Search results

Know something before I back talk? Ok big guy. I was responding to a post where you are asking Minnesota to be “no nonsense” and to “run the ball”. That is exactly what PJ wants to do. He loves 10 minute drives more than Mike fing Zimmer. now...Maybe you don’t like PJ’s persona, but he is...

What are you talking about? PJ is one of the most conservative football coaches out there. What “gimmicks and flash” are you talking about? PJ is a great curiosity. Bravado and new school thinking when it comes to recruiting and running the program, yet conservative to the core when it...

Second straight week of coaching malpractice by PJ. There is no reason to have Mo, Rashod, et al on the field for that final drive. If Bateman gets seriously hurt? How would that be rationalized? Mo is being run into the ground, we supposedly have a stable of young backs...get them some...

I am salty right now...but the above from Kirk is absolutely brilliant.

Mike Sanford is not helping him out either. Aside from the issue of not getting off his first read, he has indeed regressed. Bad footwork, forced throws. It is to the point where they don’t trust him on 3rd and 6 out of a timeout.

Back to the topic at hand...Tanner Morgan. Has he regressed? I really do not think so, it is the same Tanner Morgan. The one thing he struggles with is getting off his first read. In the first 3 games we really have not seen any improvement in that area. He locks onto one receiver. If that...

If you actually read what I posted I said “the 2nd half of the 4th quarter”. We were up 35-14 at that point. At a bare minimum Mo and Bateman did not need to be on the field. Also, I said nothing about “going conservative.” I simply said get backups in the game. The backups can still run...

That didn’t age well. 😂

Good win. Illinois is terrible. There was absolutely zero reason for Mo or Tanner or Bateman to be on the field the 2nd half of the 4th quarter. Other guys need reps and it is obvious they are going to lean on Mo for the remainder of the season. We play Iowa in 6 days and his backup was...

I don’t disagree that being multiple is helpful. It felt like on Saturday we had more 2TE sets than we did last year and there were definitely more throws to TE’s and RB’s than we saw at any time last year. I am curious to see what the offense looks like on Friday and how it evolves...

I am not sure what game you were watching? 8 of the 18 completions were to TE’s or RB’s on Saturday night. That is a much higher percentage than at any time last year. Mo had 4 catches. IMO, we are a much better offense in 3 WR sets. We saw very little of that on Saturday. When we went 3 wide...

Ummmm....what? 2 scoring drives 29 yards or under. 1 fumble return 1 77 yard drive 1 70 yard drive

Huh? Clemson was a 6-7 team in 2010 having a future schedule with 2 power 5 opponents each year. Certainly Clemson "can afford to do this now" because of what Dabo has made them. Heck, it is to their benefit given the current state of the ACC. However, for years Clemson was a middling program...

Agreed. ASU would have been fun. Or UCLA.

You mean the same Clemson that plays South Carolina every year and had Texas A&M on the schedule this year? They have Notre Dame on the NC schedule 3 of the next 4 years as well. Then they follow that up with NC games against Georgia and LSU in btb years.

I believe he is referring to the kicker below, Dragan Kesich. https://247sports.com/player/dragan-kesich-46058679/

Greder just sent out a tweet that Kirk is headed to Penn State to be the OC.

So these from the Purdue game? I realize the NW game helmet is different with chrome gold.

Nope. They have not done CG/W/M this year.

Pat Forde takes the Gophers. A dink free zone thus far! Dash pick: Minnesota 21, Wisconsin 20. The Badgers' defense that was so good for the first half of the season has been springing some leaks lately: after giving up 4.8 points and 174 yards per game in the first six games, those numbers...