caliGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,809
- Reaction score
- 389
- Points
- 83
Reacting to Fleck's assurance it's no big deal is very different than actually thinking DT will be out for the year.Fair, but in my defense there absolutely are people overreacting. I mean some of the replies in this thread basically have DT done for the year based on a note that he was icing his leg and Fleck saying it wasn't serious.
And I understand why people are skeptical of anything Fleck says about injuries because he rarely gives out specifics and he has underplayed injuries on guys in the past. But there is a lot of jumping to conclusions that goes on in these threads that gets way over the top based on little to no actual information.
I don't expect Fleck to be transparent on injuries at all, as most coaches aren't. I do think he needs to rethink how he uses players coming off injury, particularly at RB, but we don't know if that's the case with DT. Based on what we've seen in the past, with Brooks and Ibrahim and even Taylor in a meaningless bowl game last year, he takes risks with his RBs that aren't in the best interest of his players health. Sometimes it works out ok. Sometimes it doesn't.
Football is a sport where people get injuries. If DT is hurt and misses time again, that will suck, but it happens.