A_Slab_of_Bacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 24,484
- Reaction score
- 15,004
- Points
- 113
No limits at this time.Are we beyond unlimited transfers or are players still allowed unlimited transfers?
No limits at this time.Are we beyond unlimited transfers or are players still allowed unlimited transfers?
Quick google: As long as they are in academic good standing.No limits at this time.
One of the few NCAA rules that has stuck.Quick google: As long as they are in academic good standing.
Not trying to argue, but wouldn't the bolded be a reason in favor of bringing in transfers? Without a transfer, there's a risk you could replace the word "Kaliakmanis" with "Lindsay" in that sentence above and it could be true next year.Rentals are great but Minnesota should fundamentally continue to be a developmental program. The guys in the room need a chance to compete. Kaliakmanis was not good enough to play at MN and there was nobody behind him on the roster. I would rather see Minnesota try to develop Lindsay than blow their entire NIL budget on a QB.
That could be true with Jackson Kollack coming in too. If there was no 2025 high school qb then it might be easier to convince him to take the reins his 3rd year.Lindsay likely would be gone if a really good transfer QB was brought in next year and that would really really suck. Lindsay is a baller!
I'm sure @MplsGopher or one of the aliases has that beat, but point still taken!Possibly the most ridiculous post I've ever read on this board, congrats
But he could transfer down and then come back to p4 in a year or two....Not if it’s a transfer with only a year left. He didn’t have many P5 offers out of high school, can’t imagine he’d garner many if he transferred.
I laughed, that's actually funny.We're 1-9 against Iowa in the last 10 years. If you like playing them so much then maybe you're the weird one.
Ha would love to see that.Maybe this Jacob Clark guy at Missouri State. 5th most yards in FCS and 70% completions.
I’m not worried about him being physically ready.The entire reason for a developmental redshirt is to give him an entire year to get his body ready for next season. If he turns out to be average then we’ll want him to be a four-year starter that can provide consistency. If he turns out to be elite then he’ll be gone in two years anyway. If he can’t hack his way to bowl eligibility as a 19-year-old then he’s probably not going to be elite at 23. Playing him next year gives Fleck an entire season to gauge him early in his career, gives the team an excuse to rebuild, and cuts Fleck some slack because nobody is going to expect him to win the B1G with a Freshman QB.
If we want to get rental players then go get offensive lineman to protect him.
Someone will challenge it.One of the few NCAA rules that has stuck.
This comment has so much potential. I’m already thinking of ways I can modify for my own use.Twisting somehow even gets his personal opinions wrong.
I know you are just joking around but it isn't out of the realm of possibility to go find someone like Clark who started at power 4/5, dropped down to the FCS and then is ready for a second crack at the upper level again after a few years.Maybe this Jacob Clark guy at Missouri State. 5th most yards in FCS and 70% completions.
Was joking, but thought I saw JR, but you are correct. SR.I know you are just joking around but it isn't out of the realm of possibility to go find someone like Clark who started at power 4/5, dropped down to the FCS and then is ready for a second crack at the upper level again after a few years.
This is year 6 for Clark which I think means he is done but then again with the current rules he very well could have another year left...
I think Clark's bio did show that he had a year where he played a few games and then was injured.....medical redshirt maybe and a 7th year????....you might be onto something.Was joking, but thought I saw JR, but you are correct. SR.
Back to combing through FCS starting QB
I think he’d be a nice add if possible. Who knows maybe he loved it here but just wanted play time.I know you are just joking around but it isn't out of the realm of possibility to go find someone like Clark who started at power 4/5, dropped down to the FCS and then is ready for a second crack at the upper level again after a few years.
This is year 6 for Clark which I think means he is done but then again with the current rules he very well could have another year left...
I believe this is correct. They are moving up to the big time division and I think they are touting him as the guy to lead them into that. Zero chance he comes back here, but I like his game and overall style a lot.I think Clark's bio did show that he had a year where he played a few games and then was injured.....medical redshirt maybe and a 7th year????....you might be onto something.
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on what his highest priorities are. If he wants to play P4, it's unlikely he'd be able to transfer anywhere else P4 and be handed the job.Lindsay likely would be gone if a really good transfer QB was brought in next year and that would really really suck. Lindsay is a baller!
I don’t think we have to promise anything. If the qb is decent he should be confident he can beat out a redshirt freshman three star.The issue is going to be, what kind of talent can they bring in without promising the starting job? They got Brosmer because they told him he was the guy. But with Lindsay you have to at least have an open competition and most of the top transfer guys want guarantees on playing.
There's a huge difference between, "you have to beat out a redshift freshman that has been in the program for a year learning the playbook and throwing to the receivers" and "here's the keys please don't crash it".I don’t think we have to promise anything. If the qb is decent he should be confident he can beat out a redshirt freshman three star.
It’s a small difference to me. Still are asking a very experienced player to beat out an extremely inexperienced one. And again it’s not like Lindsey was highly sought after as a recruit. We are still going to be an attractive spot for a QB transfer. It’s not like there’s going to be 20 other P4 schools that will only have a true frosh to compete against like we did this year.There's a huge difference between, "you have to beat out a redshift freshman that has been in the program for a year learning the playbook and throwing to the receivers" and "here's the keys please don't crash it".
Minnesota got Brosmer because they could honestly say the latter. They will not be able to say that next year.
It’s a small difference to me. Still are asking a very experienced player to beat out an extremely inexperienced one. And again it’s not like Lindsey was highly sought after as a recruit. We are still going to be an attractive spot for a QB transfer. It’s not like there’s going to be 20 other P4 schools that will only have a true frosh to compete against like we did this year.
My gut feeling is power schools will be interested in Drake if he goes into the portal. Though the sample size is small and against inferior competition, he clearly has the talent at this level.Maybe, maybe not. Depends on what his highest priorities are. If he wants to play P4, it's unlikely he'd be able to transfer anywhere else P4 and be handed the job.