TonyLiebert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Messages
- 577
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Points
- 93
They’d do the top 2 play for the championship. It’s basically a way for them to guarantee the title game be against 2 top 10 teams.So, would this mean no conference championship game then? Or do we just take the 2 best and they would play it?
Playing any kind of championship outside of the Midwest for the Big Ten is a travesty IMO.
For sure. I think that’s a given.Well that means we get 1 more year of trying to win the division if we flop this year. Was thinking this might be our last shot.
B1G hoops in LA would be terrible but expected.
So 3 pods of 5 and one pod of 1?It's because of switching to 5 team pods.
So go to 10 conference games?For sure. I think that’s a given.
They are going to adopt a 5 locked 5 random schedule
Minnesota will play Iowa, wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska + 1 every year
Cycle through the other 10 home and home every 4 years.
This is the only way you can build a schedule that has only small chances for 3 way ties of teams that doesn’t play each other.
Also the only way USC plays penn state and Ohio state every year without having them in the same “division”
I predict:
Illinois - northwestern, Purdue, Indiana, Maryland, Ohio state
Indiana - purdue, Illinois, Rutgers, Maryland, Michigan state
Iowa - Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, northwestern, USC
Maryland - penn state, Rutgers, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan
Michigan - Ohio state, Michigan state, Minnesota, Maryland, Rutgers
Michigan state - Michigan, penn state, northwestern, Indiana, Minnesota
Minnesota - Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan state
Nebraska - Iowa, UCLA, USC, Minnesota, wisconsin
Northwestern - Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan state, Purdue
Ohio state - penn state, Michigan, USC, UCLA, Illinois
Penn state - Maryland, Rutgers, Ohio state,
Michigan state, USC
Purdue - Illinois, Indiana, UCLA, Rutgers, northwestern
Rutgers - penn state, Maryland, Indiana, Purdue, Michigan
UCLA - Nebraska, wisconsin, USC, Purdue, Ohio State
USC - Penn State, Nebraska, Iowa, Ohio State, UCLA
Wisconsin - Minnesota, Iowa, northwestern, Nebraska, UCLA
I think that is likelySo go to 10 conference games?
I wouldn’t mind 10 conference games but I’d like to see a league wide rule that only 1 of the non-conference games could be against an FCS foe.Not a fan of ten conference games. Enjoy seeing a variety of teams and like going on the road to new places.
Damn! You read my mind. I actually mapped out this exact same format on paper last night while I had nothing to do. Each team has 5 locked foes that constitute their final five conference games every year. This would ensure rivalry games are played late in the season. Then you can rotate a home and home with the other 10 teams in the conference and play all teams in the league every 4 years. I could live with that, but I’d also like to see a rule where teams could only schedule one FCS foe for one of the 2 non-conference games.For sure. I think that’s a given.
They are going to adopt a 5 locked 5 random schedule
Hopefully someone smarter than Kevin Warren will be making these decisions. He needs to go back to the ViQueens.
Lol. Hes been nothing short of brilliant so far.He really has been awful so far.
What gives you that idea? Also what do you have to back that up? Warren has been atrocious since the day he came, from the Covid handling, losing out on Texas / OU, and once did, sat on his hands until USC fell in his lap and he was forced to act. He has done B1G no favorsLol. Hes been nothing short of brilliant so far.
Don't let Corn Nation see that schedule, he would lose his mind. A locked in 0-5 every year.For sure. I think that’s a given.
They are going to adopt a 5 locked 5 random schedule
Minnesota will play Iowa, wisconsin, Michigan, Nebraska + 1 every year
Cycle through the other 10 home and home every 4 years.
This is the only way you can build a schedule that has only small chances for 3 way ties of teams that doesn’t play each other.
Also the only way USC plays penn state and Ohio state every year without having them in the same “division”
I predict:
Illinois - northwestern, Purdue, Indiana, Maryland, Ohio state
Indiana - purdue, Illinois, Rutgers, Maryland, Michigan state
Iowa - Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, northwestern, USC
Maryland - penn state, Rutgers, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan
Michigan - Ohio state, Michigan state, Minnesota, Maryland, Rutgers
Michigan state - Michigan, penn state, northwestern, Indiana, Minnesota
Minnesota - Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan state
Nebraska - Iowa, UCLA, USC, Minnesota, wisconsin
Northwestern - Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan state, Purdue
Ohio state - penn state, Michigan, USC, UCLA, Illinois
Penn state - Maryland, Rutgers, Ohio state,
Michigan state, USC
Purdue - Illinois, Indiana, UCLA, Rutgers, northwestern
Rutgers - penn state, Maryland, Indiana, Purdue, Michigan
UCLA - Nebraska, wisconsin, USC, Purdue, Ohio State
USC - Penn State, Nebraska, Iowa, Ohio State, UCLA
Wisconsin - Minnesota, Iowa, northwestern, Nebraska, UCLA
He has created one of the 2 super conferences in the country.What gives you that idea? Also what do you have to back that up? Warren has been atrocious since the day he came, from the Covid handling, losing out on Texas / OU, and once did, sat on his hands until USC fell in his lap and he was forced to act. He has done B1G no favors
UCLA usually isn’t THAT goodDon't let Corn Nation see that schedule, he would lose his mind. A locked in 0-5 every year.
Will there be an Iowa post-Ferentz? I always imagined the head coaching job would be passed down from generation to generation like the kings of yore, until one day Ferentz’s great great grandson is killed in an uprising of the corn farming serfs.UCLA usually isn’t THAT good
And Iowa post Ferentz may look different for better or for worse
We can discuss the Covid handling, but "losing out on Texas/OU?" LOL Texas we would have taken, they just wouldn't join without OU. And there is no chance B1G would have or should have taken OU. That was a good decision. And I don't think he was "forced" to act on USC. My guess is this has been in discussion for a long time and the timing just became right for USC and B1G. Making the B1G the most powerful entity in college sports is not a favor? And before you mention anything about the SEC, keep in mind they are currently a regional conference with limited options to change that. B1G is now a national conf, can grow more if it wants, and keep most college athletics decisions within their control. They can become the defacto NCAA. They have provided security for all the B1G schools. Warren has done many favors for the conference. Many more positives than negatives.What gives you that idea? Also what do you have to back that up? Warren has been atrocious since the day he came, from the Covid handling, losing out on Texas / OU, and once did, sat on his hands until USC fell in his lap and he was forced to act. He has done B1G no favors
In 1998 it was...will there be an Iowa post-Fry? Gophers got a close win in Iowa City in 1999. Haven't won at Kinnick since.Will there be an Iowa post-Ferentz? I always imagined the head coaching job would be passed down from generation to generation like the kings of yore, until one day Ferentz’s great great grandson is killed in an uprising of the corn farming serfs.