I never said the U made the hire because of the Star Tribune. My point was they were pressured to hire a black coach and the Strib was easily seen evidence of that. I don't for one second believe that was the only pressure. If you read the articles (it wasn't one, like you try to pass off) you would see that the pressure to hire based on skin color was immense. For instance read Souhan's piece:
Souhan is going for the throat with this. When you start making a rally cry to defund the U this is not some "observation" this is a call to action with a threat, a threat that university leadership are scared to death of.
In the Megan Ryan article you can see that even the Big Ten commissioner was applying pressure to hire based on skin color:
The entire Ryan article was written in a way to put Coyle on his back foot in regards to race and hiring. In addition to other quotes from people who can put pressure on the U. I am not here to debate if the number one thing that matters is race first and then basketball second, maybe for some people they will buy season tickets so they can see a certain skin color on the sideline even if the team is not that successful. I will just say if you don't hire for basketball first, then you will not get to the top half of the Big Ten. If you believe that they passed on better coaches so they can check the box, then you have to ask yourself why would they do that? That is what I was addressing. I don't believe that Coyle looked at the resumes of Ben Johnson, Craig Smith and Niko Medved and said I am so sold on Ben Johnson being heads and tails above Craig Smith or Niko Medved so much that I don't even need to talk to Craig and Niko because there is no way they can be better than a guy who has never been a HC and really hasn't been part of a successful program at the college ranks. If you think that is possible, you haven't done a good job articulating that case.
Next your weak logic string above was not my logic and inaccurate to boot. First off it wasn't one story. Second, "observation"? Well that is quite a purposeful understatement to try and support your argument. Neither was simple "observation", they were both written to apply pressure in this hiring process. There is also no doubt that the Strib would have hit the U with multiple articles after the hire if the box wasn't checked. Misdirection and trying to misrepresent what reality is confirms my take is closer to accurate and yours is not. If I was incorrect you wouldn't have to try and twist the facts. The Strib was putting a lot of pressure on, it wasn't a throw away matter-of-fact single article. It was multiple written articles written with proposed threats of cutting funding to the university, in addition what they said in the context of what is going on in Minnesota right now and you consider that universities are extreme left leaning institutions the pressure was immense. In addition there was pressure being applied from other areas, like the Big Ten Commissioner.