station19
Moderator
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 22,605
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
Exactly. As I've stated numerous times, performance had very little to do with it.
There you go making thing up again.
Exactly. As I've stated numerous times, performance had very little to do with it.
There you go making thing up again.
You quoted Teague as saying that he would've fired Tubby even if he made it to the Sweet 16. How is firing a coach after winning TWO Tournament games (especially one who is squeaky-clean) even remotely performance-based? You're working yourself into a corner here, Tubby Hater.
Because it would've been based on 6th, T-7th, 6th, 9th, T-9th, T-7th (!!!) instead of two wins during a 205-game span.
Even Monson went .500 or better three times in Big Ten. Monson!!
First coach since Bill Fitch in 1968-70 not to finish above .500 in the Big Ten at least once. Only two coaches since 1945 to accomplish that feat.
"Inept"...and yet produced Minnesota's best season in 23 years.
False.
So when your boss calls you in for your annual performance review, what you did last week is immaterial, but what you did 3 years ago is very important? Makes total sense!
"Very easy". No other school in the history of the NCAA had fired a clean coach coming off his own best season and the school's best season in 23 years. Ever. A completely unprecedented occurrence, and yet it was "very easy".
False.
Unbelievable. This is possibly your worst post ever, and that is a feat in itself. Like the NCAA tournament committee would say, you are judged on your BODY OF WORK. Six years is a little better indicator of performance than one game against a lucky draw.So when your boss calls you in for your annual performance review, what you did last week is immaterial, but what you did 3 years ago is very important? Makes total sense!
Unbelievable. This is possibly your worst post ever, and that is a feat in itself. Like the NCAA tournament committee would say, you are judged on your BODY OF WORK. Six years is a little better indicator of performance than one game against a lucky draw.
So when your boss calls you in for your annual performance review, what you did last week is immaterial, but what you did 3 years ago is very important? Makes total sense!
When Tubby was in the middle of his February collapse his last season, and people were saying that he should be fired if he loses in the first round of the tournament, weren't you the one saying that it would be absurd to judge him based on one game?
Ok. Three Tournament appearances in 6 years. Which other Gopher coach can say that? I'll be anxiously awaiting your response.
When Tubby was in the middle of his February collapse his last season, and people were saying that he should be fired if he loses in the first round of the tournament, weren't you the one saying that it would be absurd to judge him based on one game?
A lot more than that goes into judging performance. If it was that simple, Tim Brewster would probably still be here. After all, he made bowl games in 66.7% of his full seasons coaching the Gopher football team.
Terrible comparison. Smith's last season was his best. Brewster's last season was his worst.
What else ya got?
Ok. Three Tournament appearances in 6 years. Which other Gopher coach can say that? I'll be anxiously awaiting your response.
If it was a field of 68, Dutcher would've done it six times in eight years.
Ok. Three Tournament appearances in 6 years. Which other Gopher coach can say that? I'll be anxiously awaiting your response.
If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Dutcher's tenure falls well outside of the 23-year window that's so hotly contested by all of the Tubby Haters here.
We have had only 3 coaches which have had 6 seasons with the tournament field has been at least 64 teams. One of them got several years thrown off the books for academic fraud. The other one had to coach with restrictions on place from the other coach's cheating and still ended up coaching them to the best Gopher season in the last 23 years. If your argument is that Tubby did better than the guy who cheated so badly the NCAA came and tore our banners down, and the guy coaching with different rules (the sanctions) than every other coach, then you are correct. I want the bar to be a little higher than the first coach (non-interim) to fail to post a winning conference record in over 40 years.
Fixed.
Which season was that, exactly? The year we finished 4th and got drilled in the first round? So you like losing Tournament games? I prefer winning them.
Which season was that, exactly? The year we finished 4th and got drilled in the first round? So you like losing Tournament games? I prefer winning them.
Which season was that, exactly? The year we finished 4th and got drilled in the first round? So you like losing Tournament games? I prefer winning them.
If that is your preference, good for you. Some people don't like watching their team tank it year after year after year. Since you like watching it, feel free to skip over to the TT board and stop trolling here.