SHUTOUT

Was it a catch?

  • No

    Votes: 3 18.8%
  • Definitely not

    Votes: 6 37.5%
  • Incomplete Pass

    Votes: 7 43.8%

  • Total voters
    16

Goldmember

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
2,962
Reaction score
1,326
Points
113
We need a thread dedicated to just how awful that incomplete pass call reversal was.

Just watched the video several times. It wasn’t a catch. The video very clearly shows both toes had already left the turf by the time the ball arrived.
 

Not going to waste any more time on this. It's a done deal. Kind of like Iowans still gripping about the fair catch signal that they thought was invalid.
 





The problem I have with it, is what ever happened to clear and obvious. The ref that was like 12 feet away had a much better view than the replay was in the snow. Glad it didn’t matter. Just an irritant in the long run.
That’s the thing for me — and it’s not even about this particular play. “Clear and obvious” (or whatever they say now) should just be taken out of the rule. Replay has become about microseconds, angles not even available to the broadcast, and scrutinizing frame by frame. I’m all for getting calls right, but it’s gotten crazy. They should either a) take out that language, b) actually start officiating that way, or c) put a time limit on reviews to encourage going with the call on the field unless wildly obvious.
 



At the game I thought he stepped out FIRST then was the first to touch the ball, illegal touching.

I had a very clear view from most of the way up, midfield, lower level ...
 




That’s the thing for me — and it’s not even about this particular play. “Clear and obvious” (or whatever they say now) should just be taken out of the rule. Replay has become about microseconds, angles not even available to the broadcast, and scrutinizing frame by frame. I’m all for getting calls right, but it’s gotten crazy. They should either a) take out that language, b) actually start officiating that way, or c) put a time limit on reviews to encourage going with the call on the field unless wildly obvious.
There was far greater evidence to overturn the Oregon touchdown pass than this incompletion call. The inconsistency is the major issue no matter the standard applied.
 





At the game I thought he stepped out FIRST then was the first to touch the ball, illegal touching.

I had a very clear view from most of the way up, midfield, lower level ...
I thought the same, that his left foot was initially out and he then stepped back in bounds.
 



Doesn't this picture show his left shoot clearly inbounds, though? The Maroon is IN bounds. His foot in on the Maroon in this picture.
I don’t think it’s that clear. Part of the shoe is red so it’s pretty hard to tell 100%. Also I’d love to see a replay of the long pass to set up the TD, pretty sure the play clock expired prior to the snap.
 




Top Bottom