2023-2024 Gophers Basketball Schedule Thread

EG#9

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
7,087
Reaction score
1,732
Points
113
Not sure what the plan is here as many of these games can only hurt a teams resume. I am sure some people remember, but the Gophers were actually lucky to escape their non-conference last year without at least one really bad loss.
 


Roland Brooks

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,541
Reaction score
1,589
Points
113
Updated schedule and their KenPom rank last year

Ball State - 171
USC-Upstate - 254
Arkansas-Pline Bluff - 322
vs. San Francisco - 101
Maine - 277
Bethune Cookman - 349
New Orleans - 332

Avg rank: 258.

Getting more pathetic as we go.
Tommies updated non-conference schedule: Nov. 6: @ Cal Nov. 10: IDAHO STATE Nov. 17: vs. Cal Poly Nov. 18: @ Cal Baptist Nov. 19: vs. Portland State Dec. 6: MILWAUKEE Dec. 14: @ Marquette Jan. 3: @ Idaho Jan. 6: SACRAMENTO STATE GREEN BAY

What is the UST Ken Pom? It may be close to 258 without the Marquette game…
 

SelectionSunday

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
23,650
Reaction score
2,645
Points
113
Tommies updated non-conference schedule: Nov. 6: @ Cal Nov. 10: IDAHO STATE Nov. 17: vs. Cal Poly Nov. 18: @ Cal Baptist Nov. 19: vs. Portland State Dec. 6: MILWAUKEE Dec. 14: @ Marquette Jan. 3: @ Idaho Jan. 6: SACRAMENTO STATE GREEN BAY

What is the UST Ken Pom? It may be close to 258 without the Marquette game…
Average NET = 242.4

Average KenPom = 232.9
 





Gophers7633

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
862
Reaction score
745
Points
93
With the dire situation they are in regarding season ticket renewal (it's going to be bad) I would think they will try to add a couple of solid non conference games at home. Perhaps that is the thinking behind ditching the tournament against two tough teams. Why not bring the tougher games to Williams Arena as a perk to the fans and also give the Gophers a better shot at winning?

Since you said this, we've scheduled Arkansas Pine Bluff, Bethune Cookman, New Orleans and IUPUI at home. Avg. KenPom rating of 341 from last year. They ditched the Vegas tournament because 1 we are cowards or 2, the staff has no faith in this team. That's it.
 




bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
54,798
Reaction score
16,708
Points
113
As it stands now, this schedule is gross.
It sure is. If they are not working hard behind the scenes to line up a couple top 50 to 100 teams and at least one of them at home- this is horrible. It would be an insane move by the AD considering where season ticket sales are likely at (in the tank). You have to offer something to the fans and people get when they are getting ripped off. Sure the 10 Big 10 games are great but if the rest are scrimmages then it effectively doubles the cost per "real game" for season ticket holders. Why buy season tickets when you can just go to the games that matter- and it is easy to get into those games?

You can get away with a garbage NC schedule if you are a hot commodity and sold out. Not in this situation.
 


gopherguy15

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
674
Reaction score
616
Points
93
I'm not understanding the strategy behind this schedule. If you want an easier schedule full of mid-majors because you want wins (and Ben Johnson needs wins right now), I really don't like it but fine. However, then you need to pick mid-majors that don't typically fall in the 300+ group. You need to 'game' the NET as much as you can. Unless Ben Johnson has a crystal ball and knows that all of these teams will improve from last year? A Big Ten schedule doesn't automatically make a terrible non-conference schedule go away. I've seen plenty of teams over the years that purposely scheduled horrendous non-conference games to rack up wins, but then had surprisingly good years in their conference, only to get left out of the NCAA tournament because of a weak SOS. Not predicting that the Gophers are going to the NCAA tournament next year, but if this team does actually play well, a schedule this like could really back them in a corner.
 
Last edited:

restovich

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Messages
667
Reaction score
700
Points
93
They might actually have some games this early winter with attendance under 3,000. Fans voting with their feet, as it were.
 
Last edited:



SelectionSunday

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
23,650
Reaction score
2,645
Points
113
I'm not understanding the strategy behind his schedule. If you want an easier schedule full of mid-majors because you wants wins (and Ben Johnson needs wins right now), I really don't like it but fine. However, then you need to pick mid-majors that don't typically fall in the 300+ group. You need to 'game' the NET as much as you can. Unless Ben Johnson has a crystal ball and knows that all of these teams will improve from last year? A Big Ten schedule doesn't automatically make a terrible non-conference schedule go away. I've seen plenty of teams over the years that purposely scheduled horrendous non-conference games to rack up wins, but then had surprisingly good years in their conference, only to get left out of the NCAA tournament because of a weak SOS. Not predicting that the Gophers are going to the NCAA tournament next year, but if this team does actually play well, a schedule this like could really back them in a corner.
This 100%. Perfectly stated.

Even when you're not expected to be very good, a Power 6 program should at least put 3 games on their non-conference schedule that could be "helpful" if they win a couple of 'em. There has to be some "meat on the bone" in the non-conference in the event you have a surprisingly good season. We're running out of time (only a few games left) to do that.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
54,798
Reaction score
16,708
Points
113
They might actually have some games this earlyw inter with attendance under 3,000. Fans voting with their feet, as it were.
There is no might about it. There were some last year- they just didn't get reported as such because they reported paid attendance.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
54,798
Reaction score
16,708
Points
113
This 100%. Perfectly stated.

Even when you're not expected to be very good, a Power 6 program should at least put 3 games on their non-conference schedule that could be "helpful" if they win a couple of 'em. There has to be some "meat on the bone" in the non-conference in the event you have a surprisingly good season. We're running out of time (only a few games left) to do that.
A little hope here: I assume that games with better teams are a lot harder/slower to negotiate.

Playing the Gophers is no treat because our rating is so low yet you have Big Ten level players that can beat you. So you get the possibility of getting dinged for a bad loss....
 

formerlybis

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
467
Reaction score
563
Points
93
It sure is. If they are not working hard behind the scenes to line up a couple top 50 to 100 teams and at least one of them at home- this is horrible. It would be an insane move by the AD considering where season ticket sales are likely at (in the tank). You have to offer something to the fans and people get when they are getting ripped off. Sure the 10 Big 10 games are great but if the rest are scrimmages then it effectively doubles the cost per "real game" for season ticket holders. Why buy season tickets when you can just go to the games that matter- and it is easy to get into those games?

You can get away with a garbage NC schedule if you are a hot commodity and sold out. Not in this situation.
With the revenue from the B1G TV contracts, ticket sales don't have to be the primary objective. It's cementing them as the p*ssiest program in all of college basketball, but there is a logic to it, and thus, not insane. Fans? Way down on the list of priorities - unless they can donate to the NIL fund - then you'll get asked to go get a latte.
 

SelectionSunday

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
23,650
Reaction score
2,645
Points
113
A little hope here: I assume that games with better teams are a lot harder/slower to negotiate.

Playing the Gophers is no treat because our rating is so low yet you have Big Ten level players that can beat you. So you get the possibility of getting dinged for a bad loss....
Therein lies the problem.

We're currently a program that (in non-conference) is considered a bad loss. ... and we play in the Big Ten.
 

Gophers7633

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
862
Reaction score
745
Points
93
A little hope here: I assume that games with better teams are a lot harder/slower to negotiate.

Playing the Gophers is no treat because our rating is so low yet you have Big Ten level players that can beat you. So you get the possibility of getting dinged for a bad loss....

The writing was on the wall when we backed out of Vegas like cowards. At that point, just about every P6 team was already in an early season tournament, or already had an MTE lined up. Hell we aren't even scheduling good mid majors, this is the bottom of D1.

We'll go undefeated in OOC, get our 5 league wins and suddenly 16-15 will look like a major improvement. Hope the administration doesn't fall for it.
 

Spaulding!No!

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Messages
8,364
Reaction score
4,355
Points
113
Without that OSU win this team would be heading toward the BenNW line.
 

60's Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
8,219
Reaction score
3,186
Points
113
The writing was on the wall when we backed out of Vegas like cowards. At that point, just about every P6 team was already in an early season tournament, or already had an MTE lined up. Hell we aren't even scheduling good mid majors, this is the bottom of D1.

We'll go undefeated in OOC, get our 5 league wins and suddenly 16-15 will look like a major improvement. Hope the administration doesn't fall for it.
I wish I felt that was how it'll go...you optimist you.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
54,798
Reaction score
16,708
Points
113
The writing was on the wall when we backed out of Vegas like cowards. At that point, just about every P6 team was already in an early season tournament, or already had an MTE lined up. Hell we aren't even scheduling good mid majors, this is the bottom of D1.

We'll go undefeated in OOC, get our 5 league wins and suddenly 16-15 will look like a major improvement. Hope the administration doesn't fall for it.
It's a head scratcher. While I think the coaches help arrange the schedule- isn't the administration in on it? I would assume so.
 

Zeppelin Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,676
Reaction score
997
Points
113
It sure is. If they are not working hard behind the scenes to line up a couple top 50 to 100 teams and at least one of them at home- this is horrible. It would be an insane move by the AD considering where season ticket sales are likely at (in the tank). You have to offer something to the fans and people get when they are getting ripped off. Sure the 10 Big 10 games are great but if the rest are scrimmages then it effectively doubles the cost per "real game" for season ticket holders. Why buy season tickets when you can just go to the games that matter- and it is easy to get into those games?

You can get away with a garbage NC schedule if you are a hot commodity and sold out. Not in this situation.
It's incredibly insulting.

Supporting the program with my 2 season tickets...pretty hard not to feel like an absolute sucker right now. They better have at least 1-2 decent opponents lined up.
 

Zeppelin Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,676
Reaction score
997
Points
113
Last year- we had UNLV (neutral), VA Tech (road), Mississippi St and DePaul (home).

All of those are FAR better games than anything we currently have lined up.
 


bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
54,798
Reaction score
16,708
Points
113
No, it's all on the coaches.
Not to be Marisa Tomei here but...are you sure? The administration has to approve the payouts to visitors and I feel certain they would have to ok tournaments, etc. financially.
 


howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
75,905
Reaction score
32,000
Points
113
The writing was on the wall when we backed out of Vegas like cowards. At that point, just about every P6 team was already in an early season tournament, or already had an MTE lined up. Hell we aren't even scheduling good mid majors, this is the bottom of D1.

We'll go undefeated in OOC, get our 5 league wins and suddenly 16-15 will look like a major improvement. Hope the administration doesn't fall for it.
There's no doubt, a winning record based on beating up cupcakes is the goal of this travesty. But even with this pathetic schedule, I don't think they'll go undefeated in the non-conference. I certainly wouldn't have them favored against San Francisco.
 

formerlybis

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
467
Reaction score
563
Points
93
No, it's all on the coaches.
Respectfully, I would have assumed that the Athletic Department would have some role in negotiating the financial deals with the opponent schools. It could be a standard contract for these "buy" schools, but I'd assume - perhaps wrongly - that it's different for a P6 opponent.
 





Top Bottom