Really? You mean like the Marlins postponing a handful of games?If players out sick/quarantined starts affecting outcomes and games it will turn into a circus that no one will care about.
Funny you didn't pick St Louis...Really? You mean like the Marlins postponing a handful of games?
The narrative of the other conferences is that football players are safer if the football season goes on. They have a more disciplined life (practice, prep, etc.), better facilities to care for them (medical staff, tutors, etc.) and more. While some of those things continue with or without a season, the narrative is still compelling. We care enough for our football players to let them do what they love so they have the incentive to stay healthy. It is hard to argue that even if some or a lot get sick that having a season was still safer than not.
I hope Vandy or some school with no shot to win the SEC trots out a bunch of guys with Covid versus bama to show them what’s what. This is all so bizarre
There was?? Guess they didn't advertise the game very much. Was it on some obscure channel?It was great seeing college football, with fans in the stands, on TV last night.
No hand-waiving will ever be able to show that practicing football is safer than quarantining at home. If the player won't be safe while at home, that is his problem.I think I understand what you are saying and I think I agree, I think.
It was also great for me to attend a HS game on Friday night. There's no doubt that for many in America, life revolves around football in the Fall and doesn't feel the same without it. I'm still not sure how I feel about games being played and fans being in the stands regardless of precautions -- I'm truly torn on it -- but it sure "feels" good in the moment. The bottom line is that we can all argue until we're blue in the face, but only time will tell what the long-term consequences are -- both from the decision(s) to cancel and to play on. Reasoned arguments can be made right now, but any firm judgement prior to 5 or 10 years from now is almost meaningless and meant only to make the person arguing feel better about their own position.It was great seeing college football, with fans in the stands, on TV last night.
So, you don't believe in the concept of regret?It was also great for me to attend a HS game on Friday night. There's no doubt that for many in America, life revolves around football in the Fall and doesn't feel the same without it. I'm still not sure how I feel about games being played and fans being in the stands regardless of precautions -- I'm truly torn on it -- but it sure "feels" good in the moment. The bottom line is that we can all argue until we're blue in the face, but only time will tell what the long-term consequences are -- both from the decision(s) to cancel and to play on. Reasoned arguments can be made right now, but any firm judgement prior to 5 or 10 years from now is almost meaningless and meant only to make the person arguing feel better about their own position.
I don’t think they’re safer, but they aren’t less safe. And they’re certainly better off when you include non safety factorsThe narrative of the other conferences is that football players are safer if the football season goes on. They have a more disciplined life (practice, prep, etc.), better facilities to care for them (medical staff, tutors, etc.) and more. While some of those things continue with or without a season, the narrative is still compelling. We care enough for our football players to let them do what they love so they have the incentive to stay healthy. It is hard to argue that even if some or a lot get sick that having a season was still safer than not.
I watched part of it, not a lot because the NHL playoffs were on and my team was playing, but I thought the short clips of the players talking about what college football means to them was absolutely fantastic, just awesome; reinforcing what an important part of their lives it is, particularly for people who know they will never sniff the NFL. It's tough to watch this being ripped away from players at other schools that are not playingIt was great seeing college football, with fans in the stands, on TV last night.
how is canceling a football season related to admitting 'they'll' lose the election...? How 'effed-up is your logic?Like I've said before, for these southern, proud, football powerhouse schools and their respective states that back them, this is the psychology at play here, at this point:
having to cancel the season, is tantamount to admitting they'll lose the election.
That's the psychology of it, at this point.
They'll probably push on, even if people die.
It was on the rather obscure ESPNThere was?? Guess they didn't advertise the game very much. Was it on some obscure channel?
The options aren't play football and have players quarantine inside until there is a vaccine, they're play football or don't play football and have the players do what they're going to do. Realistically, players are going to hang out with friends, party, go to bars, etc. instead of quarantining.The narrative of the other conferences is that football players are safer if the football season goes on. They have a more disciplined life (practice, prep, etc.), better facilities to care for them (medical staff, tutors, etc.) and more. While some of those things continue with or without a season, the narrative is still compelling. We care enough for our football players to let them do what they love so they have the incentive to stay healthy. It is hard to argue that even if some or a lot get sick that having a season was still safer than not.
Whoa, WHOA, hey now, partner.... don't be going and throwing around logic and common sense in this place. You're talking as though some people are capable of being accountable for their actions or something. Pfft. RidiculousThe options aren't play football and have players quarantine inside until there is a vaccine, they're play football or don't play football and have the players do what they're going to do. Realistically, players are going to hang out with friends, party, go to bars, etc. instead of quarantining.
For schools playing football, there is a ton more motivation to not get infected because getting infected means not playing, potentially spreading it to your team and having your team cancel games, and potentially being the guy to bring down college football for the year. To most players that's going to be way more significant than the incredibly slim odds of death or hospitalization.
Good thing they don't have a game for 4 more weeks. Much better now than later, for sure
WTF, they are just gladiators to give you amusement.Good thing they don't have a game for 4 more weeks. Much better now than later, for sure
Good thing they don't have a game for 4 more weeks. Much better now than later, for sure
Its going to be now and later. Really hope they have the players best interests at heart. I have my doubts.
Or, I guess another possibility is that I played 4 years of college football and know what it means to these young men. What's being done to them is really shitty and awful and almost purely political quite honestly. They are pawns in this grand schemeWTF, they are just gladiators to give you amusement.