Does anyone remember the original topic of this thread? I find it a bit ironic that Winnipegopher makes an empathetic statement about what the two U of M employees have endured and suddenly this turns into a debate about his comments rather than addressing the topic of the thread. Winnipegopher feels some collective guilt and many of the rest of you don't. I get it, you aren't guilty and don't feel guilty. Teague was guilty. Fine. So back to the real topic, I don't know if Teague had malicious intent when he included information that could make it easier to identify his victims. Maybe, maybe not. In any case, when Ann Aronson and Erin Dady felt compelled to come forward because of the resulting speculation they used that opportunity to eloquently shine the light on sexual harassment. It was their right to remain anonymous but since that choice was taken from them, they made the best of it. If you haven't read the article and their full statement, you should.
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk