westcoastgopher11
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2010
- Messages
- 2,448
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
duke is not a dirty player and this team isnt dirty either - only people you hear parroting those lines in these times are badgers and badger sycophants
duke is not a dirty player and this team isnt dirty either - only people you hear parroting those lines in these times are badgers and badger sycophants
duke is not a dirty player and this team isnt dirty either - only people you hear parroting those lines in these times are badgers and badger sycophants
Oh, don't kid yourself! I'm certain Beaver, Boilermaker, Illini & Wildcat fans are all echoing these thoughts or worse!
yea but we beat them all so who cares
Oh, I forgot Nittany Lion fans. That was probably the worst one of all and you didn't beat them!
Oh, I forgot Nittany Lion fans. That was probably the worst one of all and you didn't beat them!
Wait, is this a tally of who hates the Gophers? Not going to work. I have heard good things from the other fans about our program, but quite a lot of negativity surrounding the Badger fanbase from Nebraska and Iowa fans.
The Penn State kicker? Please
When in Lincoln last weekend, the Husker fans were overwhelmingly friendly. Several of their fans who initiated conversation with us expressed their distaste for and bad experiences with Badger fans... FYI...
Jazz is such a gay name. Pretty sure there's a show about transsexual teenager called I am Jazz
Minnesota has the most targeting calls in the county. Why? Not because they have committed the most targeting infactions, but because they have had the most called against them. Minnesota opposing teams have committed as many or more of these plays and they haven't been called. Conspiracy plain and simple. So now Minnesota is on a watch list for dirty plays/players. Doesn't matter that 2 of the 7 weren't even close to targeting, and 3 more were very questionable calls. Minnesota has actually committed 2 clear targeting penalties but have the reputation of having committed 7. And not one cal against a team playing the gophers even though mitch and others have clearly been on the receiving end of targeting hits. B1G 7 - Minnesota 0.
This. I can think of 3 off the top of my head that weren't called -- and I'm sure there's more.
1) Leidner against Iowa
2) Rodney Smith against Illinois
3) Steve Richardson against NW
These players weren't WRs, the plays happened quick, and our guys didn't suffer an injury or stay down after the play, so no calls. But clear helmet to helmet contact and "launching".
Most of us watch a LOT of college football. These hits happen ALL the time. Many aren't called. What's happening to MN this year has been BS.
No, he isn't. If you want to wag your finger at somebody, make sure you're right next time.
That's Barreiro's assertion, going so far as to say making him sit for one game isn't nearly enough. I can see his point. A couple of hits that essentially knocked the other team's best WR out of the game sure don't look good.
In watching yesterday's play back several times, it's most certainly targeting by the letter of the law. It's such a split second play, but it almost looked like Carr's helmet made contact with Duke first, not vice versa. You could see that he was woozy after the hit. Winfield essentially pushed Carr into Duke's path. Do you try and teach DBs to only make ankle tackles from now on?