I'm pretty sure literally we haven't put Alex Foster at the four yet.
You aren't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer
I'm pretty sure literally we haven't put Alex Foster at the four yet.
You aren't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer
Is Joey a liability on the court? Well lets see. He plays as hard as anyone. Usually guards 4s that are bigger and faster but have never seen him hang his head. Instead he defends and rebounds and does whatever is asked of him because we are thin at that position. He can hit the open shot and is decent from the line. I think he knows his strengths and mostly plays within his own limitations. He may make a bad decision on occasion but kids do that from time to time. Plus I doubt if Coach Pitino would start him or play him at all if he thought he was a liability. So in my opinion he is not a liability and frankly the title of this thread is ridiculous.
it isn't literally empty, but it might as well be, with or without Foster. Learn to read budI'm pretty sure literally we haven't put Alex Foster at the four yet.
Yep. Imagine if he improves to the point where he can utilize that pump fake to drive in a couple of feet and find a wide open teammate by the hoop. Right now he pump fakes and passes all from the same spot.
it isn't literally empty, but it might as well be, with or without Foster. Learn to read bud
The thread title was formed as a question, not a statement. Obviously, I was looking for input. I didn't state he was a liability. I asked for others input. Take a deep breath.
That really hurts from someone who goes to the Texas Tech board to spread hatred towards our x-coach.
Jake, what I responded to was he left the PF spot totally empty. To change to a more pleasant subject, as we sit, we're not in a much better position at the 3 for next season. You may get your chance to coach our favorite team to 9th place yet.
This just in from Howie: Tubby didn't leave the back-up PG spot totally empty because Mav was there
This thread is one of the most epic fails that I have seen on GH in terms of trying to support an argument. Dpdoll can at least frame an argument even if it doesn't make sense. Howie is just throwing out a bunch of non-sequiturs. Thread title should be changed to Howie: Is he a liability as a poster?
Funny, was thinking while reading Howies posts in this thread of how he is trying to be a version of DP... DP at least is correct most of the time, disagree with his methods, but he usually has a valid point. Howie is just annoying.This just in from Howie: Tubby didn't leave the back-up PG spot totally empty because Mav was there
This thread is one of the most epic fails that I have seen on GH in terms of trying to support an argument. Dpdoll can at least frame an argument even if it doesn't make sense. Howie is just throwing out a bunch of non-sequiturs. Thread title should be changed to Howie: Is he a liability as a poster?
Funny, was thinking while reading Howies posts in this thread of how he is trying to be a version of DP... DP at least is correct most of the time, disagree with his methods, but he usually has a valid point. Howie is just annoying.
+1
In which case try this:The thread title was formed as a question, not a statement. Obviously, I was looking for input. I didn't state he was a liability. I asked for others input. Take a deep breath.
The thread title was formed as a question, not a statement. Obviously, I was looking for input. I didn't state he was a liability. I asked for others input. Take a deep breath.
Are you stupid?The thread title was formed as a question, not a statement. Obviously, I was looking for input. I didn't state he was a liability. I asked for others input. Take a deep breath.
In which case try this:
'Joey King: asset or liability? Discuss.'
Excellent suggestion. But I can't figure out where to edit a thread title. Anyone know?
Joey also has possibly the best pump fake in the BT. It's amazing how badly he gets people to bite on in considering he isn't a great shooter and really doesn't take that many outside shots other than wide open threes.
For a guy who is playing PF who should be playing SF he is doing okay. It is painful to watch him get an offensive rebound inside and then do everything but put it back up with power, but maybe he'll figure it out.
I don't think he'll ever be a true PF.
For a guy who is playing PF who should be playing SF he is doing okay. It is painful to watch him get an offensive rebound inside and then do everything but put it back up with power, but maybe he'll figure it out.
I don't think he'll ever be a true PF.
Agreed, Joey is not a 3 and I expect him to be our starting 4 and will average at least 20 minutes a game between the 4 and 3 positions throughout next year. He's highly coachable (based on HS) and works hard. Those types of players tend to find the court when a team is as talent poor as we are at the moment in those two positions.Two college coaches in a row didn't play King out of position and I think he will start at the 4 next season. I believe Martin will be ready for the big stage at some point next season, but it will take some time to beat out Joey. I thought he played well for a sophomore. Two different coaches played him almost 20 minutes per game.