upnorthkid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 13,059
- Reaction score
- 8,007
- Points
- 113
lol at this whole concept. agree 100% on Rodgers getting smacked. do we make the playoffs? probably purely on the stance that the Steelers then have no QB and we beat them. Is this team anywhere near the upper echelon teams? NoPhil Mackey on PD just said Vikes would be super bowl contenders right now had they brought in Rodgers and his $12 million contract.
His argument is that Rodgers is the #12 rated QB. Also our defense is rated #1 over the last 7 weeks according to stats.
Mackey said the decision to not bring in Rodgers should go down as one of the biggest personnel mistakes in viking history. There is little doubt that KOC was intrigued with the idea last spring. However the hate toward the idea of bringing in Rodgers that was shown by Vikings media and fandom alike was too much for KOC.
Zulgad, who hates Rodgers with the heat of a thousand suns, grudgingly agreed with Mackey's assertion.
teams with a winning record we've beaten. Chicago. That's it. that's the list.
Rodgers is 23rd in QBR (lol at anyone citing qb ratings anymore). We'd have an ok offense and a good to great defense (so a slightly worse version of Seattle). You're going to string together 3 games, possibly on the road in cold weather with a pass first offense under a 42 year old QB having his 3rd straight below average QBR season because his name is Rodgers. That's literally the only reason anyone thinks this is because they've created some "mystique" around him. If you were going to pay that money, Daniel Jones signed for the same (their contracts are 350k different) and has given markedly better efficiency numbers. If you're saying a mistake was made, it was there. Not in not signing an old guy who plays a wildly different passing structure/system than what KOC calls