I hate to belabor a point, but the silliness around rate of pay is tough to ignore. If Coyle was hiring the head coaching position for his University, call it Coyle University, there is zero chance he would have paid someone with zero head coaching experience, zero name recognition, and zero suiters to be competing against, the amount of money and protection Coach Johnson received.
However, on someone else's dime it is fine? It would have been 100% in coach Johnson's interest to take the job at a fractional amount. The school doing the hiring was offering an incredible promotion while taking on an inordinate amount of risk. It is not debatable. Why is there zero accountability on top of all the other zeros?
My usual disclaimers apply: Good for Coach Johnson, there is no need for him to feel bad for outsmarting seasoned bureaucrats who throw other people's money around like it doesn't matter.
We must also consider that Coyle is AD in name only with no autonomy to do his job and is simply a figure head on top of something that is fundamentally broken.
Which gets to my last point: when you don't know who to blame when something is broken it is a clear sign you are dealing with an incredibly poorly designed bureaucracy or an very well designed one depending upon what side of it you are on.