That's true, but we can still blow a gasket once in a while.......you know, like drafting Jordan Addison. LMAOYou literally have no skin in the game.
You literally risk nothing, playing with other people's money.
Last edited:
That's true, but we can still blow a gasket once in a while.......you know, like drafting Jordan Addison. LMAOYou literally have no skin in the game.
You literally risk nothing, playing with other people's money.
It's as if pick 11 and 23 will be hits if we keep them.It probably comes down to the adage, "you'll never get a hit if you don't swing the bat". The only guy I'd personally trade up for is Daniels, primarily for his immense upside and not because he's a "can't miss" prospect.
Even Tarkenton, who led the Vikings to 3 of the franchises 4 Super Bowls, was acquired via trade.
I don't have any faith in this organization trading up and selecting the correct long-term solution at QB.
Maybe we should stay where we are and pick a QB at #11. JJ McCarthy may be there at #11, Bo Nix should be there, and Penix may be there at #23.
It was a good move, I presume by Jim Finks, both trading him to NY and reacquiring.Yes and no.
Vikes drafted Tarkenton out of college (3rd round - 29th overall pick) during the team's 1st year in the NFL. (fun fact - he was also drafted by the Boston Patriots of the AFL).
Tark and then-coach Norm Van Brocklin did not get along. Tark demanded to be traded, so the Vikes sent him to the NY Giants in 1967 for multiple draft picks. Those draft picks were used to select Clint Jones, Bob Grim, Ron Yary and Ed White. (ironically, Van Brocklin left after the '66 season and Bud Grant became the Vikes' head coach.)
in 1972, Tark was traded back to MN for 3 players and 2 draft picks.
But if the 49ers don’t hit on purdy…..everyone there is fired right?This. It's a simple formula.
Blow all the gaskets you want, so long as you don't pretend like you have skin in the game.That's true, but we can still blow a gasket once in a while
Bolded: however the full analogy to this draft may well be that we're sitting at a 3-0 count and coach just gave the "no swing" signal.It probably comes down to the adage, "you'll never get a hit if you don't swing the bat". The only guy I'd personally trade up for is Daniels, primarily for his immense upside and not because he's a "can't miss" prospect.
First defender taken in the 2024 draft.We haven't drafted a defender worth a schit in 10 years. It's pretty much guaranteed we wouldn't miss at pick 11 if we went defense.
Or hell, just take the first defender in the draft at 11!I don't have any faith in this organization trading up and selecting the correct long-term solution at QB.
Maybe we should stay where we are and pick a QB at #11. JJ McCarthy may be there at #11, Bo Nix should be there, and Penix may be there at #23.
We haven't drafted an above average defender in 10 years.First defender taken in the 2024 draft.
Yep, that's exactly the same thing as the defenders we've drafted before.
We've come to expect troll dishonest from you.
Or hell, just take the first defender in the draft at 11!
If they suck this year, which seems all but guaranteed unless a drafted QB would happen to be Stroud (two years in a row!), then we'll be much better positioned, organically, for 2025 draft.
That's what I'd do, but KAM's job is on the line so I have no doubt he will blow this.
Just throwing shit at the wall, which will happen for the next 4 weeks leading up to the draft. The Athletic just threw out another mock draft with QB's going in the first 4 picks, but in THIS order:
1. Chicago - Williams
2. Washington - Daniels
3. Patriots - JJ McCarthy
4. Vikings - Drake Maye (Vikings acquire Nos. 4, 138 and 162 from Cardinals for Nos. 11, 23, 108 and a 2025 first-rounder)
Interesting potential move for us, but I think AZ fans will be irate if they don't end up with MHJ. Maybe they can quickly trade back to #5 right after our trade and have a net positive for them, but they can't walk away from the draft without drafting him.
Skol Vikes!!
It's hard to tell if this is purely a "best player" ranking or a "QB premium" type of ranking. Given Daniels and McCarthy being where they are, I assume it's the former. Which is crazy to me that someone could have Caleb Williams above MHJ, or Maye as high as #3, but whatever.Thought I would check out Pro Football Focus' most recent draft board. Interesting, to say the least. Of the top 6 consensus ranked QB's that everyone is talking about, here's where they have their Overall rankings in the 2024 draft:
1. Caleb Williams
3. Drake Maye
22. Jayden Daniels
28. JJ McCarthy
33. Bo Nix
46. Michael Penix
How would you rank them based solely on potential?Thought I would check out Pro Football Focus' most recent draft board. Interesting, to say the least. Of the top 6 consensus ranked QB's that everyone is talking about, here's where they have their Overall rankings in the 2024 draft:
1. Caleb Williams
3. Drake Maye
22. Jayden Daniels
28. JJ McCarthy
33. Bo Nix
46. Michael Penix
How would you rank them based solely on potential?
It serves a dual purpose for Harbaugh - he gets to hype up a former player, and it would benefit his team if JJ went top 4. I think it's moreso just a case of a coach gushing about one of his guys though.I don't have the foggiest idea. Not my area of expertise. As far as mental makeup, intangibles, maturity, command of what's happening on the field, leadership, et al.... I've heard the best things about Maye and McCarthy.
Good grief, Harbaugh just won't shut up about McCarthy. I mean, it's one thing to pimp your guy and try to help him out, which I'm sure all coaches do, but Harbaugh's praise has been incredibly high (which has nothing to do with what I said above, that's been from other sources). He says McCarthy is clearly the best QB in the draft
Harbaugh: McCarthy and the NFL Draft
Also typical pre-draft subterfuge to hype up the trade value for a team looking to move up to #5 to grab him.It serves a dual purpose for Harbaugh - he gets to hype up a former player, and it would benefit his team if JJ went top 4. I think it's moreso just a case of a coach gushing about one of his guys though.
Why are they guaranteed to suck this year? They've at least arguably improved the defense in free agency and the offense is missing one big piece at QB but it's not an untalented team. If we wanted to get a high pick organically we should either have 1: Signed garbage free agents to get to the cap minimum; and/or 2: Last season after the KC injury: Saved the pick we gave away on Dobbs, shut down JJ, traded Hunter for whatever we could get, and run with the garbage QBs on the roster or signed some other journeyman. Instead, we played to win in a hopeless season and now are signing talent.Or hell, just take the first defender in the draft at 11!
If they suck this year, which seems all but guaranteed unless a drafted QB would happen to be Stroud (two years in a row!), then we'll be much better positioned, organically, for 2025 draft.
That's what I'd do, but KAM's job is on the line so I have no doubt he will blow this.
The same people saying "Keep Kirk and try to win a Super Bowl" are now saying we're going to suck and have a top 10 pick without him even though the QB savings has gone straight to fixing the defense. It makes no sense.Why are they guaranteed to suck this year? They've at least arguably improved the defense in free agency and the offense is missing one big piece at QB but it's not an untalented team. If we wanted to get a high pick organically we should either have 1: Signed garbage free agents to get to the cap minimum; and/or 2: Last season after the KC injury: Saved the pick we gave away on Dobbs, shut down JJ, traded Hunter for whatever we could get, and run with the garbage QBs on the roster or signed some other journeyman. Instead, we played to win in a hopeless season and now are signing talent.
More likely they'll end up in the bad to mediocre range and a similar draft position as this year, then end up in the brutal to bad range, and get a top pick in what's being heralded as a weak QB draft.
I'm not advocating mortgaging the farm to go after a QB. I dug into the stats of the likelihood of getting a good QB by trading up. It's much more likely to fail. But I'm not opposed to trading up if they can get the guy they actually want. But we'll never know if they trade up and get "their" guy or just "a" guy.
I hope that the team is prepared to hang on to the picks they have and take Penix/Nix at 23 or hope JJ falls to 11 but I doubt it. The talent on the team now is too great and next year's cap space means the only piece of the formula missing for a '25 season SB run is a good QB on a rookie scale.
writers - including one from The Athletic - are now floating the idea that some talent evaluators have McCarthy ranked as high as the #2 QB overall - and suggesting that Washington could take McCarthy with the 2nd pick in the draft.
no idea how much of this is hype and how much is substance.
But - if there is something to it, then Vikes would have interesting choices - try to trade up to pick #3 or 4 to go after Maye/Daniels (assuming they are available) - take Penix/Nix at #23 (and get killed by the media for "reaching) - or trade back into the 2nd round and take Penix/Nix (assuming they are available)
honestly, I think I could live with taking best defensive player at #11, and then taking Penix/Nix at 23 -- or trading back to accumulate more picks and hoping that Penix/Nix were available in the 2nd round.
-----
now, if for some reason the Vikes don't take a QB this year - here are the top 2025 QB's according to NFL draft buzz....
1. Shedeur Sanders - Colorado
2. Drew Allar - Penn State
3. Conner Weigman - Texas A&M
4. Carson Beck - Georgia
5. Quinn Ewers - Texas