bigticket1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 1,567
- Reaction score
- 328
- Points
- 83
Based on what? Letting the school conclude their investigation?
This whole thread is about the players being 'unfairly punished' and now your changing your story to Coyle should be fired because he didn't punish them longer? Really can't make it up
Coyle was the university representative who received the police report in September that clearly stated that the recruit was involved in this situation. He had the right, and obligation as Claeys direct supervisor to demand that those players who directly involved the recruit in the situation (and also provided a minor alcohol) be suspended. The buck stops at the top, and as the AD Coyle did not do what should have been expected of him.