Based on what? Letting the school conclude their investigation?
This whole thread is about the players being 'unfairly punished' and now your changing your story to Coyle should be fired because he didn't punish them longer? Really can't make it up
Haven't changed my story one bit.
I get that there are a few of us that are pretty vocal and that bugs you. At this point we're talking past each other.
The key difference is that there are some people who believe that there is accountability for an atheletic director to be in charge. Not running things day-to-day, but in charge. And here's where I see the difference, there are some people on the board who believe in accountability for your actions or inactions.
As my signature indicates, if we want to change the culture, accountability needs to be brought into the situation. Claeys has been held accountable. Kaler and Coyle so far haven't. Kaler is up for a renewal in his contract in May. It is unlikely he survives this. He will be held accountable because of his actions, his inactions, and the damage he caused the University's reputation.
There is an amount of accountability that rests on Mark Coyle's shoulders as well. You're the only one who sees him as completely innocent. We can agree to disagree if he should be fired, but to deny there is any level of accountability for the fiasco this developed into is simply ignorant.
Someday you'll figure out accountability. And someday you may even experience that sometimes your held accountable for the things you didn't do when it is your responsibility. If the coach had been someone with Nick Saban's internal political clout, I might see the AD was hamstrung, but Claeys is the antithesis of the power college coach.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk