SelectionSunday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 24,731
- Reaction score
- 4,909
- Points
- 113
I'll update this occasionally on this thread. So far, so good for these guys, especially Ben & TJ.
Buzzing on a Wednesday afternoon.I'll update this occasionally on this thread. So far, so good for these guys, especially Ben & TJ.
Because Penn State is in the same conference and also, like the Gophers, is a bottom 5 program in the Big Ten. …. Gophers, Nebraska, Northwestern, Penn State, and Rutgers, the 5 programs that traditionally are battling to avoid Weakling Wednesday at the Big Ten Tournament. Being that it also has a first-year, first-time ever DI head coach, seems like a natural comparison?Not sure why you would include Shrewsberry at Penn State and not Smart (7-1) at Marquette a much more natural comparsion given proximity and program. Marquette/Woj was in the same number of NCAA tournaments with 1 fewer victory than Pitino during his 7 years. Penn State is one of the worst jobs in the conference and has been to 4 NCAA tournaments in the last 56 years.
Personally, I like Marquette as a comp, and they are the key team I keep an eye on as a reference. Regionally relevant, similar recent success in NCAA, coming off a long failed coaching hire over the same window of time. Both rosters were complete turnovers. Both fan bases expect teams to beat the little guys handily and aspire to consistently be in top 25. Biggest difference to me is that Marquette doesn’t have a Big Ten football team to help garner interest - they are a basketball only school.Because Penn State is in the same conference and also, like the Gophers, is a bottom 5 program in the Big Ten. …. Gophers, Nebraska, Northwestern, Penn State, and Rutgers, the 5 programs that traditionally are battling to avoid Weakling Wednesday at the Big Ten Tournament. Being that it also has a first-year, first-time ever DI head coach, seems like a natural comparison?
Also, Marquette is a private school.
I see some of your points but Shaka was/is a well-known, big-name, highly sought after hire with a long history of success as a head coach. At that point, we might as well just compare Johnson against literally anyone and everyone. It's like wondering what MN could have done had they gotten Coach K to come!Personally, I like Marquette as a comp, and they are the key team I keep an eye on as a reference. Regionally relevant, similar recent success in NCAA, coming off a long failed coaching hire over the same window of time. Both rosters were complete turnovers. Both fan bases expect teams to beat the little guys handily and aspire to consistently be in top 25. Biggest difference to me is that Marquette doesn’t have a Big Ten football team to help garner interest - they are a basketball only school.
Smart and BJ’s overall body of works obviously are not comparable at this point… but that’s what makes the comp interesting. What could MN have done if we hired a coach that can recruit using his past successes.
another interesting comp is how Marquette chose to fill their roster out. They have ten freshman to our 3 (counting Purcell). BJ will be almost in complete rebuild all over again next offseason, while Smart builds on a young roster.
I will be watching their trajectory for several years and be judging Coyle accordingly.
I blame Trixie from the Vu.I see some of your points but Shaka was/is a well-known, big-name, highly sought after hire with a long history of success as a head coach. At that point, we might as well just compare Johnson against literally anyone and everyone. It's like wondering what MN could have done had they gotten Coach K to come!
Shaka spurned the Gophers in the past so was certainly not going to come this time around. (Of note... we tried the Coach K-style hire in the past with Tubby Smith and that didn't lead to the sustained success that rallied the fan base either.) Hubert Davis is another first year head coach... at UNC... do we compare Johnson to him too?
In a few years, we will forget about this new coach title and can just compare the coaches on results regardless of tenure with the team. We all know that finding direct apples to apples comparisons are always difficult... there are just too many parameters that differ. There is no control subject in this experiment.
I’ve got friends who follow the Marquette program very closely, along with the gophers at arms length, who were shocked at the separation between the hired resumes. We’re we going to get Shaka, specifically? No for various reasons… but Marquette made a big splash where MN opted to pay lowest possible entry level for the big ten. The money itself doesn’t matter, but the strategy does. There wereI see some of your points but Shaka was/is a well-known, big-name, highly sought after hire with a long history of success as a head coach. At that point, we might as well just compare Johnson against literally anyone and everyone. It's like wondering what MN could have done had they gotten Coach K to come!
Shaka spurned the Gophers in the past so was certainly not going to come this time around. (Of note... we tried the Coach K-style hire in the past with Tubby Smith and that didn't lead to the sustained success that rallied the fan base either.) Hubert Davis is another first year head coach... at UNC... do we compare Johnson to him too?
In a few years, we will forget about this new coach title and can just compare the coaches on results regardless of tenure with the team. We all know that finding direct apples to apples comparisons are always difficult... there are just too many parameters that differ. There is no control subject in this experiment.
This doesn't get a lot air time around this hire but I think Coyle was not going to break the bank so shortly after nixing a number of non-revenue sports. Even if it was playing with other people's money... it just would not have been a good look.I’ve got friends who follow the Marquette program very closely, along with the gophers at arms length, who were shocked at the separation between the hired resumes. We’re we going to get Shaka, specifically? No for various reasons… but Marquette made a big splash where MN opted to pay lowest possible entry level for the big ten. The money itself doesn’t matter, but the strategy does. There were
other successful coaches we could have pursued. Marquette and Minnesota were teetering on the same ledge coming into this season. Marquette is not UNC. Or Texas. Minnesota is a Big Ten school, but we took a drastically different approach than Marquette. For that reason, I find the comparison interesting. No big deal if others don’t. I’m not suggesting SS alter his list.
Dont be.I'm jealous of Iowa State basketball right now.
I see a lot of similarities between us and ISU right now. The main difference is that Otz has head coaching experience and was able to get a higher level of talent in his first year. We should look at the Cyclones as a target for the Gophers’ near future.Dont be.
Over the next decade or so I am excited to read your comparisons and to watch you praise Coyle or hold his feet to the fire. Thank you for your service.Personally, I like Marquette as a comp, and they are the key team I keep an eye on as a reference. Regionally relevant, similar recent success in NCAA, coming off a long failed coaching hire over the same window of time. Both rosters were complete turnovers. Both fan bases expect teams to beat the little guys handily and aspire to consistently be in top 25. Biggest difference to me is that Marquette doesn’t have a Big Ten football team to help garner interest - they are a basketball only school.
Smart and BJ’s overall body of works obviously are not comparable at this point… but that’s what makes the comp interesting. What could MN have done if we hired a coach that can recruit using his past successes.
another interesting comp is how Marquette chose to fill their roster out. They have ten freshman to our 3 (counting Purcell). BJ will be almost in complete rebuild all over again next offseason, while Smart builds on a young roster.
I will be watching their trajectory for several years and be judging Coyle accordingly.
Just doing my gopherhole duty.Over the next decade or so I am excited to read your comparisons and to watch you praise Coyle or hold his feet to the fire. Thank you for your service.
I wish they were in the Big Ten.I see a lot of similarities between us and ISU right now. The main difference is that Otz has head coaching experience and was able to get a higher level of talent in his first year. We should look at the Cyclones as a target for the Gophers’ near future.
I have some ISU connections so they’re probably my second favorite team. It’s funny how many parallels our football teams have had with Fleck and Campbell, and now basketball is looking like that as well.
Did he have no head coaching experience, prior to being hired at NIU?Should Rashon Burno, who beat out Ben Johnson at Northern Illinois, be included as a comp?
Through January 11.
I thought Utes would be a little better than this. Treading some water at this point.wow rough start for craig smith. was this expected?