Art Vandelay
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,383
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
So this woman with the restraining order is the mother of his child? Is that what I'm gathering?
So this woman with the restraining order is the mother of his child? Is that what I'm gathering?
Fair enough Nate. I think all the Gopher basketball drama is finally taking a toll on me.
When we start suspending players for what appear to be charitable acts of good will I think we've got other problems.
And to the people who've compared a TRO to a speeding ticket where you've gone 1 mph over the speed limit....put your daughter in the same spot and see how you'd feel.
without knowing any more details it sounds like the woman is a crazy bitch.
your argument is invalid
Above all I would hope I've taught my children to forgive and seek good will towards those who persecute us sometimes. His heart seems to be in the right place.
Eventually we will purge our basketball program of all misconduct and all of our players will be spotless, never having done a thing wrong. In fact the whole U of M will be perfect.
Are you aware of the story (if true) that the girl that turned Trevor in had harrassed Trevors current girlfriend causing Trevor and his current girl friend to extend the no contact to two years? It looks like it may have been a bit of a two way street - perhaps there were no perfect players. I think a jailing and a suspension is a little harsh for a "hope you are doing well message". Perhaps an appropriate response might be a warning and a reminder of what no contact means in this hyper communication era of twitter/facebook.
No, the woman with the no contact order is a ex-girlfriend from Trevor's freshman year of high school. The mother of his child is his current girlfriend, and she also has a no contact order with this woman.
And the judge won't care where his heart was. Pretty simple here. Judge; here are the terms of the TRO. Mr. Mbawke, did you violate the terms of the TRO? Yes. Guilty. Pay the fine. I'm guessing there was a reason Facebook was listed on the TRO if that's correct as reported. Probably more history than anyone knows but at the end of the day, avoiding getting tossed in the can for violating this TRO was a pretty easy situation to avoid. Goes more to decision making than anything I guess.
I'm not trying to make this bigger than it is but but the law seemed pretty clear here.
I think Trevor has been punished enough, regardless of his standing (starter or bench warmer) on the team, as much as people want to bring up his "past" and "Miami", in case you missed it, he was NOT, i repeat, NOT proven guilty. That means, and follow my logic here, it was not proven that he committed the crime. Meaning, it is NOT on his record. And also meaning, he was suspended all of last season for a crime, he did NOT commit.
So if you want to say his past warrants a suspension, you are saying he should be suspended for this no contact order and a "past" that includes transfering high schools (a very common thing). Transferring from Marquette due to injury (another very common thing) and then transfering to his hometown team (lastly, another very common thing)
And lets please, also, not act like Trevor is a stalker and that is why she got the restraining order. This was a mutual thing. If you believe what Trevor's GF says, this woman stalked her and their son at daycare! So yes, Trevor did a very stupid stupid thing. And the blame is soley on him, it is his fault no matter the intentions. But does your first (to my knowledge) criminal offense (a misdemeanor over a kindly worded fb message) warrant a suspension? I personally don't think so, if someone doesn't agree that is their right. But, to say he deserves a suspension over what happened in Miami (did NOT happen actually) is ridiculous.
Yeah, stay away from exes, not worth the trouble no matter how "nice" the intention is, as he's finding out right now undoubtedly.
So he's the one that extended the "no contact" order because of harrassment, but it's him that needs a reminder what "no contact" means?
So he's the one that extended the "no contact" order because of harrassment, but it's him that needs a reminder what "no contact" means?
Didn't he get 100 hours of community service in Miami?
So, really, what did Trevor do to have everyone call him a screw up. Those comments were valid with Royce, but with Trev, I don't think so. He has been accused of a lot of things, but the only thing he is guilty of is sending someone a nice message on FB. Anyone can have a restraining oder put on them and be accused of doing bad things, but really, what did he do? I could be missing something.
what don't you understand. He is accused of violating a restraining order. that is a criminal offense. doesn't matter what his sentiment was.
No. He performed 100 hours of community service in exchange for the charges being dropped. It wasn't a punishment. It was so that the DA could get out of this not looking like he really screwed up. Trevor agreed as he wanted it over with as well. The big stipulation of the agreement was that it was NOT an admission of guilt (i.e. a plea deal) and it did not show up on his record.
Basically, we have innocent until proven guilty. Trevor was not proven guilty, which equates to innocence. I don't care who the person is, that is the way our legal system works. Weather it is OJ Simpson or the guy in North Minneapolis. If you are not proven guilty, you are innocent in the eyes of the law and that means it is not considered a prior offense.
if a university or team rule is to be suspended for being charged with a criminal offense than TM should be suspended. shouldn't even be a question. he knew the conditions of the no contact order which are read into the court record and now inlcude no contact through social media outlets.
those defending TM have no clue. if true if violated an order for proctection that is justification for whatever the legal system does to him or the university. this might be inviolation of his agreement in Miami and have a much greater impact on him than a suspension from the basketball team.
+1what don't you understand. He is accused of violating a restraining order. that is a criminal offense. doesn't matter what his sentiment was.
Got it. Thanks.
Innocent is not a legal term as I understand it but then again, the majority of my law information comes from My Cousin Vinny.