Sid Hartman
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 962
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
How is that not traveling on Kramer...he rolled over!
I think the reffing in the second half has almost as been as bad against Purdue as it was in the first against the Gophers.
I'm pretty sure JG is out of eligibility.
I think the reffing in the second half has almost as been as bad against Purdue as it was in the first against the Gophers.
I do not agree with this assessment. While they have started making some phantom calls against the Purdue, they've continued to do so against the Gophers. That said, the Boilers have played much better in the second half and clearly would have won the game going away despite any reffing imbalances.
If you're implying that the refereeing caused a 14-19 point swing, I absolutely disagree.If "won the game going away" means by between 0-5 points, then I agree.
means very little when they try to even it out once the game is out of hand.
Bottom line is Purdue in the second half showed they are much better, especially at home, and deserved the win but the complaints on BT refs still stand and it would of been nice to see this game play out had they not taken over in the first half and I imagine if we visit the Purdue board this weekend when they visit Bo and Madison, that we will be reading many of the same complaints from there fans.
Yep, this is all the refs fault. Minnesota should take little responsibility for losing the lead! Unreal! It's so easy to just blame it on the refs. Have you thought, maybe, just maybe, Purdue has better players than the Gophers?
I don't usually get upset anymore about biased referees but this was one of the worst officiated games I've ever seen. From the six minute mark of the first half to to the three minute mark of the second half (when the game was no longer a game) the officiating was grossly one way. I would guess there was a combination of twenty times when the gophers got hammered and there were no calls or Purdue got touched and the whistle blew. What is more important than a gopher loss was the lack of integrity of the game. Shameful. Way beyond home cooking.
Purdue is a pretty good team but they will be out after the first or second round of the tourney. I thought the gophers played pretty well. Unfortunately, what I will remember about this game is the officiating.
Agreed with most of it except the bold. They were in the Sweet Sixteen last year and played well against UConn. They've been good for three years. I see no reason why they won't challenge for the Final Four this year.
They seem fundamentally solid but I don't think that they don't have the guard play or the athletic ability to go far in the tournament.
In case I'm wrong are you going to jump all over me for the next three years? BTW, when was the last time we saw AP turn the corner?
Purdue is a pretty good team but they will be out after the first or second round of the tourney.