SallysEnthusiast
Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2022
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 64
- Points
- 18
For those who select “fine or above” - I’d love to understand why.
yep. couldn't agree more. you get up to the ball and run whatever with some pace. you can always run clock when the FG becomes a gimmie and Brown had no interest in trying to give us more time (he may have if you get down to the 10 or so). 10 more yards and that kick's % odds go up by 25% (that's using college kickers statistics). we throttled way down at UNCs 32 which is inexplicable when you have one timeout and instead were relying on trying to "pop one" on possibly 1-2 plays to try and make it up when instead if you run it with the tempo we did earlier, you get 4-5 plays (and if you hit one on the first play, you can always run clock then!). Head coaches really don't have that many jobs but he's one of the worst clock managers in the entire country season after season. I still don't know why a guy like him can't look in the mirror and say hey maybe I need one of my GAs to understand the analytics and advise me on target yard lines, my guy's percentages kicking the ball, and what the play call/angle should be. either he thinks he's doing a good job at it (he's not) or he just doesn't understand it.I'm leaning towards bad at this point. His method of play it close and hope for the best isn't going to fly in the redesigned Big Ten. I mean....we got the ball back for that final drive with 1:42. More than enough time to drive down and get better field position than we had. Unfortunately.....we don't appear to have the ability to speed things up when needed. Tons of time left on the board because Fleck and Co. have the need to control everything down to the second....
If PJ doesn't find a good OC and improve in 2025 he most definitely should be fired. You can find a lot of guys who can do what he's doing for a lot less money.Here's where I'm at with fleck. If we end with 5 or less wins, 2025 is where he needs to show that he can get the team back on track. If 2025 is another 5 or less win season, he's got to go.
If he can get back to 8 wins this year, then he's taken a bit of the heat off his seat. Still needs to make some changes, but I wouldn't be ready to fire him.
You don't think 10 plays in 1:44 is speeding things up?I'm leaning towards bad at this point. His method of play it close and hope for the best isn't going to fly in the redesigned Big Ten. I mean....we got the ball back for that final drive with 1:42. More than enough time to drive down and get better field position than we had. Unfortunately.....we don't appear to have the ability to speed things up when needed. Tons of time left on the board because Fleck and Co. have the need to control everything down to the second....
I'm assuming they're specifically talking about the sequence highlighted. That was 4 plays in 1:01 and that included one time where the clock stopped after the play due to the incompletion/penalty.You don't think 10 plays in 1:44 is speeding things up?
I think what some folks are saying is if you wait too long, the ability to get a top up and comer goes way down.The choices here are ridiculous.
Temperature check? His seat is cool as a cucumber.
He is currently in no danger of being fired, unless a scandal erupts.
If his current trajectory doesn't change, I don't think if we go 2-10 this year his seat will be hot next year.
To some the writing is on the wall, but just because the writing is on the wall, doesn't mean the four options above are a fair set of states.
I don't fall in any of those categories, but if I had to choose, I'd choose so-so.
My general attitude is that anyone surprised by were we are hasn't been paying attention. I'd also say that unless and until we have a competent AD and an administration that has expectations and a commitment to actually be all the superlatives Fleck loves to use, but doesn't understand the true meaning of on the footballl field, it doesn't matter. At best we'd get more of the same like this hire. At worst, we'd get Tim Brewster the sequel.
The game has changed completely in the past few years, but will all the bravado, sloganeering, and LOOK at Meeeeeeeeeee! from our Head Cheerleader, the program is roughly where it was under Mason and Kill.
The only place were Fleck has stood out is his performance in Bowl games. Aside from that, he's been a louder, more obnoxious (to me) version of Mason and Kill who had their own set of quirks and failings, but at least coached to win after a few years as opposed to coaching not to lose..
There are a lot of people who disagree with me, but my opinion hasn't changed much since Fleck was hired. We'll see where his tenure ends which won't be for several years at the earliest.
Not sure Mase necessarily "coached to win" but certainly knew how to score points and hold on for dear life when the other guy's Defense and/or Offense woke up. Still, nice point and generally agree.The choices here are ridiculous.
Temperature check? His seat is cool as a cucumber.
He is currently in no danger of being fired, unless a scandal erupts.
If his current trajectory doesn't change, I don't think if we go 2-10 this year his seat will be hot next year.
To some the writing is on the wall, but just because the writing is on the wall, doesn't mean the four options above are a fair set of states.
I don't fall in any of those categories, but if I had to choose, I'd choose so-so.
My general attitude is that anyone surprised by were we are hasn't been paying attention. I'd also say that unless and until we have a competent AD and an administration that has expectations and a commitment to actually be all the superlatives Fleck loves to use, but doesn't understand the true meaning of on the footballl field, it doesn't matter. At best we'd get more of the same like this hire. At worst, we'd get Tim Brewster the sequel.
The game has changed completely in the past few years, but will all the bravado, sloganeering, and LOOK at Meeeeeeeeeee! from our Head Cheerleader, the program is roughly where it was under Mason and Kill.
The only place were Fleck has stood out is his performance in Bowl games. Aside from that, he's been a louder, more obnoxious (to me) version of Mason and Kill who had their own set of quirks and failings, but at least coached to win after a few years as opposed to coaching not to lose..
There are a lot of people who disagree with me, but my opinion hasn't changed much since Fleck was hired. We'll see where his tenure ends which won't be for several years at the earliest.
seriously get in there and spike the ballI'm assuming they're specifically talking about the sequence highlighted. That was 4 plays in 1:01 and that included one time where the clock stopped after the play due to the incompletion/penalty.
0:29 ran off between plays (1:17 to 0:48)
0:25 another time (0:41 to 0:16)
That's too much time.
I’m referring to your own, personal “temp” on Coach… also see the title of the poll “how do we feel about pj fleck”. No need to get crabbyThe choices here are ridiculous.
Temperature check? His seat is cool as a cucumber.
He is currently in no danger of being fired, unless a scandal erupts.
If his current trajectory doesn't change, I don't think if we go 2-10 this year his seat will be hot next year.
To some the writing is on the wall, but just because the writing is on the wall, doesn't mean the four options above are a fair set of states.
I don't fall in any of those categories, but if I had to choose, I'd choose so-so.
My general attitude is that anyone surprised by were we are hasn't been paying attention. I'd also say that unless and until we have a competent AD and an administration that has expectations and a commitment to actually be all the superlatives Fleck loves to use, but doesn't understand the true meaning of on the footballl field, it doesn't matter. At best we'd get more of the same like this hire. At worst, we'd get Tim Brewster the sequel.
The game has changed completely in the past few years, but will all the bravado, sloganeering, and LOOK at Meeeeeeeeeee! from our Head Cheerleader, the program is roughly where it was under Mason and Kill.
The only place were Fleck has stood out is his performance in Bowl games. Aside from that, he's been a louder, more obnoxious (to me) version of Mason and Kill who had their own set of quirks and failings, but at least coached to win after a few years as opposed to coaching not to lose..
There are a lot of people who disagree with me, but my opinion hasn't changed much since Fleck was hired. We'll see where his tenure ends which won't be for several years at the earliest.
Because we haven't figured out our NIL situation yet and he still has been able to recruit relatively well considering the context.For those who select “fine or above” - I’d love to understand why.
It appears Fleck doesn’t want to be here. He’s checking out, losing coordinators, and attention to detail is waning.
I agree with this (except the 0-12 by 30 exaggeration). As for the bolded, I think that will happen soon, likely after this year, if there is returned interest. PJ tried to make it happen with UCLA this past offseason, but they weren’t interested. His stock is declining.Coyle will never fire Fleck. Never. Never. Never.
Fleck could go 0-12 for the season while losing every game by 30 points, and Coyle would not fire Fleck.
It's not going to happen.
when Fleck leaves MN, it will be his choice - either to retire or take another job.
now, if for some reason, Coyle leaves MN first, then all bets are off. a new AD would not be linked to Fleck the way Coyle is linked.
but as long as Coyle is the AD, Fleck will be the Football coach.
Name a few.If PJ doesn't find a good OC and improve in 2025 he most definitely should be fired. You can find a lot of guys who can do what he's doing for a lot less money.