- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 5,146
- Reaction score
- 1,317
- Points
- 113
How would you grade this hire?
Incomplete. Lets see how he does before we grade him.
why is there always one person that says this?? no one is asking to grade his tenure or success at the U. simple poll, for what we know today, what grade?
i agree completely with CentralGopher's statement, "Incomplete. Lets see how he does before we grade him." For most of us who are not living, breathing, eating, voiding, sleeping in the circles of professional collegiate sports administration, it seems to me a more than reasonable response. Translated: How the heck are we supposed to know?
then don't vote or comment?
I believe this is analogous to telling a newlywed couple that there's a 50/50 chance they might divorce. Nobody wants to listen to reality during the honeymoon period.
AFAIK, what's not to like with Coyle? not a former coach or athlete i suppose, so he lacks that perspective but thats the modern way. Will he hire and fire the right people? Who knows? We'll save that for the post-mortem, hopefully decades from now.
i agree completely with CentralGopher's statement, "Incomplete. Lets see how he does before we grade him." For most of us who are not living, breathing, eating, voiding, sleeping in the circles of professional collegiate sports administration, it seems to me a more than reasonable response. Translated: How the heck are we supposed to know?
I'll let you know a few years from now.
Really I don't know how anyone could possibly know.....
How come 75% of posts end up in fights???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pretty solid. So far only Pete has voted 'D'.
then don't vote or comment?
Correct! The question is not "how has he performed as AD of the U?". It is a simple "was it a good hire?"
It was a Fricking home run! A young, well regarded, experienced P5 AD that has strong local ties and knows the U. He was a dream hire.
Now, the pundits can nitpick him to death over the next couple of decades..... The rest of us will support him.
Go with your gut and don't be such a stick in the mud. We're grading the choice of candidate, nothing more! It's a fricking poll for crying out loud! No one is an expert on this. Geez! Guess what, we can have another poll a year from now, it's true, we can.
By that argument nearly any hire would be an a+. Maybe I'm a little too touchy with all the political bs goin on lately. My apologies to any I offended here. Would a pass/fail grading system suit this?. In that case i'd give the hire a pass.
i agree completely with CentralGopher's statement, "Incomplete. Lets see how he does before we grade him." For most of us who are not living, breathing, eating, voiding, sleeping in the circles of professional collegiate sports administration, it seems to me a more than reasonable response. Translated: How the heck are we supposed to know?
Me to. But I am glad that Kaler was able to find an AD with experience. But the issues are many. Time will tell.
IMO, the first step would be to address the football ST donation issue and work to take steps to encourage long time ST holders to stay the course.