joshvanklomp
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 1,923
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
It's called answering a question that was asked of me; that was my only point.Aside from having a more difficult schedule in 1903-1906, what's your point?
It's called answering a question that was asked of me; that was my only point.Aside from having a more difficult schedule in 1903-1906, what's your point?
So you agree it's silly to use Texas (or LSU) as a self-serving measuring stick for what Minnesota should or shouldn't do?
I was hoping we would keep Claeys. However, I feel if you are going to retain him you almost have to extend his contact or it will hurt recruiting.
No we weren't. This is the type of mindset that has left the Gophers in the middle to lower tier of the B1G for decades. Losing all four impact games isn't close to winning them. Our winning percentage against T25 teams and rivals tells you exactly what this program has been, and it's disingenuous to claim we're close now to winning those games. If we want that to change, we have to speak honestly about the fact that we've been losers, and it's time for the program to create change through hard decisions.
I agree that an 8-4 record is good out of context. That said, many Gopher fans are just exasperated at this program losing at every major opportunity, and losing to your main rival for 14 years in a row. Combining that with an extension for a buffoonish coach really ruffles some fans' jimmies.
Coyle said that he and Claeys are working on an extension.
Can you hear it? The sound of hearts breaking all over GopherHole. Guess you'll all have to put up with the fat, poorly dressed, inarticulate, accent-having, soft-spoken, 8-game-winning coach for another season.
See a common theme? 3 of our losses were directly related to a Mitch INT in the 2nd half. We were close in all 4. It's not worth a moral victory, but we weren't getting shelled.
Gopher football: Can't beat ranked teams or rivals, but hey we didn't get blown out. Contract extension.
Imagine Nick Saban leaves Alabama after the season. Bama makes the decision to promote Kiffin or their DC to head coach. In the new coach's 1st year, Alabama goes 8-4. What would happen? The new guy would get a 2nd year.
Imagine Nick Saban leaves Alabama after the season. Bama makes the decision to promote Kiffin or their DC to head coach. In the new coach's 1st year, Alabama goes 8-4. What would happen? The new guy would get a 2nd year.
I have a hard time understanding how some of you actually believe there was a chance he wasn't coming back.
I don't think many thought he would be gone. I didn't think he would be goneI have a hard time understanding how some of you actually believe there was a chance he wasn't coming back.
Imagine Nick Saban leaves Alabama after the season. Bama makes the decision to promote Kiffin or their DC to head coach. In the new coach's 1st year, Alabama goes 8-4. What would happen? The new guy would get a 2nd year.
I have a hard time understanding how some of you actually believe there was a chance he wasn't coming back.
I would imagine if Claeys had multiple conference and national titles on his coordinator resume, people might be more patient.
My grandmother could have multiple national championships on her coordinator resume if she worked for Saban.
If it was guaranteed that Claeys was coming back, why would MC have waited so long to announce it? Pure speculation on my part, but I think he made some calls.
If it was guaranteed that Claeys was coming back, why would MC have waited so long to announce it? Pure speculation on my part, but I think he made some calls.
My grandmother could have multiple national championships on her coordinator resume if she worked for Saban.
I've lurked all day, but figure it's time to chime in: Tracy Claeys and this staff absolutely deserve extensions, and anyone who thinks otherwise is out of their minds in my opinion.
With some continuity, continued development of young players and slightly improved quarterback play this team could compete for the division title both next year and in 2018. Why on earth would you blow that all up now for an unknown quantity is beyond me.
Am I concerned about recruiting and do I think there is something to the "not the face of the program" argument? Sure maybe a little bit. But that is not a good enough reason to blow everything up and start over, especially given the number of returning starters we have.
Extending Claeys by 2 years and giving him a slight raise while maintaining a low buyout, which is what I expect will happen, is 100% the right move. And it's not even close.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk