disco
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2010
- Messages
- 4,136
- Reaction score
- 3,151
- Points
- 113
7 on 7 (and 5 on 5) exists now. I coach that as well. It's a really fun game, but it's not the same game at all.Maybe it’s 7 on 7 positions to start.
7 on 7 (and 5 on 5) exists now. I coach that as well. It's a really fun game, but it's not the same game at all.Maybe it’s 7 on 7 positions to start.
Are they formal clubs where you train together and compete year round, in full pads, except for the school season? Each household has a monthly bill? Etc?7 on 7 (and 5 on 5) exists now. I coach that as well. It's a really fun game, but it's not the same game at all.
Correct. Even the NCAA has strict limits on spring practice and specifically, contact. We're not going to see full pad, full contact winter, spring and summer club football.Not going to happen.
I did not suggest it would be different in the club.Even the NCAA has strict limits on spring practice and specifically, contact.
Injury risk alone is why "year round club football" impossible to fathom in this day and age.Are they formal clubs where you train together and compete year round, in full pads, except for the school season? Each household has a monthly bill? Etc?
Guessing not.
I’m literally saying nothing more than that it’s entirely possible for year round club football to be a thing.
No one has presented anything close to a valid reason for why it’s impossible.
I don’t even see why you wouldn’t want it to be possible, unless you’re consistent and thus want all clubs in all sports abolished. Fair in that case, but guessing no one is there.
Hockey??Injury risk
I would tend to agree, but the argument against that, is that the high school league limits kids to too few games, while their clubs do not. IIRC, that was the initial reason Shattuck dropped out of the high school league for hockey - they refused to be bound to the rules of the MSHSL.If I was King of the World, I would reign in all of the off-season club programs, because I think the HS programs should have priority.
and don't get me on Mom and Dad chasing scholarships for their kids......that is a really long rant for another time.....
I would tend to agree, but the argument against that, is that the high school league limits kids to too few games, while their clubs do not. IIRC, that was the initial reason Shattuck dropped out of the high school league for hockey - they refused to be bound to the rules of the MSHSL.
What other sports are doing has no impact on whether or not there will be spring or club football. Not happening here. Nada chance.Hockey??
No girls tear ACL playing club soccer? None get leg injuries playing club vball or bball?
You have no clue what the actual numbers are. Yet try to pretend to be certain on here. Dishonest
Of course, but the MSHSL knows that the lower number of HS league hockey games will drive a certain percentage of top players out of the HS system. I don't see this changing.Of course, the primary purpose of High School is education. Sports are a part of the HS experience, but in theory, the kids are there to get an education and prepare for college or some other career path. So the schools are trying to maintain a balance between sports, academics, fine arts and other activities and in theory will turn out a more well-rounded student.
What other sports are doing has no impact
Being a well-rounded student has absolutely nothing to do with how many extracurricular school-sponsored activities you choose to participate in.it gets down to this: do you want a well-rounded student
What replaces those extra-curricular activities? Church,YMCA?Being a well-rounded student has absolutely nothing to do with how many extracurricular school-sponsored activities you choose to participate in.
While, exactly to your point, in small/rural communities the school is the primary source and driver of those activities even being provided at all …. that’s not at all true at larger/metro locations.
The 2 big clubs I am very familiar with in the NW suburbs are easily over $4,000, maybe over $5,000. My daughter is a few years removed from club vb but it was over $4,000 back then for the top teams.It's really slimy. Club volleyball can be too. I was reading that club volleyball costs $3000-5000 before travel costs and uniforms/gear.
Ask the Totino Grace Head basketball coach. He owns a club and is independently wealthy. Interesting how their football program and basketball programs have had different trajectories. He’s not the only one. Shame on the complicity of their administration.Yup.
"I've seen your daughter play and she's pretty good, but there are some things I think she could work on to improve her game...things that we coach at Acme Volleyball Club. With some dedication she may even get a college scholarship, like some of our past players. Now if you'll just put down a $500 deposit to secure her place we can get her started and make her volleyball career a success!".
Yeah, paraphrasing, but this is basically the pitch her and a few other girls on her 16U JO team received a few years ago.
No high school sport should play 60 games.Of course, but the MSHSL knows that the lower number of HS league hockey games will drive a certain percentage of top players out of the HS system. I don't see this changing.
I don't know if it's the same in basketball, volleyball and soccer.
Players are playing way more than that if they're playing year-round.No high school sport should play 60 games.
Huh?What replaces those extra-curricular activities? Church,YMCA?
Northern Lights is in Burnsville? Or they were at one time.The 2 big clubs I am very familiar with in the NW suburbs are easily over $4,000, maybe over $5,000. My daughter is a few years removed from club vb but it was over $4,000 back then for the top teams.
As they demand.Players are playing way more than that if they're playing year-round.
No one ever suggested that what goes on in the typical fall season of high school football be converted into a year-round format of games.Football year round is not feasible.
Sure, and these things can happen somewhat through the school/the school football program.Speed, Strength and Agility Training are more important things to do year round. Those things are already happening. QB's, Punters, Kickers, Long Snappers, WR, DB's also need to work on their specific skills more and those do not need to be done in some formal practice setting (club). 7 on 7 is good for that skill development. It's not the same as real football, but it does help the QB's, RB's and WR's develop.
Great post. I'd add that where there are domed fields, they're pretty well scheduled up with other activities.Football year round is not feasible.
It's not something you can play in the winter - unless you have a domed field and there are not many 100 yard domed fields.
Spring practice isn't happening anytime soon here for a couple reasons
- It would take kids away from their spring sport season
- Grass fields in the spring would get torn up so bad they would not recover by the fall and be S**t all the time.
- The number of players needed to field a team for practice is considerably more than any other sport.
- In MN, they can practice as a team during the summer and that is similar to spring practice.
Along with that football is different than hockey, base and basketball, or volleyball in that the skills to play a position in football are so varying from one position to the next. Then those skills have to be put to use in the scheme of the offense or defense that is being used. Playing in a Veer Option Offense is completely different than playing in an Air Raid Offense same thing on the defensive side.
Great
Speed, Strength and Agility Training are more important things to do year round. Those things are already happening. QB's, Punters, Kickers, Long Snappers, WR, DB's also need to work on their specific skills more and those do not need to be done in some formal practice setting (club). 7 on 7 is good for that skill development. It's not the same as real football, but it does help the QB's, RB's and WR's develop.
WTF are you even saying here?No one ever suggested that what goes on in the typical fall season of high school football be converted into a year-round format of games.
Agree that's not feasible, and no one ever said it was or ever will.
Sure, and these things can happen somewhat through the school/the school football program.
But they aren't the focus. Exactly because: households are paying beaucoup big bucks individually to have their kids be in private clubs. They pay zero (directly), or they pay very little comparatively, to do the school programs.
Guess which ones get dropped if there is a conflict?
Solution: take the year-round training primarily, but also with a spring contact/competitive period, into the private club format. Now it's the priority.