attention because of his attack on JK than he could with his writing ability. I'm not sure I agree that he is generating business for his employer, and would probably guess in the long run the opposite is more true.
The entire world isn't WWF. This isn't made up stuff. Real people. Souhan is getting much more attention because of his attack on JK than he could with his writing ability. I'm not sure I agree that he is generating business for his employer, and would probably guess in the long run the opposite is more true.
No, it's not what the modern sports media is. Don't confuse posts on a message board with a sports opinion columns. What other paper would be publishing Souhan's crap? Would you see it on ESPN or BTN? He'd be gone in any other market but this one. If the reaction to his tweet is any indication, he's NOT doing his job - this doesn't help sell newspapers. The best thing the Star Tribune could do would be to fire him immediately. His replacement would certainly do more to offer something readers want than Souhan offers.
Have you ever read the NY papers or listened to sports talk radio out there? The Twin Cities market is unbelievably tame. We're duckies and bunnies compared to the T-Rex's that roam most markets. In a different market, the media would have incited the public to burn down Target Center instead of experiencing yet another year of Kevin McHale's inept handling of the Timberwolves, but he stayed on interminably and ran the franchise into the ground. Not exactly a pertinent case to this discussion, but example of the softball nature of the sports media in this market.
I don't want to start a fight, but how do you know this does or doesn't sell newspapers? Again, the StarTrib is a major market newspaper that likely runs all kinds of focus groups and conducts market research. Same with KSTP. If Souhan were truly a liability, he'd be gone in no time. Maybe this does him in. But if the StarTrib or KSTP fires Souhan, is it going to change your reading/listening habits?
market.
I don't want to start a fight, but how do you know this does or doesn't sell newspapers? Again, the StarTrib is a major market newspaper that likely runs all kinds of focus groups and conducts market research. Same with KSTP. If Souhan were truly a liability, he'd be gone in no time. Maybe this does him in. But if the StarTrib or KSTP fires Souhan, is it going to change your reading/listening habits?
.
the media would have incited the public to burn down Target Center instead of experiencing yet another year of Kevin McHale's inept handling of the Timberwolves, but he stayed on interminably and ran the franchise into the ground. Not exactly a pertinent case to this discussion, but example of the softball nature of the sports media in this market.
Who plays Souhan in the Hollywood adaptation?
I would love to sit in on a focus group where Souhan's ****ty work is received positively if only to meet the type of people that approve that type of garbage.
Souhan made a mistake and Kill is making a mistake in making any public acknowledgement of Souhan's mistake.
Have you ever read the NY papers or listened to sports talk radio out there? The Twin Cities market is unbelievably tame. We're duckies and bunnies compared to the T-Rex's that roam most markets. Not exactly a pertinent case to this discussion, but example of the softball nature of the sports media in this market.
...the StarTrib likely runs all kinds of focus groups and conducts market research. Same with KSTP.
When the program starts looking precarious, let me know. Much of what you're arguing on this issue sounds like it would be better received in the Souhan camp.if Kill did a Bo Pelini impression and told the press and the fans that none of this is anyone's business and they could do what he supposedly told Souhan to do, how would they react and would they be justified in their reaction?
To my knowledge Kill did not tell this fan base what he said to the despicable Souhan. This is rather ridiculous. A person is entitled to a certain amount of personal privacy and he has been more forthcoming on his epilepsy and cancer to the public than he really should be required to. He did it to advance awareness. Jerry Kill is a human. I'm positive. I'm not sure, however, whether you consider yourself to be one.
I like Kill and think he's a good coach and don't believe his epilepsy, at least at this point, is putting the program in any type of precarious situation. But let's say his health doesn't get better, we lose a bunch of recruits, and he still contends that everything is A-OK. The street has to run both ways.
Another potential veiled Souhan/Zulgad reference:
On his radio show on KFAN, coach Kill was asked about publicity and stories about him/them and he went on to discuss how they've done things in the past, and always reached out in the community. Then said:
"This one's been a bit different."
Clearly my opinion, but I believe it was in reference to our illustrious local media.
I love your screen name.
And to answer your question, I would say John Malkovich. I know he's up there in age, though. But he would still do soooo good as the snarky bad guy. Spacey would be my next choice.
They are harsher in other markets, but whatever this is goes well outside the scope of normal media/sports team relations. To me, this feels personal. Going back to the original firestorm, there is nothing wrong with the intent of the column. It was a fair question to ask. However, the manner in which Souhan did it was puzzling, offensive and just plain wrong. That didn't feel like a columnist trying to generate debate. Mocking someone with epilepsy? How that was allowed in this politically correct day and age still baffles me. One can argue that he wasn't mocking, but trying to equate the number of seizures someone suffered with Big Ten wins is making a mockery of the man's condition. Everything that is fair game is fine. Souhan went way over the line, never apologized sincerely and now it's clearly evident that he didn't like someone standing up to him, so he continues to push his agenda.I'm just saying if you listen to the ranting in other markets, it's much harsher than it is here.
If Souhan were affecting the bottom line at either of his employers, he'd be gone. If he were viewed as a mistake, he'd be out of a job.
I'm not defending what Souhan wrote and I like Kill, but I just laugh when this place goes hog wild over anything Souhan does.
Killme isn't a gophers fan, he's a Jerry kill fan.
I just get a chortle how Souhan can rile everyone up. As I said earlier, if he was viewed as a problem by either of his employers, he'd be looking for work. I'm not defending the guy. I'm just stating what looks like a reality.
And if you go to Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Boston, or Philadelphia, I can assure you that the sports journalism is much more rabid in those towns than Barreiro on his wildest rant.
You seem to be multiplying.I'm JerryKillFan.
Maybe some people choose not to live in those cities because of the environment you claim exists.
Maybe some people choose not to live in those cities because of the environment you claim exists. Just because a culture exists does not make it a model to be imitated. Maybe it's a good thing to resist the demise of morals, ethics, and values. And, maybe rallying behind a cause is a good thing. IMHO this community would be better off without Souhan.
You seem to be multiplying.
Malkovich would have to play it like his crazy guy from the Red films.
If there was any doubt that the Strib will continue to fully support Souhan and his crap.
The editor has a live chat now and basically gave Souhan a pass saying he needs to write "strong opinions"
What a load of trash.