btowngopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 8,282
- Reaction score
- 4,609
- Points
- 113
It would be so great if he manages to win more and leaves for another coaching job.I'd say 80% chance he is fired with 4 wins. 5 wins 50/50.
It would be so great if he manages to win more and leaves for another coaching job.I'd say 80% chance he is fired with 4 wins. 5 wins 50/50.
They're not paying that buyout. Not after this year. Plus Ben Johnson's likely out in March. They're definitely not paying both in the same year.I'd say 80% chance he is fired with 4 wins. 5 wins 50/50.
How many times are you going to ask this?If Kesich hits that field goal you people would still be calling for his head huh
That's fair. 2 buyouts in one year is a tough pill. Guess I better get more invested in hockey.They're not paying that buyout. Not after this year. Plus Ben Johnson's likely out in March. They're definitely not paying both in the same year.
He should be fired. The future is tougher not easier. If he can’t compete this year, he never will & it will be time to move on.I'd say 80% chance he is fired with 4 wins. 5 wins 50/50.
Agree. Tressel ball worked with the ability to utilize advantages. Great philosophy but not being practiced at this stage of Gopher ball. Gopher ball needs some learning to become Tressel ball. But as you say, that is not working. He needs to adapt. The question is can he? I hope so, but I have my doubts.PJ has done a lot of good things, but he needs to realize Tressel ball is not the way forward. In the modern game, Tressel ball still works when you have superior talent. I’d guess it only works about 1/3 of the time vs. equally talented opponents and 0-10% of the time against better opponents.
That’s a bad team. I would be less angry because wins matter. I don’t think PJ put our team in a great spot to win today and we lost - so I blame him for that.If Kesich hits that field goal you people would still be calling for his head huh
I think that would be a huge overreaction. Time will tell, but AK was a 53 or 54% passer in many tries with the Gophers. Brosmer was 62% yesterday. Disappointing loss and yes Brosmer did hold on to the ball too long several times, but there were glimmers of a good QB in there. Never felt that way with AK.Hate to say it, but AK was probably better than what we'll get this year by what I saw this game, and that my friend is saying allot about what I saw tonight.
NopeMiss me? -JK
Trust me I'm no fan of AK and definitely felt it was time to move on from him as last year was as dismal as it can get, or so I thought. I had very high hopes for Brosmer coming into this game BUT his size (have we had a QB smaller than him recently?) and his reaction to the pressure and what seemed like his inability to find the 2nd and 3rd reads, except for the dump offs, was revealing to me. I thought he would have much more pocket presence than he showed with all the passing he has done. I realize it was at a different level but I now understand why we got him and he didn't look elsewhere for his next step.I think that would be a huge overreaction. Time will tell, but AK was a 53 or 54% passer in many tries with the Gophers. Brosmer was 62% yesterday. Disappointing loss and yes Brosmer did hold on to the ball too long several times, but there were glimmers of a good QB in there. Never felt that way with AK.
Not having watched his NH tapes, I wonder if he hadn't experienced the amount of pressure that NC was able to apply before. I'm not gonna pass full judgement until we see him for a few more games, but I will agree that this wasn't the step up from AK that we thought it was.Trust me I'm no fan of AK and definitely felt it was time to move on from him as last year was as dismal as it can get, or so I thought. I had very high hopes for Brosmer coming into this game BUT his size (have we had a QB smaller than him recently?) and his reaction to the pressure and what seemed like his inability to find the 2nd and 3rd reads, except for the dump offs, was revealing to me. I thought he would have much more pocket presence than he showed with all the passing he has done. I realize it was at a different level but I now understand why we got him and he didn't look elsewhere for his next step.
Yes, it's only one game and NC is not a bad team by any means BUT once we get into the B1G, I think he might just get overwhelmed based on what I saw last night. To me, AK was an inaccurate passer who couldn't find the 2nd and 3rd level either, but he could hold his own if he pulled it down and ran. This guy will get crushed in the B1G if he tucks it in and runs.
It's early and I could be very wrong. Just relaying what I saw from the game. Was talking my dad on the phone during the game and he thought I was too negative. By the end of the game, he actually called me back and agreed, this guy looked like a High School QB running for his life at times.
AK did actually do just that though in our first game last year against Nebraska. Not saying he's going to be missed, just the comparison between the 2 after 1 game, doesn't look stellar for Brosmer.Not having watched his NH tapes, I wonder if he hadn't experienced the amount of pressure that NC was able to apply before. I'm not gonna pass full judgement until we see him for a few more games, but I will agree that this wasn't the step up from AK that we thought it was.
I will say that I don't think I could see AK leading the team down the field to give us a chance to win, at least not the AK we saw last year. That does give me some hope that Max has the tools and just needs to do some adjusting to FBS level football.