mnsportsgeek
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,015
- Reaction score
- 2,588
- Points
- 113
We are going 8-10 in the big ten. Fire the hell out of tubby.
We better get that extra point coming out of the TO from Dre's 3.
They really need a lineup shakeup, what was the total point production for Williams, Coleman, and Austin Hollins, 6-8 points. How can you win when the points from three of your starters is 8 points or something.
Also, I hope to heck Trevor was not faking. If we are going to embarrass ourselves with our play, we better not also be cheating.
Did I say something about effort? We need five gophers crashing the boards with reckless abandon there, and we got next to no effort.
Another Tubby failure by not calling a timeout to have the shot reviewed?
Another Tubby failure by not calling a timeout to have the shot reviewed?
It's not out of the realm of possibility that Elliason replaces Rodney in the starting lineup for a game or so to light a fire under our milk carton PF.
Also, I hope to heck Trevor was not faking. If we are going to embarrass ourselves with our play, we better not also be cheating.
Refs lost us another one with that shot clock violation by Wisky...
They can't review it for some odd reason.
It was clearly out of his hand
Really? This is what you're going with?
We are going to miss the NCAAs. Unbelievable.
We are going to miss the NCAAs. Unbelievable. This team is horse*&^!#*&^!#*&^!#*&^!#.
Don't know what game you were watching but it was a clear shot clock violation. I paused it on my tv and the shot clock is clearly at zero with the ball still on his fingers.
Is there a legitimate reason why this isn't reviewable? I have a hard time believing that it isn't. Isn't it also pretty standard for shot clocks to have the red lights that make it easier to spot violations or am I out of my mind?
Don't know what game you were watching but it was a clear shot clock violation. I paused it on my tv and the shot clock is clearly at zero with the ball still on his fingers.
Is there a legitimate reason why this isn't reviewable? I have a hard time believing that it isn't. Isn't it also pretty standard for shot clocks to have the red lights that make it easier to spot violations or am I out of my mind?
Because lots of horse*&^!#*&^!#*&^!#*&^!# teams make it into the top 10. We lost by a point. They said we had only ever won there once, and the Badgers were favored, it's not like this was some terrible loss. Northwestern was for sure, but I don't think this one is.
Someone took a picture of the ball in his hands and the clock at 0, so yes I am going with that one.
Just slowed down that shot. It's so close. I still can't believe the idiot announcers didn't even acknowledge it.
Really? This is what you're going with?
The Gophers' offensive woes are largely a result of a failure to go hard on cuts, or to set screens with authority. Watch how softly they perform "plays" on the offensive end of the court. This includes the dreaded inbounds passes, in which inevitably at least three or all four of the receivers basically walk on their cuts.