GophersOnTheRise
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2008
- Messages
- 3,751
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Actually, it is. The NCAA, whose opinion on the subject is the only one that truly matters, agrees with me.
Let me create a scenrio here and see how consistent you are with your logic. Let's say you see your neighbor steal your car one day. You see them do it and are 100% certain it was him, but the police can't find the car or any evidence that they took it. A judge determines that he is "innocent" due to insufficient evidence and he goes on with a clean record. Since the law says that he didn't steal it, do you say "Oh, i guess he didn't steal it then. My car must still be on the street and just turned invisible for some reason?" Or do you know what actually happened and understand that in reality a court of law doesn't actually decide what does and doesn't happen (similar to the NCAA)?